Comparison of hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery

Gökhan İnangil

doi:10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15716

Gökhan İnangil¹, Kadir Hakan Cansız¹, Fuat Gürbüz¹, Ömer Bakal¹, Fatma Merih Gökben¹, Hüseyin Şen

¹Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Sultan Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey

DOI : 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15716

Background: This study aimed to compare hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation using GlideScope and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery.

Methods: A total of 74 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups either a GlideScope (n=37) or a Macintosh laryngoscope (n=37). Laryngoscopy time, heart rate, invasive arterial pressure and rate pressure product were compared during induction and until five minutes after laryngoscopy at 11 time points.

Results: Seventy patients completed the study. The intubation time was similar in both groups (14.1±4.0 sec vs. 13.2±4.2 sec; p=0.22). Hemodynamic values including heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure and rate pressure product were similar at all-time points. The laryngoscopy time was also similar between groups.

Conclusion: The GlideScope video laryngoscope did not show any advantage on hemodynamic response in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery when compared to Macintosh laryngoscope.

Keywords : Cardiovascular surgery; GlideScope; hemodynamic response; intubation; laryngoscopy

Viewed : 6844

Downloaded : 1264