Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2020, a total of 139 patients (95 males, 44 females) who underwent Norwood I procedure with the diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome in our center were retrospectively analyzed.
Results: The median birth weight was 3,200 (range, 3,000 to 3,350) g and the median age at the time of operation was seven (range, 5 to 10) days. Pulmonary flow was achieved with a Sano shunt in the majority (72%) of patients. Survival rate was 41% after the first stage. Reoperation for bleeding (p=0.017), reoperation for residual lesion (p=0.011), and postoperative peak lactate level (p=0.029), were associated with in-hospital mortality. Nineteen (33%) of 57 patients died before the second stage. Thirty-three (58%) patients underwent second stage, and survival after the second stage was 94%. Thirteen patients underwent third stage, and survival after the third stage was 85%. Estimated probability of survival at six months, and one, two, three, and four years were 33%, 33%, 25%, 25%, and 22% respectively.
Conclusion: Hospital and inter-stage mortality rates are still high and this seems to be the most challenging period in term of survival efforts of the patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Early recognition and reintervention of anatomical residual defects, close follow-up in the inter-stage period, and the accumulation of multidisciplinary experience may help to improve the results to acceptable limits.
In the present study, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of one of the largest series of our country and to identify the risk factors of mortality.
Preoperative management and surgical
technique
All patients received prostaglandin E1 (alprostadil
20 µg/mL) infusion between 0.005 and 0.1 µg/kg/min
doses preoperatively.[6] Oxygen saturation values of all
patients were monitored closely up to the operation.
The patients who were hemodynamically unstable
and received mechanical ventilation and inotropic
support. All surgical procedures were performed under
general anesthesia. After standard median sternotomy,
autologous pericardium was harvested. Both caval
veins and the innominate artery were cannulated.
Innominate artery was cannulated directly in patients
undergoing right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery
(RV-PA) shunt, whereas arterial cannulation was
performed with the help of a polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE) graft anastomosed to the innominate artery in patients undergoing Blalock-Taussig (BT) shunt.
In the last couple of years in the series, distal
perfusion was achieved by performing descending
aortic cannulation in most of the patients. In patients
who underwent arch reconstruction under antegrade
cerebral perfusion (ACP), systemic hypothermia at
28°C was used. In a small number of patients who
underwent total circulatory arrest (TCA) during aortic
arch reconstruction, 24°C systemic hypothermia
was preferred. In patients who underwent wholebody
perfusion with descending aortic cannulation
during the arch reconstruction, 32°C hypothermia
was preferred. Aortic arch reconstruction was
performed by using glutaraldehyde-fixed autologous
pericardium. Pulmonary flow was instituted through
a modified BT (mBT) shunt or an RV-PA shunt. As a
rule of thumb, RV-PA shunt was preferred in patients
with aortic atresia and/or ascending aortic diameter
less than 2 mm. In addition, the decision was made
according to the surgeon"s preference and patient"s
anatomy. Atrial septectomy was performed in all
patients. After completion of the surgery, sternum was
left open and skin tissue was closed primarily or by
sterile patch material in patients having myocardial
edema.
Follow-up and outcome events
Primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital
mortality and inter-stage mortality rates during the
follow-up. The other outcomes of interest were long-term
survival. Demographics and echocardiographic
findings were reviewed. The need for mechanical
ventilation and the initial blood lactate level in the
operation room were noted. Intraoperative perfusion
data and blood lactate levels, cerebral, myocardial,
end organ protection techniques, and type of shunt
were noted. Postoperative blood lactate levels were
reviewed and the peak value was noted on the first
day of postoperative follow-up. Complications such
as acute renal failure requiring dialysis, permanent
neurological deficit, atrioventricular (AV) block
requiring pacemaker implantation, requirement of
mechanical circulatory support, re-exploration for
bleeding, requirement of reintervention and length of
stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital were
also noted. In addition to hospital registry data, the
National Personal Health Record System was used to
confirm long-term survival.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM
SPSS version 21.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk,
NY, USA). The normality distribution of variables was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov/
Shapiro-Wilk tests. Data were expressed in mean
± standard deviation (SD) or median (min-max) for
continuous variables and in number and frequency
for categorical variables. Independent sample t-test
was or Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare
continuous variables and the Pearson chi-square
or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables.
