Methods: Fourty-six Sprague-Dawley male rats with a weight range of 310-370 g were included in the study. Rats were divided into six groups: (i) ischemic alone (I group; n=8); (ii) passive exsanguination group of whose major abdominal veins were cut following death (PE group; n=8) (iii) group of whose major abdominal veins were cut and sacrified with rapid exsanguination (RE group; n=8); (iv) lung perfusion group with saline (SP group; n=8); (v) lung perfusion group with Perfadex (PP group; n=8) and (vi) control group (C group; n=6). Rats in all experiement groups except rapid exsanguination ones and all in the control group were euthanized with intrahepatic pentobarbital. Lungs were removed following euthanasia in the controls. In all study groups, lungs were ventilated in the cadavers at room temperature for 120 minutes and kept in warm ischemia.
Results: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, luminol chemiluminescence (CL) values and non-viable cell rate were higher in the ischemia group. The PE group had increased MPO activity, lucigenin CL values and nonviable cell rate, whereas the RE group had reduced MPO activity and luminol CL values, compared to ischemia group. MPO activity, lucigenin CL levels and non-viable cell rate were lower in the RE group, compared to PE. The PP had lower MPO activity and luminol CL values, compared to SP or ischemia group, whereas non-viable cell rate increased.
Conclusion: Death following rapid exsanguination results in better preservation of lung viability and minimal oxidative injury. This may be explained by rapid loss of platelets and inflammatory cells in the tissue and shift of extravascular fluid to intravascular compartment.
Most of the studies on NHBDs are focused on ischemia-reperfusion injury, primarily regarding events occurring after reperfusion: however, several inflammatory and cellular changes occur during warm ischemia, depending on the length of the ischemic period.[7]
Inflammatory cells contribute to reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation in the lung tissue which cause oxidative stress and injury.[10] Reactive oxygen species are mainly produced by phagocytes as well as polymorphonuclear, alveolar, bronchial, and endothelial cells. Activated phagocytes synthesize and release both superoxide (O2·–) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl). The myeloperoxidase (MPO) enzyme oxidizes Cl- found within the cytoplasm or in the extracellular fluid, into HOCl. A reaction between the HOCl and O2·– further increases hydroxyl radical (·OH) concentration thus causing tissue damage.[11]
Chemiluminescence (CL) is an accepted and accurate method of estimating ROS generation.[12,13] This technique, which measures light production as a byproduct of oxidative metabolism, has been utilized to demonstrate the involvement of ROS in various conditions. Luminol and lucigenin are widely used CL probes with different selectivity. Luminol quantifies a group of reactive species, including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ·OH, and hypochlorite (OCl-), whereas lucigenin is mostly selective for superoxide measurements.[14]
As most of the inflammatory agents causing ischemic injury are components of blood, we hypothesized in this study that washing out the blood from the lungs with various techniques may reduce oxidative injury during the warm ischemic period. We investigated the role of exsanguination on the viability of lung tissue with biochemical and histochemical analysis.
Experimental protocol
The rats were divided into six groups, one being the
control group and five being experimental groups
consisting of six to eight rats each.
The animals were anesthetized by intraperitoneal administration of 35 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium (IE Ulagay, İstanbul, Turkey). Briefly, a small laparotomy incision was performed, and 600 U heparin (Mustafa Nevzat, İstanbul, Turkey) was injected intrahepatically. An incision was made to expose the trachea, and the animal was intubated with a tracheotomy. Other than the rapid exsanguination (RE) group, the rats in the other experimental groups were euthanized with an intrahepatic pentobarbital sodium (120 mg/kg) injection. On the other hand, the rats in RE group (n=8) were sacrified by rapid exsanguination via division of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava in the abdomen. Cardiac arrest was documented by observation of absence of cardiac motion transmitted through the diaphragm and by palpation in all experimental groups. At this point, the heart-lung blocks were harvested via median sternotomy in the control (C) group (n=6). In the study groups, immediately after death, the lungs were ventilated through a cannula (8F) by a rodent ventilator (Harvard rodent ventilator Model 683; Harvard Apparatus Co. Millis, MA) at a tidal volume of 3 cc at a rate of 60 breaths/min and a positive endexpiratory pressure of 2 cm H2O for 120 minutes at room temperature. The heart-lung blocks were left in situ in an effort to simulate the cadaveric donor as closely as possible.
