In this article, we aimed to present an esophageal leiomyoma case that was examined due to dysphagia in which computed tomography of the thorax disclosed an image mimicking enlarged mediastinal lymph node.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), and esophagoscopy are the first procedures that come to mind for the differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in particular. Since our patient’s complaint was dysphagia and the mass seemed to invade the esophagus radiologically, we suspected that the lesion may have been of esophageal origin, although the tomographic image of the lesion in our patient resembled mediastinal lymphadenopathy caused by either lymphoma or sarcoidosis. For that reason, neither EUS nor EBUS was considered for the patient, and esophagoscopy was preferred. During the esophagoscopy, we observed a submucosally localized mass where the surfacing mucosa was smooth, leading us to think that the lesion was most likely benign. Thus, both for this reason and to avoid any tissue scarring, which may have caused issues in the surgical procedure we decided on straightforward surgery with no prior biopsy. In this context, a study conducted by Punpale et al.[3] indicated that if leiomyoma i s suspected during esophagoscopy, a biopsy should not be performed, as it may cause scarring at the biopsy site, hampering definitive extramucosal resection. Only an ulcerated growth should be biopsied to rule out malignancy.[3]
In the differential diagnosis of esophageal leiomyoma, the diagnostic value of needle aspiration biopsies harvested with EUS or EBUS is limited. Such biopsies taken from submucosal or intramural lesions are often not recommended, due to possible side effects such as complications and more challenging surgery.
Another condition that needs to be considered in differential diagnosis is leiomyosarcoma. Leiomyosarcomas of the esophagus are rare, malignant, smooth-muscle tumors with similar radiological characteristics as leiomyomas. It should be noted here that postoperative needle aspiration biopsies performed for diagnostic purposes are not effective in distinguishing these two lesions from one another pathologically. Additionally, in leiomyosarcomas, endoscopic biopsies might give a high false negative rate, especially in cases where the mucosa is intact.
With the increasing technological developments and experience in recent years, thoracoscopic methods have become the gold standard in the surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma, as in most chest surgeries. It is emphasized in the literature that single leiomyomas with a diameter smaller than 5 cm should be removed by the thoracoscopic method.[1,4] The fact that the leiomyoma was localized on the left of the esophagus in our patient did not constitute an obstacle for a thoracoscopic approach. After we suspended the esophagus from the proximal and distal sides of the mass, we dissected the lesion from the surrounding tissues. Because leiomyomas are localized in muscle layers and their binding with the surrounding tissues is rather loose, as in our patient, the enucleation procedure becomes easier. The size of the defect in the esophageal muscle layers in our patient was relatively large after the enucleation. We closed the muscle layers, thinking that if the muscle tissues of the esophagus were left open, the mucosal layer would be in direct contact with the thorax, and the negative pressure in the thorax, over time, could contribute to the development of a traction pseudodiverticulum in this region.[5,6]
In conclusion, esophageal leiomyoma may give a radiological appearance similar to mediastinal lymphadenopathy. To be minimally invasive, thoracoscopic enucleation of these tumors should be the first means attempted in surgical treatment, and the esophageal muscle layers should be closed at the end of the procedure to prevent possible complications.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to
the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.
1) Aydın Y, Yamac E, Aksoy M, Eroğlu A. Approach to
esophageal leiomyoma: a report of eight cases. Turk Gogus
Kalp Dama 2013;21:706-11.
2) Jang KM, Lee KS, Lee SJ, Kim EA, Kim TS, Han D, et
al. The spectrum of benign esophageal lesions: imaging
findings. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:199-210.
3) Punpale A, Rangole A, Bhambhani N, Karimundackal G,
Desai N, de Souza A, et al. Leiomyoma of esophagus. Ann
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;13:78-81.
4) Varer P, Yalçınkaya I, Kutlu CA. Özofagus leiomyomunun
torakoskopik enükleasyonu. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama
2013;21:516-9.