Univariate and multivariate analyses using binary
logistic regression were performed to determine
independent predictors for dependent parameter.
To obtain a cut-off value and area under the curve
(AUC) for related parameters, the receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.
Survival curves and rates were obtained from the
Kaplan-Meier analysis. Ap value of < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Table 1: Baseline patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings
In addition to the Norwood I procedure, TAPVR repair was performed in four patients and cor triatriatum repair was performed in one patient concomitantly. Aortic arch reconstruction was performed under TCA in nine (7%) patients and the median duration of TCA was 45 (range, 25 to 56) min. In 130 (94%) patients, arch reconstruction was performed under ACP and the median duration of ACP was 66 (range, 49 to 85) min. In 19 of these patients, in addition to ACP, lower body was perfused by descending aortic cannulation. In the subgroup analysis between the groups with and without descending aortic perfusion, intraoperative maximal blood lactate level was found to be significantly lower in the descending aorta perfusion group (p=0.023). The median cross-clamp and bypass time were 75 (range, 54 to 105) min and 163 (range, 136 to 205) min, respectively. The RV-PA (Sano) shunt was preferred to provide pulmonary flow in the majority (72%) of the patients. Sternal closure was delayed in all of patients routinely. All operative data are listed in Table 2.
Table 2: Operative and postoperative data
According to the univariate logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality after first stage, requirement of mechanical ventilation preoperatively, blood lactate levels, reoperation for bleeding, reintervention for residual defect or shunt and need to ECMO support were statistically significant higher in the non-survivors group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the aortic diameters, additional cardiac anomalies, tricuspid valvular insufficiency, descending aortic perfusion and type of shunt.
The postoperative peak blood lactate level was found to be an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Thirteen (9.4%) patients required reoperation for bleeding in the early postoperative period. Early postoperative reintervention was needed in 16 (11.5%) patients. These two parameters were also found to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality (Table 3).
Table 3: Multivariate analysis of factors predicting mortality
The reasons for reinterventions were shunt stenosis in 10 patients, pulmonary over-flow in two patients, restrictive interatrial communication in one patient, pulmonary branch stenosis in two patients, and residual coarctation in one patient.
Fifty-four (39%) patients required peritoneal dialysis treatment due to excessive edema and/or acute kidney injury. Twenty-seven (19%) of the patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Indications for ECMO support were low cardiac output (LCO) in 18 patients, hypoxia due to shunt dysfunction in six patients, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in three patients. Only two of them (7%) could be weaned from ECMO and survived. Diaphragmatic plication procedure was done in six (4%) patients who had phrenic nerve paralysis. Tracheostomy was performed in 13 (9%) patients, due to the inability to wean from mechanical ventilation. Apart from a patient with congenital hydrocephalus, permanent neurological deficits were not observed in any patient. The median duration of ICU and hospital stay after operation were 14 (range, 1 to 25) and 16 (range, 1 to 29) days for all patients, respectively and 25 (range, 15 to 41) and 29 (range, 22 to 46) days for survivors, respectively. In-hospital mortality was observed in 82 (59%) of all patients.
In the ROC curve analysis, intraoperative final lactate level (sampled at the end of the operation) had the largest AUC (0.794, Figure 1) to estimate the hospital mortality. The cut-off value was 7.75 mmol/L with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 71%. Of note, in our series, an initial lactate level (at anesthesia induction) higher than 4.5 mmol/L indicated mortality with a specificity of 100%, despite sensitivity of 20% (Table 4, Figure 1).
Table 4: ROC analysis of lactate levels for mortality
The follow-up was complete for 99% of the patients. One patient was lost to follow-up after 13 months in the first inter-stage period. In this period, three patients required reintervention. Balloon aortoplasty was performed in two patients due to re-coarctation of aorta and one patient required balloon angioplasty for stenosis of mBT shunt and left pulmonary artery (LPA). Nineteen (33%) of 57 patients died during the first inter-stage period who were discharged after Norwood I. Four patients were still waiting for the second stage.