In the ischemia (I) group (n=8), the rats were ventilated for 120 minutes. In the passive exsanguination (PE) group (n=8), division of the inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta was performed for passive exsanguination at the beginning of the ventilation period. A median sternotomy was performed on the rats in the saline perfusion (SP) group (n=8) and the Perfadex perfusion (PP) group (n=8). The venae cavae were ligated, the abdominal aorta was divided, and a 20-gauge intravenous catheter was inserted into the main pulmonary artery. At room temperature, a physiological saline (0.9% NaCl) or Perfadex (with 1 mEq/l and 60mg CaCl2 added; Vitrolife Sweden, Kungsbacka, Sweden) solution was infused through this catheter from a reservoir positioned 30 cm above the heart until a clear perfusate was obtained from the divided aorta. The sternotomy and laparotomy were then stapled, and ventilation was continued for 120 minutes in both groups.[8,15]
After this warm ischemia period, the heart-lung blocks were harvested in all study groups via median sternotomy. The following steps were common in all six groups: the right hilar structures were clamped, the main pulmonary artery was catheterized as described above, and a left atriotomy was performed. Trypan blue dye dissolved in Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer (150 ml 500 mM) was infused, followed by 150 ml of fixative (2% gluteraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 mol/L Sorenson’s buffer), both from the reservoir positioned 30 cm above the heart. During this infusion, mechanical ventilation was established briefly in all the study groups with the same parameters previously used to permit perfusion of the left lung. The mid-portion of the left lung was then excised and stored at 4 °C in the same fixative used in the routine histological preparation.[4]
The right lung was resected and stored at -80 °C for subsequent measurement of MPO activity. The ROS formation in the tissue samples was monitored using a CL technique with luminol and lucigenin probes.
Measurement of myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity
Myeloperoxidase is a heme protein stored within the
azurophilic granules of leukocytes and found within
circulating neutrophils, monocytes, and some tissue
macrophages.[16,17] Tissue MPO activity is frequently
utilized to estimate tissue polymorphonuclear leukocyte
(PMN) accumulation in inflammed tissues, which
has been shown to correlate significantly with the
number of PMNs determined histochemically.[18] Tissueassociated
MPO activity was determined in 0.2 to
0.5 g samples that were homogenized in 10 volumes of
ice-cold potassium phosphate buffer [phosphate buffer
saline (PBS), 20 mM dipotassium hydrogen phosphate
(K2HPO4) pH 7.4]. The homogenate was centrifuged
at 12.000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant
was discarded. The pellet was then re-homogenized
with an equivalent volume of K2HPO4 containing 0.5%
(w/v) hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HETAB).
Myeloperoxidase activity was assessed by measuring the H2O2-dependent oxidation of o-dianizidine.2HCl.
One unit enzyme activity was defined as the amount of
MPO present that caused a change in absorbance of 1.0
unit/min at 460 nm and 37 °C and is expressed in units
per gram of tissue.[19]
Chemiluminescence (CL) assay
To assess the contribution of ROS in pulmonary
inflammation, luminol and lucigenin CLs were measured
as indicators of radical formation. Luminescence of
the tissue samples was recorded at room temperature
using a Mini Lumat Junior LB 9509 luminometer
(EG&G Berthold, Germany). Specimens were put into
vials containing a PBS–HEPES [4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-
piperazineethanesulfonic acid] buffer (0.5 mol/l PBS
containing 20 mmol/l HEPES, pH 7.2). The ROS were
quantitated after the addition of the enhancers, lucigenin
or luminol, for a final concentration of 0.2 mmol/l.
Counts were obtained at one-minute intervals, and
the results are given as the area under the curve for a
counting period of five minutes. Counts were corrected
for wet tissue weights and expressed as relative light
units (rlu) per milligram of tissue.
Histological evaluation of cell viability
For light microscopic analysis, samples from the lung
were dehydrated in an alcohol series, cleared in toluene,
and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (5 mm)
were stained with eosin only. Hematoxylin was avoided
because its blue color would have interfered with the
interpretation of the trypan blue dye.
