ISSN : 1301-5680
e-ISSN : 2149-8156
TURKISH JOURNAL OF
THORACIC AND
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery     
Nodal involvement adversely affects prognosis in pulmonary carcinoid tumors
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
DOI : 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15566

Abstract

Background: This study aims to analyze the prognostic factors affecting survival in pulmonary carcinoid tumors.

Methods: Gender, age, smoking habit, comorbidity, localization of the tumor, T status, N status, histological type, and pathological stage of patients who had undergone resection of pulmonary carcinoid tumor between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2016 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: A total of 47 patients (18 male, 29 female; mean age 50.5 years; range, 23 to 74 years) consisting of 40 typical and 7 atypical carcinoid tumor cases were included in our study. Anatomical resection and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection was performed on all patients. Pathological studies revealed lymphatic involvement in six patients (12.8%; 4 pN1 and 2 pN2). In the typical group (n=40), three patients were classified N1 (7.5%) and one patient N2 (2.5%). In the atypical group (n=7), one patient were classified N1 (14.3%) and one patient N2 (14.3%). Throughout the study, four patients with typical histology (10%) and two patients with atypical histology (28.6%) had nodal involvement. All six patients with nodal involvement underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Atypical histology (p=0.005) and nodal involvement (p=0.008) were determined as negative prognostic factors in statistical analysis.

Conclusion: Systematic hilar and mediastinal nodal dissection play a crucial role in the surgical treatment of pulmonary carcinoid tumors.

Introduction

Primary bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors constitute approximately 1 to 2% of all pulmonary tumors.[1] All bronchopulmonary carcinoids are classified as malignant, despite their slow growth, they can invade and metastasize. They can be histopathologically classified as typical or atypical. Although surgical resection is the standard treatment for pulmonary carcinoid tumors, controversy exists regarding factors that affect survival. Many experiences of surgical management of pulmonary carcinoids have been reported, but there is no clear agreement on its main prognostic factors such as gender, age, smoking status, comorbidity, central versus peripheral localization, T status, histological type, N status, and pathological state.

Methods

The study protocol was approved by the Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee. A written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients who underwent anatomic lung resection for typical or atypical carcinoid tumor between January 2005 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the 2004 World Health organization (WHO) classification, typical carcinoid tumors are defined as <2 mitoses per 10 high power fields, lacking necrosis, and larger than 5 mm.[2] A total of 47 patients diagnosed with pulmonary carcinoid tumor consisted of 21 (44.7%) male and 26 (55.3%) female patients with ages ranging from 23-74 years. Evaluation of the patients included physical examination with pulmonary function tests, standard chest radiograph, total body computed tomography scans, and bronchoscopy. Thirteen patients (27.7%) were asymptomatic at presentation. The most common presentation was evidence of bronchial obstruction (n=19; 40.4%), and 15 patients (32.9%) presented with hemoptysis. None of our patients had evidence of carcinoid syndrome. In total, 17 patients (36.2%) had additional comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, etc.). None of the patients in the study, had evidence of additional malignancy. Tumors visualized at bronchoscopy were classified as central (n=37; 79%) or peripheral (n=10; 21.3%). Tumors were located in the right lung (59.6%) in 28 patients (central 21; 75.0% and peripheral 7; 25.0%), and in the left lung (40.4%) in 19 patients (central 16; 84.2% and peripheral 3; 15.8%). Diagnosis was made by means of bronchoscopy in 21 patients (44.7%) and by transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy in eight (17%). Diagnosis was made with thoracotomy in 18 patients (38.3%). No evidence of hilar and mediastinal lymphadenomegaly was identified in any patient preoperatively. Because no enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes were found in radiological evaluation, preoperative cervical mediastinoscopy was not performed in any of the patients. All patients except eleven who were resected with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, underwent resection with serratus anterior sparing thoracotomy. Anatomic resection consisted of lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy, or sleeve resection. At the start of the study, all patients underwent systematic hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection with hypothetical preference and clinical decision. Bronchial margins frozen section was performed after bronchoplastic procedures in all cases. The seventh edition of the International Classification of TNM was used for staging. Operative mortality included patients who died within the first 30 days of the operation. Distributions of gender, age, smoking status, comorbidity, central versus peripheral localization, T status, histological type, N status, and pathological state were tested with the log-rank test. Cumulative survival probabilities were estimated with the Kaplan and Meier method.

Results

According to histological findings, 40 patients (17 males, 23 females; mean age 50.5 years; range, 23 to 74 years) had typical carcinoid tumors, and seven patients (4 males, 3 females; mean age ?? years; range, 32 to 70 years) had atypical carcinoid tumors. Variations in terms of tumor histology are shown in Table 1. Thirteen (33%) of the 40 patients with typical tumors and four (57%) of the seven patients with atypical tumors were smokers (overall n=17; 36.2%).