The second stage operation were performed in 33 patients. In addition to the bidirectional cavopulmonary connection procedure, arch reconstruction was performed in four patients due to re-coarctation of aorta and tricuspid valve repair was performed in one patient due to severe valvular insufficiency concomitantly. The median age of the patients was nine (range, 7 to 12) months. Thirty-one of them were discharged and in-hospital mortality was observed in two (6%) patients.
In the second, inter-stage period, four patients underwent LPA stenting due to proximal LPA stenosis. Three (10%) of thirty-one patients died during the second inter-stage period. Fifteen patients were still waiting for the third stage.
The third stage operation were performed in 13 patients. The median age of the patients at stage III was 47 (range, 47 to 50) months. In the early postoperative period, left and right pulmonary artery (RPA) stenting was performed to relieve LPA and RPA stenosis in one patient. Eleven of them were discharged, and hospital mortality was observed in two patients. Balloon aortoplasty and RPA stenting were performed in one patient in the post-stage III period. The estimated probability of survival at six months, and one, two, three, and four years were 33%, 33%, 25%, 25%, and 22% respectively (Figure 2).
Unfortunately, as seen in the Kaplan-Meier curve (Figure 2), only one in five (22%) patients could reach the age of five, predominantly due to the in-hospital and first inter-stage mortality. High mortality and morbidity rates similar to our series have also been reported in the literature.[7] The single digit mortality rates reported from experienced centers were achieved by learning from their mistakes by surgical modifications, new strategies and improved multidisciplinary perioperative care.[8] As we understand from our early experience and the reports from other institutes, the mortality and morbidity rates of clinics can be quite high, when they are in the learning curve for Norwood surgery[9,10] and it can be speculated that Norwood surgery is still in the development phase in our country.[11-13] However, early mortality after Norwood surgery still stands out as the most important problem that needs to be tackled.
Considering the promising results from expert centers, we questioned if the hybrid procedure could be an option to improve survival. There are clinics in the world that have adopted hybrid procedure as the primary palliation method and have achieved favorable results. According to the Giessen team, interventional procedures should only be optimized by using innovative self-expandable stents and close follow-up is very important in the inter-stage period.[14] However short- and long-term outcomes of hybrid procedures have shown great variability including some very unfavorable results.[15] In Turkey, Erek et al.[11] reported the comparison of surgical and hybrid Norwood procedures and showed that the hybrid approach did not have promising results. Discouraging results were obtained in our attempts as well, five of six patients died in the early period and one died in the inter-stage period. The difficulty in obtaining special interventional materials and following-up closely in the inter-stage period (due to the fact that majority of the patients living in rural areas) are seen as the most important obstacles to the success of the hybrid method for our patient population.
In our series, reoperation due to bleeding and unplanned reintervention were found to be the main predictors of mortality. This finding can imply that the high mortality is mostly related to surgical complications. However, the results of a recent article published by Boston Children's Hospital group[16] contradict this situation. In this article, the authors analyzed the results of 500 Norwood surgeries performed over 20 years by classifying them according to their technical performance score (TPS). Considering the results of the study, even in the group with the worst TPS, that is, the group with many residual defects, the mortality rate was 32%, which is lower than our series. Remarkably, in the results of the Boston group,[16] the subgroup of patients with the worst TPS score had an 89% rate of unplanned reintervention, which was significantly higher than in our series. This indicates that the residual lesions are not uncommon even in the most experienced centers. Effective detection and timely correction of them may be a primary goal to improve Norwood I outcomes.