Each glass slide was delineated into four quadrants and then viewed with a light microscope (Olympus BX 51, Tokyo, Japan) at x 400 magnification. The histological counting of the non-viable cells was performed by an experienced histologist who was unaware of either the control or experimental groups. In each section, five different areas were selected randomly, and 50 parenchymal cell nuclei were identified and counted in each of the four quadrants. The color of each nucleus was recorded. Cell nuclei were identified as either pink (viable) or blue (non-viable), with the latter color representing the trypan blue which stains the nuclei of non-viable cells. An eyepiece graticule (0.0785 mm2) was used to avoid overlapping of counting areas. The number of blue nuclei in each quadrant was added together, and a percentage was derived. The percentage of non-viable cells in each rat lung specimen was used to calculate the mean percentage of non-viability in each group.[4]
Statistical analysis
All data was expressed as mean ± standard error of
the mean (SEM). Groups of data were compared with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s
multiple comparison tests. Results were considered
significant when p was less than 0.05. Calculations were
made using GraphPad Prism 3.0 (GraphPad Software,
San Diego, CA, USA).
Chemiluminescence levels in the lung tissue
The lung luminol CL level showed a marked increase
in the I group (11.4±0.7 rlu/mg protein; p<0.001) when compared with the C group (6.3±0.6 rlu/mg protein).
Both the RE and PP groups abolished the elevation in
lung luminol CL (8.5±0.8 rlu/mg protein; p<0.05 and
7.3±0.7 rlu/mg protein; p<0.01, respectively). On the
other hand, neither the PE group (9.1±068 rlu/mg protein)
nor the SP group (9.4±1.0 rlu/mg protein) changed the
luminol CL levels (Figure 2).
The lucigenin CL level in the I group (7.9±0.4 rlu/mg tissue) was not different than the level in group C (6.8±1.2 rlu/mg tissue) while the level in the PE group (10.6±0.7 rlu/mg tissue) increased significantly when compared with the I group (p<0.05). In the RE group, the lucigenin CL level (6.5±0.3 rlu/mg tissue) was significantly lower than in the PE group (p<0.001) (Figure 3). On the other hand, the lucigenin CL levels in the perfusion groups were not significantly altered (saline, 9.7±0.6 rlu/mg tissue and Perfadex, 7.6±0.8 rlu/mg tissue), and the CL levels were not different from those of the C group either.
Histological analysis of cell viability
The two-hour warm ischemia period resulted in an
extensive number of non-viable cells (10.7±1.8%)
compared with the C group (0.5±0.2%; p<0.05),
(Figure 4). Non-viable cells were found to be extremely
high in the PE group (40.2±4.7%) when compared
with the I group (p<0.001). Similarly, there were high
numbers of non-viable cells recorded in the perfusion groups (saline, 27.0±3.6%; p<0.001) and (Perfadex,
20.7±2.2%; p<0.05). Fewer non-viable cells were found
in the RE group (7.5±1.9%) when compared with the
PE group (p<0.001), but the number of non-viable cells
was not different from that of the C or I groups, and the
perfusion groups did not differ from each other.
Microscopic examination of the C group revealed viable cells with pale pink nuclei in the lung parenchyma (Figure 5a). In the ischemia group, a slightly increased number of non-viable cells with blue nuclei was observed (Figure 5b). In the PE group, microscopic examination revealed a severely increased number of non-viable cells (Figure 5c). On the other hand, non-viable cells were mildly increased in the RE group, but this increase did not reach statistical significance (Figure 5d). Both the SP (Figure 5e) and PP (Figure 5f) groups showed a moderate increase in the number of non-viable cells in the lung parenchyma.
Almost all of the studies on ischemia-reperfusion injury in NHBDs are focused on the changes occurring in the reperfusion phase while the inflammatory and cellular changes during the warm ischemic period remain poorly understood.[21-24] Geudens et al.[7] showed that the cellular changes already occur during warm ischemia, and these were correlated with the length of the ischemic period in the mouse model. In this study, it was demonstrated that the number of macrophages and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage increases with longer warm ischemic intervals, and a significant rise occurs between 60 and 90 minutes of ischemia. In our study, we preferred a period of 120 minutes of warm ischemia for a demonstrative inflammatory reaction to produce ROS and investigate the effects on lung viability by measuring the MPO activity as well as the luminol- and lucigenin-enhanced CL on the lung tissue.