Table 1: Variables regarding tumor histology

Operations included lobectomy in 38 (80.9%; sleeve lobectomy in 7), bilobectomy in seven (14.9%; sleeve bilobectomy in 1), and pneumonectomy in two patients (4.3%; sleeve tracheal pneumonectomy in 1) (Table 2). Non-anatomic resection was not performed in any of the patients. Eleven patients (23.4%) underwent resection using a minimally invasive video-assisted recent approach. All patients underwent complete tumor resection. Systematic lymph node dissection was performed as a standard approach in all patients. The mean number of resected lymph nodes was 13 (range, 6-18) per patient.

Table 2: Type of resection

The majority of the patients (n=39) were in stage I (IA: 25, IB:14). Six were in stage II (IIA: 1, IIB:5), and two were in stage IIIA. Lymph node metastasis was detected in six cases (4 N1, 2 N2). Since radiotherapy may provide potential benefit, particularly in patients with lymph node-positive disease, the six patients with nodal involvement received adjuvant radiotherapy.

Postoperative mortality did not occur. Surgical complications included prolonged air leak (n=1), postoperative hemorrhage (n=1), and the morbidity rate was 4.3%. Pathological studies demonstrated lymphatic spread in six patients (12.8%; four pN1 and two pN2). In the typical group (n=40), three patients were classified N1 ( 7.5%) a nd o ne N 2 ( 2.5%). I n t he atypical group (n=7), one patient were classified N1 (14.3%) and one N2 (14.3%). Overall, four patients with typical histology (10%) and two patients with atypical histology (28.6%) had nodal involvement. A total of 41 patients were free of nodal involvement (87.2%). All patients (n=47) were followed up for a total of 2,444 months with a median observation time of 52 months (mean, 38 months; range, 11 to 146 months). Follow-up ended on October 2017. Five patients died (three from cancer and two from unrelated causes). All three of the patients who died from cancer were atypical carcinoid. The overall five-year survival rate was 88.2% and the mean survival time was 124.4 months (95% confidence interval, 107.4 to 141.3). Five-year survival was 94.4% in typical tumors (n=40), and 55.6% in atypical tumors (n=7; p=0.005) (Figure 1). According to N0 status (n=41), five-year survival was 90.5%, and N+ status (n=6), 80.0% (p=0.008) (Figure 2). Atypical histology and nodal invasion were found to be significant prognostic factors (Table 3). Tumor location (central versus peripheric), and stage did not seem to statistically affect survival (Figure 3 and 4). Five-year survival was 73.5% in male (n=21) and 91.6% in female patients (n=26; p=0.433). In patients under and over 50 years of age, five-year survival was 100% and 81.2%, respectively (p=0.474). In terms of smoking history, overall five-year survival was 93.3% in smokers and 86.7% in non-smokers (p=0.726).

Figure 1: Prognostic influence of tumor histology. Univariable analysis (Kaplan-Meier) (p=0.005).

Figure 2: Prognostic influence of nodal invasion. Univariable analysis (Kaplan-Meier) (p=0.008).

Table 3: Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival

Figure 3: Prognostic influence of tumor location. Univariable analysis (Kaplan-Meier) (p=0.717).

Figure 4: Cumulative survival of stage I (IA+IB) versus stage II (IIA+IIB) + IIIA. Univariable analysis (Kaplan-Meier) (p=0.170).

Discussion

Because carcinoid tumors are known to be benign for many years, most authors did not perform a systematic lymphadenectomy and the prognostic role of lymph nodal involvement could not be clarified.[3] Universally accepted guidelines and randomized clinical trials still do not exist. Many reports agree that atypical histology is an important prognostic factor related to survival. However, other prognostic factors are not well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting survival. We evaluated gender (p=0.433), age (under and over 50 years; p=0.474), smoking habits (p=0.726), comorbidity (p=0.062), tumor location (central versus peripheral; p=0.717), and T status (T1 versus T2+T3; p=0.300), and we did not find any statistical correlation to survival. Only atypical histology (p=0.005) and nodal invasion (p=0.008) were significantly correlated with survival. Filosso et al.[3] demonstrated that both atypical histology and lymphatic involvement were independent negative prognostic factors. Aydin et al.[4] also emphasized the histological type and lymph-node involvement to be the most important prognostic factors effecting longterm survival. Nevertheless, Karapınar et al.[5] reported that, contrary to what was expected, N status did not have an effect on survival in their study.