High lactate levels have been reported in the literature as a predictor of poor prognosis. In our series, the postoperative first day peak serum lactate level was found to be an independent predictor of mortality. Murtuza et al.[17] reported that the inability to clear blood lactate to less than 6.76 mmol/L within 24 h after Norwood I surgery was highly predictive of early mortality. Also in our series, in the ROC analysis performed to find out which lactate level was associated with mortality, the highest AUC value was found to be intraoperative final lactate level and the cut-off value was 7.75 mmol/L. In another study, the postoperative peak lactate level within the first 48 h was found to be a risk factor for the need of ECMO support.[18] In the light of these findings, it can be concluded that lactate level is an important predictor of prognosis; however, it is worth investigating whether definitive clinical algorithms can be established using these cutoff values. Our current practice in our clinic is the use of ECMO in the presence of hemodynamic instability with high lactate levels as a result of low cardiac output syndrome. On the other hand, considering that mortality is very high in patients under ECMO, it would be more rational to create a better preoperative and intraoperative strategy not to increase lactate levels that would require ECMO support. In the light of this view, all-region perfusion strategies including coronary and distal perfusion have been experienced in different clinics.[19,20] To achieve better tissue perfusion and lower lactate levels, in most of the patients who were recently operated in our clinic, distal perfusion was provided by cannulation of the descending aorta during the arch reconstruction phase. There was no significant difference in the early mortality and morbidity rates between the descending aortic cannulation subgroup and the others. However, when the lactate levels were examined, the intraoperative peak lactate level was significantly lower in the descending aortic cannulation subgroup. This technique continues to be used in our clinic, considering its potential benefits.
The first inter-stage period is a very risky time period in terms of acute hemodynamic decompensation. In this period, close follow-up of the patients is of utmost importance. According to the literature, interstage mortality rate ranges from 2 to 20%.[21] This rate was found to be higher than the literature in our series. The possible reason is that most of our patients have inhabited at the rural area having lack of fully equipped pediatric heart center. In the light of literature data, the mortality more often occurs within the first 24 h after the first symptom in the inter-stage period.[22] Even though, the admission of patient to the hospital may be delayed within 24 h, even if the patient resides in the city center. In some experienced centers, home surveillance system and in-hospital inter-stage follow-up algorithms have developed to solve this problem.[23,24] In our clinic, as imilar organization has been implemented recently. The parents were recommended to obtain a portable pulse oximeter and a baby scale to record the oxygen saturation and the weight of the patient daily. They also recorded the amount of feeding and urine output. In general, patients are given certain criteria and are advised to call the hospital if any of these criteria are breached. Our aim with the home surveillance system is to reduce the inter-stage mortality. The outcomes of this approach in our cohort have not been analyzed, yet.
The main limitation of this study is its singlecenter, retrospective design. In addition, only basic data were available about preoperative condition and data such as inotrope score, cardiac output, and sepsis were unable to be reached. Furthermore, changes in surgical technique, depending on the learning period of our center or the surgeon"s preference may have affected the outcomes.
In conclusion, we particularly consider that our study with the large patient population reflects the situation of outcomes of Norwood procedure in our country. Although some improvement has been achieved in time, the most important problems are still high early postoperative and inter-stage mortality after stage I in our setting. Perfusion strategies focusing on providing better tissue perfusion and keeping lactate levels lower and more aggressive postoperative follow-up for early recognition and early reintervention of anatomical residual defects may help to improve the outcomes. We believe that our newly launched home surveillance system would decrease the inter-stage mortality rates.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to
the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.
1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Hospital
stays, hospital charges, and in-hospital deaths among infants
with selected birth defects--United States, 2003. MMWR
Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56:25-9.
2) Norwood WI, Lang P, Hansen DD. Physiologic repair of
aortic atresia-hypoplastic left heart syndrome. N Engl J Med
1983;308:23-6.
3) Miyazaki S, Miyaji K, Itatani K, Oka N, Goto S, Nakamura
M, et al. Surgical strategy for aortic arch reconstruction after
the Norwood procedure based on numerical flow analysis.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018;26:460-7.
4) Sano S, Ishino K, Kawada M, Arai S, Kasahara S, Asai T,
et al. Right ventricle-pulmonary artery shunt in first-stage
palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:504-9.
5) Galantowicz M, Cheatham JP. Lessons learned from the
development of a new hybrid strategy for the management of
hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 2005;26:190-9.
6) Yucel IK, Cevik A, Bulut MO, Dedeoğlu R, Demir İH,
Erdem A, et al. Efficacy of very low-dose prostaglandin E1
in duct-dependent congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young
2015;25:56-62.
