ISSN : 1301-5680
e-ISSN : 2149-8156
TURKISH JOURNAL OF
THORACIC AND
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery     
A subxiphoid single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A case report
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
DOI : 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2017.13849

Abstract

The term subxiphoid is generally referred to an incision that situated or performed below the xiphoid process. Mostly, it is used for pericardial window opening and thymectomy combined with cervical incision. Herein, we report the first case in Turkey of subxiphoid single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for a middle lobe tumor.

Introduction

Minimally invasive surgery has been utilized in thoracic surgery. With the recent developments in this technique, the incisions have become smaller with a reduced number of ports and, thus, uniportal videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has evolved dramatically over the past decade.[1] To push the boundaries of minimally invasive thoracic surgery one step further, subxiphoid incision interventions have been defined.[2] Herein, we, for the first time, report a case of subxiphoid single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in a patient with a middle lobe tumor in Turkey.

Case Presentation

A 49-year-old male patient was admitted to our clinic with a 3 cm mass in the middle lobe as assessed by thoracic computed tomography (CT) (Figure 1). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showed no locoregional or distant metastasis. Transthoracic biopsy result was reported as non-small cell lung cancer. The patient was scheduled for surgery.

Figure 1: A computed tomography scan showing the mass in the middle lobe.

A written informed consent was obtained from the patient. Under general anesthesia with doublelumen endotracheal tube intubation, the patient was positioned in a supine position with both arms 90° abducted from the neutral position. A 4 cm midline longitudinal incision was made immediately below the sternocostal triangle. The rectus abdominis was divided at the midline to expose the xiphoid process. The rectus abdominis insertion to the xiphoid process was detached by an electric knife. Subsequently, we reached the infrasternal angle, which is formed by the xiphoid process and the subcostal margin. A 10 mm and 30° rigid endoscope was used. After separating the adhesions in the chest wall and pericardium, oblique and horizontal fissures were dissected. The middle lobe vein, bronchus, and artery were divided, respectively with endostaplers (uniportal VATS). Finally, the parenchyma was divided with an endostapler and the specimen was removed inside an endobag. Additionally, No 2, 4, 7, and 10 nodal sampling was performed.

Following surgery, a 24-Fr chest tube was placed via the same subxiphoid incision (Figure 2). The patient tolerated the whole procedure well without any pain. The chest tube was removed on postoperative Day 3, and the patient was discharged uneventfully. The pathology result was reported as an adenocarcinoma.

Figure 2: The appearance of the subxiphoid incision right after surgery.

Discussion

In recent years, there has been a trend toward minimally invasive approach in thoracic surgery. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has become popular, particularly in the past two decades. It is clear that there is a learning curve and VATS lobectomy ratio can be increased with experience.[3] Uniportal (single-incision) VATS has been described to raise the bar to a new level.[1]

It has been reported that single-incision VATS, which has been proposed as an alternative approach for thoracic diseases since 2000, can reduce postoperative pain without compromising the main surgical steps required for treating patients.[4] During the single-incision VATS, as reported by Rocco unlike conventional, three-port VATS, the uniportal VATS enables the surgeon to bring the operative fulcrum inside the chest, when the target lung lesion is approached through a sagittal plan, owing to its articulating instruments.[5]

Uniportal thoracoscopic interventions were also reported in a large series which was described both for diagnostic and therapeutic indications.[4] This technique is described as a reliable procedure to be used in the diagnostic pathways of several intrathoracic conditions and to resect small pulmonary nodules with either diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.[4] As such, uniportal VATS contributes to to the surgical armamentarium.[4] In the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, uniportal VATS appeared to be tolerable, safe, and effective. Also, postoperative pain and paraesthesia incidence were lower than threeport VATS.[6]

As an alternative approach, the subxiphoid singleincision VATS was defined to be safe and reliable for bilateral lung diseases and was reported to significantly relieve postoperative incision pain.[7] Similarly, o ur case experienced no pain after surgery at all.

The subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy was also reported in large series as feasible and safe for early-stage lung cancer and benign diseases.[ One of the advantages of this technique through a subxiphoid incision is that it can be used for bilateral lung diseases. In the literature, single-incision VATS via a subxiphoid route for bilateral primary spontaneous pneumothorax was reported without any major surgical problems.[8]

The potential benefit of the subxiphoid singleincision VATS technique is the decrease in the postoperative pain and avoidance of chest wall paresthesia which can be expected, since there is only one incision and the surgical site is away from the intercostal space. The injury to the intercostal nerve, thus, would be minimized using this technique.

On the other hand, the disadvantages of subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy include the utilization of left-sided approaches, need for major bleeding control and complete lymphadenectomy.[2] The instrumentation over a beating heart can be problematic, particularly in left-sided procedures, and can cause arrhythmia. In case of major bleeding, an additional thoracotomy must be performed, as the extension of the subxiphoid incision is unlikely to be useful. Also, the dissection of the subcarinal lymph node can be challenging and, in that case, it is possible to perform nodal sampling alone.[2] We believe that right upper lobectomy can be performed easily using long instruments. However, lower lobectomies can be challenging, as the lower pulmonary vein dissection may prove to be difficult.

The use of subxiphoid incision by the surgeons in the Far East is not uncommon. However, there is a limited number of reports in the literature about this approach in the Western world. We believe that intercostal nerve injury can be avoided with this approach, since, with uniportal VATS, it is possible to damage the nerves with two or more instruments located in the intercostal space due to the compression on these structures. The use of this incision, in particular to our case, seemed appropriate preoperatively, as middle lobectomy is very easy to perform using this approach and the procedure is almost pain-free.

In conclusion, subxiphoid incision can be used as an alternative to uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures, particularly in the right hemithorax, as in the present case.

Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

References

1) Ng CS, Rocco G, Wong RH, Lau RW, Yu SC, Yim AP. Uniportal and single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery: the state of the art. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014;19:661-6.

2) Hernandez-Arenas LA, Lin L, Yang Y, Liu M, Guido W, Gonzalez-Rivas D, et al. Initial experience in uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for major lung resections. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;50:1060-6.

3) Cosgun T, Baysungur V, Tezel C, Okur E, Alpay L, Kutlu CA, et al. Learning and improvement process of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: experiences of Süreyyapaşa. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2014;22:589-95.

4) Rocco G, Martucci N, La Manna C, Jones DR, De Luca G, La Rocca A, et al. Ten-year experience on 644 patients undergoing single-port (uniportal) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:434-8.

5) Rocco G. One-port (uniportal) video-assisted thoracic surgical resections--a clear advance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144:27-31.

6) Ocakcioglu I, Alpay L, Demir M, Kiral H, Akyil M, Dogruyol T, et al. Is single port enough in minimally surgery for pneumothorax? Surg Endosc 2016;30:59-64.

7) Song N, Zhao DP, Jiang L, Bao Y, Jiang GN, Zhu YM, et al. Subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy: a report of 105 cases. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:251-7.

8) Liu CY, Lin CS, Liu CC. Subxiphoid single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2015;10:125-8.

Keywords : Minimally invasive surgery; pulmonary resection; subxiphoid incision

Viewed : 989
Downloaded : 436