Some studies emphasize a relationship between tobacco use and atypical carcinoids, but whether or not carcinoid tumors are associated with smoking is still a matter of debate.[6] Thirty three percent of patients in our study with typical and 57% with atypical tumors were smokers, and we did not observe a statistically significant difference in terms of survival (p=0.726).

At present, some authors believe that intraoperative lymph node dissection may not be essential, especially in the surgical treatment of typical carcinoid tumors.[7] Wurtz et al.[8] reported that systematic nodal dissection showed a high frequency of unpredictable lymphatic spread, mainly in the typical carcinoid group. A growing number of reports are emphasizing the potentially curative effect of systematic nodal dissection even in typical carcinoid tumors.[8-10] We also believe that surgical resection of carcinoid tumors and complete systematic lymph node dissection is necessary to determine possible lymph node metastasis. In our study, all patients underwent systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection. At least three lymph nodes from the 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th zones in the right hemithorax and the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th zones in the left hemithorax were dissected. Therefore, nodal status is an important prognostic factor in predicting survival and systematic nodal dissection is mandatory to treat carcinoids with curative intent.

Concerning the type of resection, some authors believe wedge resection to be safe for small peripheral typical carcinoid tumors.[7] Fox et al.[11] stated that, compared to lobectomy, sublobar resection is not inferior in regarding survival in typical carcinoid patients. But there are reports that sublobar resections may be related with locoregional recurrence, and high probability of missing eventual N1 lymph nodes.[3,9] Aydin et al.[4] reported that overall survival was lowest in the wedge group. Therefore, we also recommend completion lobectomy when frozen section is tumor free but paraffin positive, in case of wedge resection cases. Carcinoid tumors are malignant neoplasms and should be treated with anatomical resection. Nonanatomic resection was not performed in our study. The latest publications also noted that parenchyma-sparing resections are suitable for proximal carcinoid tumors.[12]

In conclusion, we demonstrated that atypical presentation (p=0.005), and nodal invasion (p=0.008) were both negative prognostic factors. Prognosis does not seem to be related to sex (p=0.433), age (p=0.474), smoking history (p=0.726), comorbidity (p=0.062), central or peripheral localization (p=0.717), or T status (p=0.300). For optimal oncological results, an anatomic lung resection associated with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy is crucial.

Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

References

1) Naalsund A, Rostad H, Strøm EH, Lund MB, Strand TE. Carcinoid lung tumors--incidence, treatment and outcomes: a population-based study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:565-9.

2) Travis WD, Brambilla E, Muller-Hermlink HK, Harris CC. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004.

3) Filosso PL, Oliaro A, Ruffini E, Bora G, Lyberis P, Asioli S, et al. Outcome and prognostic factors in bronchial carcinoids: a single-center experience. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:1282-8.

4) Aydin E, Yazici U, Gulgosteren M, Agackiran Y, Kaya S, Gulhan E, et al. Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with surgically treated pulmonary carcinoid: our institutional experience with 104 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:549-54.

5) Karapınar K, Saydam Ö, Büyükkale S, Metin M, Günlüoğlu Z, Demir A, et al. Long-term results of surgical treatment of pulmonary carcinoids. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2015;23:304-8.

6) Filosso PL, Rena O, Donati G, Casadio C, Ruffini E, Papalia E, et al. Bronchial carcinoid tumors: surgical management and long-term outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:303-9.

7) Ferguson MK, Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR, Altorki NK, Naunheim KS, Zwischenberger JB, et al. Long-term outcome after resection for bronchial carcinoid tumors. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:156-61.

8) Wurtz A, Benhamed L, Conti M, Bouchindhomme B, Porte H. Results of systematic nodal dissection in typical and atypical carcinoid tumors of the lung. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:388-94.

9) Cañizares MA, Matilla JM, Cueto A, Algar J, Muguruza I, Moreno-Mata N, et al. Atypical carcinoid tumours of the lung: prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence. Thorax 2014;69:648-53.

10) García-Yuste M, Matilla JM, Cueto A, Paniagua JM, Ramos G, Cañizares MA, et al. Typical and atypical carcinoid tumours: analysis of the experience of the Spanish Multicentric Study of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Lung. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:192-7.

11) Fox M, Van Berkel V, Bousamra M 2nd, Sloan S, Martin RC 2nd. Surgical management of pulmonary carcinoid tumors: sublobar resection versus lobectomy. Am J Surg 2013;205:200-8.

12) Dadaş E, Tanju S, Özkan B, Bayrak Y, Kaba E, Dilege Ş, et al. Surgical management of bronchial carcinoid tumors: 11-year experience. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2014;22:795-9.

Keywords : Nodal involvement; prognostic factors; pulmonary carcinoid tumor

Viewed : 454
Downloaded : 136