7) García-Hernández JA, González-Rodríguez JD, Martínez-
López AI, Canalejo-González D, Romero-Parreño A, Santos
de Soto J, et al. Experience with the Norwood operation
for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol
2007;60:732-8. Spanish.
8) Kobayashi Y, Kotani Y, Kuroko Y, Kawabata T, Sano
S, Kasahara S. Norwood procedure with right ventricle
to pulmonary artery conduit: A single-centre 20-year
experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;58:230-6.
9) Bu'Lock FA, Stümper O, Jagtap R, Silove ED, De Giovanni
JV, Wright JG, et al. Surgery for infants with a hypoplastic
systemic ventricle and severe outflow obstruction: Early
results with a modified Norwood procedure. Br Heart J
1995;73:456-61.
10) Azakie T, Merklinger SL, McCrindle BW, Van Arsdell
GS, Lee KJ, Benson LN, et al. Evolving strategies and
improving outcomes of the modified Norwood procedure:
A 10-year single-institution experience. Ann Thorac Surg
2001;72:1349-53.
11) Erek E, Aydın S, Temur B, Önalan MA, Suzan D, İyigün M,
et al. Outcomes of hybrid and Norwood Stage I procedures for the treatment of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and
its variants. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg
2020;28:282-93.
12) Başaran M, Tunçer E, Güzelmeriç F, Cine N, Oner N,
Yildirim A, et al. Introduction to a Norwood program in an
emerging economy: Learning curve of a single center. Heart
Surg Forum 2013;16:E313-8.
13) Erek E, Yalçınbaş YK, Sarıosmanoğlu N, Özkan M, Yıldız O,
Şenkaya I, et al. First harvest of pediatric and congenital heart
surgery multicenter database in Turkey: Novel application of
real-time online reporting. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart
Surg 2021;12:377-86.
14) Schranz D, Bauer A, Reich B, Steinbrenner B, Recla S,
Schmidt D, et al. Fifteen-year single center experience with
the "Giessen Hybrid" approach for hypoplastic left heart and
variants: Current strategies and outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol
2015;36:365-73.
15) Alphonso N, Angelini A, Barron DJ, Bellsham-Revell H,
Blom NA, Brown K, et al. Guidelines for the management of
neonates and infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome:
The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
(EACTS) and the Association for European Paediatric and
Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Hypoplastic Left Heart
Syndrome Guidelines Task Force. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2020;58:416-99.
16) Michalowski AK, Gauvreau K, Kaza A, Quinonez L,
Hoganson D, Del Nido P, et al. Technical performance score:
A predictor of outcomes after the Norwood procedure. Ann
Thorac Surg 2021;112:1290-7.
17) Murtuza B, Wall D, Reinhardt Z, Stickley J, Stumper O,
Jones TJ, et al. The importance of blood lactate clearance as a predictor of early mortality following the modified Norwood
procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:1207-14.
18) Friedland-Little JM, Hirsch-Romano JC, Yu S, Donohue
JE, Canada CE, Soraya P, et al. Risk factors for
requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support
after a Norwood operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2014;148:266-72.
19) Karavas AN, Deschner BW, Scott JW, Mettler BA, Bichell DP.
Three-region perfusion strategy for aortic arch reconstruction
in the Norwood. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1138-40.
20) Siffring T, Prabhu N, Evans A, Dauch W, Smigla G,
Kaemmer D. Sustained Total All-Region (STAR) perfusion:
An optimized perfusion strategy for Norwood reconstruction.
J Extra Corpor Technol 2020;52:332-6.
21) Ghanayem NS, Allen KR, Tabbutt S, Atz AM, Clabby
ML, Cooper DS, et al. Interstage mortality after the
Norwood procedure: Results of the multicenter Single
Ventricle Reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2012;144:896-906.
22) Feinstein JA, Benson DW, Dubin AM, Cohen MS, Maxey
DM, Mahle WT, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome:
Current considerations and expectations. J Am Coll Cardiol
2012;59(1 Suppl):S1-42.