Reactive oxygen species are important contributors to tissue destruction. Although it is difficult to quantitate ROS because of their reactive nature and short lives, the CL method used in the present study is a simple and reproducible technique. The two CL probes, luminol and lucigenin, differ in selectivity. Lucigenin is particularly sensitive to superoxide radicals whereas luminol detects H2O2, OH-, the hypochlorite ion OCl-, peroxynitrite, and lipid peroxyl radicals.[14] The luminol-enhanced CL data of the current study demonstrates that a period of 120 minutes of warm ischemia involves toxic oxygen metabolites. Rapid exsanguination and Perfadex perfusion act as antioxidant methods to reduce the generation of ROS.
It is well documented that one of the sources of ROS in several lung injuries is the activated neutrophils.[25] The tissue associated MPO, which is known as the index of neutrophil infiltration, plays a fundamental role in oxidant production by neutrophils.[26] At the site of the ischemic injury, MPO content is a marker of the magnitude of neutrophil infiltration and activation and serves as a quantitative index of injury severity. In our observation, elevated MPO levels in the lung tissue indicate that neutrophil accumulation contributes to the ischemia-induced oxidative injury, and rapid exsanguination and Perfadex perfusion appear to have preventive effects through the inhibition of neutrophil infiltration. These findings are in parallel with the luminol-enhanced CL data, which defines the role of neutrophils in the release of ROS.
In accordance with the CL and MPO results, the percentage of non-viable cells in the RE group also decreased, although it did not reach statistical significance. The highest number of non-viable cells was in the PE group, which may be a sign of cell death due to the oxidative damage caused by the inflammatory cells and ROS in the remaining blood in the lung parenchyma. Tremblay et al.[27] showed in an isolated rat lung reperfusion model that a period of hypotension and hemorrhagic shock caused by exsanguination before death severely impairs cadaveric lung viability through activation and pulmonary sequestration of neutrophils along with the release of inflammatory mediators. However, our findings showed that rapid exsanguination may provide a total washout of the blood cells; leukocytes which cause inflammation, thrombocytes which bring about clot formation, and erythrocytes with strong oxidative agents, such as hemoglobin, from the lungs. Thus, there is less inflammatory reaction and ROS formation in situations where passive exsanguination after death is not sufficent enough to clear the inflammatory cells of the lungs. This results in a higher degree of ischemic injury.
In conclusion, this study examined the effects of rapid exsanguination on lung viability following warm ischemia. We showed that death following rapid exsanguination results in better preservation of lung viability and minimal oxidative injury. This may be due to the loss of inflammatory cells and platelets and the shift of extravascular fluid to the intravascular compartment. Further studies on this issue are needed for developing strategies to condition the NHBD lungs against ischemia-reperfusion injury. In clinical practice, these studies may lead to the conclusion that an NHBD lung harvested from a donor who “bled to death” rapidly can have a better outcome following transplantation.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect
to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Christie JD, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, Aurora P,
Dobbels F, Kirk R, et al. The Registry of the International
Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-seventh
official adult lung and heart-lung transplant report-2010. J
Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:1104-18.
2) Christie JD, Edwards LB, Aurora P, Dobbels F, Kirk R,
Rahmel AO, et al. Registry of the International Society for
Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-fifth official adult
lung and heart/lung transplantation report-2008. J Heart
Lung Transplant 2008;27:957-69.
3) Van Raemdonck DE, Rega FR, Neyrinck AP, Jannis N,
Verleden GM, Lerut TE. Non-heart-beating donors. Semin
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;16:309-21.
4) D'Armini AM, Roberts CS, Griffith PK, Lemasters JJ, Egan TM. When does the lung die? I. Histochemical evidence of
pulmonary viability after “death”. J Heart Lung Transplant
1994;13:741-7.
5) Alessandrini F, D’Armini AM, Roberts CS, Reddick RL,
Egan TM. When does the lung die? II. Ultrastructural
evidence of pulmonary viability after “death”. J Heart Lung
Transplant 1994;13:748-57.
