In this article, we present two case reports whose defects were successfully reconstructed with three-dimensional (3D), custom-made titanium implants (CTIs) using by this method.
Case 2- A 50-year-old male patient was admitted to our clinic with a mass filling the right hemithorax and anterior mediastinal area and protruded from the anterior chest wall (Figure 2). The pathological diagnosis of a Tru-cut biopsy was chondroid neoplasm. The mass was resected with lower half of the manubrium. The chest wall was stabilized by two titanium bridges and a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh. In the postoperative period, a flail chest and type 2 respiratory failure were encountered and, therefore, we decided to use CTI for reconstruction (Figure 3). A written informed consent was obtained from the patient. The implant was fixed to the upper half of manubrium using five titanium screws, and the costal extensions were sutured to the corresponding ribs (Figure 4). In the postoperative period, the paradoxical respiratory movement was terminated, and he was extubated on postoperative Day 5. The patient was discharged three weeks after surgery and followed without any problems at 10 months of discharge (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Postoperative chest X-ray of Case 2.
Design and manufacture of the prosthesis
Computed tomography (CT) images as Dicom
files were converted to stereolithography files, and
a 3D digital model was designed. The acrylonitrile
butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic prototype was
produced in the 3D printer according to this design.
After approval of the ABS model by the surgeon,
the digital 3D model was transferred to selective
metal laser sintering (SLS) machine. The titanium
implant was generated from powder Ti6Al4V ELI
Grade 23 under 99.9% argon atmosphere. Following
the production of structure, the implant was exposed
to heat in a special normalization oven. Once
burnishing and polishing processes were completed, the implant structure was sandblasted with 250,
110, and 50-micron particle size aluminum oxide
(AlO) particles. After sandblasting, the production
procedure was completed, and the implant was
sterilized by heat in an autoclave.
One of the most commonly used techniques is the sandwich method that involves placing MMA between two layers of the Marlex mesh.[3] Although this technique prolongs surgical duration and requires experience, it provides the rigidity needed to maintain respiratory function.[4] However, it is difficult to provide this structure with a concave shape that is specific to the chest wall. Disturbing complications such as pain and fracture have been reported previously.[4] In addition, fluid accumulation and infection can occur behind the implant due to the lack of permeable pores. Chapelier et al.[5] reported that four of 12 patients using a MMA-reinforced mesh developed major septic complications that later required removal of the implant.
The PTFE mesh which adapts well to the shape of the chest wall is a widely used material due to its flexibility. However, it has also several disadvantages, such as poor fibrovascular involvement in the surrounding tissue and low resistance to infection.[6] Titanium is an ideal material for prosthesis due to its low specific weight, corrosion resistance, tensile strength, high biocompatibility, and compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging.[7]
Three-dimensional prototyping technology by SLS technique has given promising results to surgeons who desire to increase the adaptation of the reconstruction material to respiratory mechanics and to produce the material closest to the original. The 3D model of the bones can be extracted from CT images to allow the surgeon to develop an understanding of the defect that would occur after resection and to design a patient-specific prosthesis. In this way, it is possible to eliminate the defect with a prosthesis produced like a one-to-one copy of the original. In 2013, Turna et al.[8] reported a case of reconstruction of a wide anterior chest wall resection involving the sternum and ribs using a CTI. In addition to the design of the prosthesis in this pioneering publication, designs which provide articulation and flexibility were reported as case reports.[9]
In both operations, there was no need to use a mesh to separate the mediastinum from the titanium implant due to the compact structure of the implant. The holes were designed to be compatible with titanium screws to help fit on the implant. The perforated design reduces the cost of the material, production duration, and weight. The perforated structure adheres better to tissues and enables drainage of the seroma that may form behind it. However, while planning this perforated structure, the resistance of the implant should not be impaired.
In conclusion, the availability of this technology which requires experience and pieces of equipment is currently limited. Besides, the cost is higher than that of conventional methods, and it requires more time to manufacture. Based on our experience, the defect formed after a wide resection of the anterior chest wall can be closed effectively and anatomically without disrupting respiratory functions using a titanium alloy prosthesis which is specially manufactured with three-dimensional prototyping technology by the selective laser sintering technique. We believe that patient-specific titanium prosthesis is a good alternative to non-allograft materials. However, further studies are needed to gain a better insight into this subject.
Acknowledgements
The titanium materials were designed and produced by Simel
Ayyıldız, Safi Serdar Çınar, Burcu Vardar, and İrem Balcı from
Gulhane Medical Design and Manufacturing Center. The authors
thank them for their signi?cant contribution to this study.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to
the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.
1) Lardinois D, Müller M, Furrer M, Banic A, Gugger M,
Krueger T, et al. Functional assessment of chest wall integrity
after methylmethacrylate reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg
2000;69:919-23.
2) Dingman RO, Argenta LC. Reconstruction of the chest wall.
Ann Thorac Surg 1981;32:202-8.
3) McCormack PM. Use of prosthetic materials in chest-wall
reconstruction. Assets and liabilities. Surg Clin North Am
1989;69:965-76.
4) Calvin CS Ng. Recent and future developments in chest
wall reconstruction. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2015;27:234-9.
5) Chapelier AR, Missana MC, Couturaud B, Fadel E, Fabre
D, Mussot S, et al. Sternal resection and reconstruction for
primary malignant tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1001-6.
6) Mahabir RC, Butler CE. Stabilization of the chest wall:
autologous and alloplastic reconstructions. Semin Plast Surg
2011;25:34-42.
7) Sanna S, Brandolini J, Pardolesi A, Argnani D, Mengozzi M,
Dell"Amore A, et al. Materials and techniques in chest wall
reconstruction: a review. J Vis Surg 2017;3:95.