6) D'Armini AM, Tom EJ, Roberts CS, Henke DC, Lemasters
JJ, Egan TM. When does the lung die? Time course of high
energy phosphate depletion and relationship to lung viability
after “death”. J Surg Res 1995;59:468-74.
7) Geudens N, Vanaudenaerde BM, Neyrinck AP, Van De
Wauwer C, Rega FR, Verleden GM, et al. Impact of warm
ischemia on different leukocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage
from mouse lung: possible new targets to condition the
pulmonary graft from the non-heart-beating donor. J Heart
Lung Transplant 2006;25:839-46.
8) Oto T, Calderone A, Pepe S, Snell G, Rosenfeldt F. Highflow
endobronchial cooled humidified air protects nonheart-
beating donor rat lungs against warm ischemia. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:413-9.
9) Steen S, Sjöberg T, Ingemansson R, Lindberg L. Efficacy
of topical cooling in lung preservation: is a reappraisal due?
Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:1657-63.
10) Sibille Y, Reynolds HY. Macrophages and polymorphonuclear
neutrophils in lung defense and injury. Am Rev Respir Dis
1990;141:471-501.
11) Gutteridge JM, Halliwell B. Free radicals and antioxidants in
the year 2000. A historical look to the future. Ann N Y Acad
Sci 2000;899:136-47.
12) Haklar G, Sayin-Ozveri E, Yüksel M, Aktan AO, Yalçin
AS. Different kinds of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species
were detected in colon and breast tumors. Cancer Lett
2001;165:219-24.
13) Boveris A, Cadenas E, Reiter R, Filipkowski M, Nakase Y,
Chance B. Organ chemiluminescence: noninvasive assay
for oxidative radical reactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1980;77:347-51.
14) Davies GR, Simmonds NJ, Stevens TR, Sheaff MT, Banatvala
N, Laurenson IF, et al. Helicobacter pylori stimulates antral
mucosal reactive oxygen metabolite production in vivo. Gut
1994;35:179-85.
15) Jones DR, Hoffmann SC, Sellars M, Egan TM. Reduced
ischemia-reperfusion injury with isoproterenol in non-heartbeating
donor lungs. J Surg Res 1997;69:385-92.
16) Yamada M, Kurahashi K. Regulation of myeloperoxidase
gene expression during differentiation of human myeloid
leukemia HL-60 cells. J Biol Chem 1984;259:3021-5.
17) Schultz J, Kaminker K. Myeloperoxidase of the leucocyte
of normal human blood. I. Content and localization. Arch
Biochem Biophys 1962;96:465-7.
18) Bradley PP, Priebat DA, Christensen RD, Rothstein G.
Measurement of cutaneous inflammation: estimation of
neutrophil content with an enzyme marker. J Invest Dermatol
1982;78:206-9.
19) Hillegass LM, Griswold DE, Brickson B, Albrightson-
Winslow C. Assessment of myeloperoxidase activity in
whole rat kidney. J Pharmacol Methods 1990;24:285-95.
20) Neyrinck AP, Van De Wauwer C, Geudens N, Rega FR,
Verleden GM, Wouters P, et al. Comparative study of donor
lung injury in heart-beating versus non-heart-beating donors.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:628-36.
21) Takashima S, Schlidt SA, Koukoulis G, Sevala M, Egan
TM. Isoproterenol reduces ischemia-reperfusion lung injury
despite beta-blockade. J Surg Res 2005;126:114-20.
22) Egan TM, Hoffmann SC, Sevala M, Sadoff JD, Schlidt
SA. Nitroglycerin reperfusion reduces ischemia-reperfusion
injury in non-heart-beating donor lungs. J Heart Lung
Transplant 2006;25:110-9.
23) Inokawa H, Sevala M, Funkhouser WK, Egan TM.
Ex-vivo perfusion and ventilation of rat lungs from nonheart-
beating donors before transplant. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1219-25.
24) Takashima S, Koukoulis G, Inokawa H, Sevala M, Egan
TM. Inhaled nitric oxide reduces ischemia-reperfusion
injury in rat lungs from non-heart-beating donors. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:132-9.
25) Ryrfeldt A, Bannenberg G, Moldéus P. Free radicals and lung
disease. Br Med Bull 1993;49:588-603.