Methods: Eighteen Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into three equal groups: 1) control group; 2) ischemia-reperfusion group which underwent clamping of the carotid artery for 20 min; and 3) ischemiareperfusion + glutamine group which was treated with two doses of glutamine (1 g/kg) prior to the same clamping procedure as the ischemia-reperfusion group. All rats were sacrificed 24 h after the experiment. Their brain tissue was removed, separated into right and left hemispheres, and sent for analysis. Biochemical analysis was used to determine the oxidant parameters, antioxidant parameters, and glutathione levels in brain tissue. In the histopathological analysis of the brain tissue, ischemic markers such as red neurons, spongiosis, and satellitosis were examined.
Results: Biochemical examination revealed that the levels of malondialdehyde and ferric reducing antioxidant power in the ischemia-reperfusion group were significantly higher than those in the control and ischemia-reperfusion + glutamine groups (p<0.05). The histopathological findings revealed that the levels of red neurons, satellitosis, and spongiosis in the ischemia-reperfusion group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p<0.05). The red neuron and spongiosis levels in the ischemia-reperfusion + glutamine group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Our study findings indicate that glutamine treatment has a protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion-induced brain damage in rats.
Cerebral ischemia is a common pathology all over the world, with high rates of mortality and severe disability. About 85% of strokes are ischemic.[3] Treating cerebral ischemia with neuron-protective therapy reduces cell damage by altering the pathophysiological process of IR injury.[4]
Glutamine is a non-essential amino acid produced in the body. Experimental studies have shown that it becomes essential in catabolic conditions.[5] As an important source of energy and essential for protein synthesis and cellular protective systems, it is a precursor for the synthesis of glutathione (GSH), a major antioxidant.[6] Glutamine protects against IR injury by increasing heat shock proteins in the tissue and directly reducing nitric oxide synthase, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and proinflammatory cytokines.[7]
In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of glutamine, particularly its role in reducing neuronal damage and protecting against IR damage, in rats subjected to cerebral IR by bilateral carotid occlusion.
Operative technique
The rats were placed on the operating table in
the supine position, and the midline of the neck was
shaved. A midline incision was made. The rats in
the control group underwent a subcutaneous incision
and were left under surgical stress. At the end of
this period, the skin was closed. The rats in the
IR and IR + glutamine treatment groups underwent
the same surgical procedure, until the superficial
microdissection was performed. Following the
subcutaneous incision, the common carotid arteries
were found, freed, and restored using silk sutures.
Five minute after intraperitoneal administration of
100 U/kg heparin, the common carotid arteries
were occluded with bulldog clamps for 20 min.
Reperfusion was achieved by removing the bulldog
clamps from the carotid arteries and confirmed by
observing the pulsation of the translucent carotid
artery. The skin was, then, closed. Three days before
the procedure, the rats in the IR + glutamine group
received an intraperitoneal injection of the first
dose of glutamine (1 g/kg; Dipeptiven® 200 mg/mL,
Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany); the second
dose was administered 30 min before the procedure.
The rats that awakened from the anesthesia were
kept alive for 24 h. Then, all rats were sacrificed
by an intraperitoneal injection of 135 mg/kg of
sodium pentothal (Pental Sodyum, İ.E.U. Turkish
Pharmaceutical Co., Istanbul, Türkiye). Their brain
tissue was removed, separated into right and left
hemispheres, and sent for biochemical analysis and
pathological examination.
Biochemical evaluation
Tissue samples: The brain tissues were
washed in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) and
homogenized in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline
(0.01 M, pH: 7.4). The tissue homogenates were
centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min at 4°C to remove
any remaining non-homogenized tissue fragments
and nuclear fractions. Supernatant fractions were
used for biochemical analysis of the brain tissues.
The SOD and GSH peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities
were determined in the post-mitochondrial fractions
of the tissues, which were separated by sequential
centrifugation. In brief, tissue homogenates were
centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min at 4°C to remove crude
fractions. The supernatants were, then, centrifuged at
10,000 g for 20 min to obtain the post-mitochondrial
fractions. The materials were stored at -80°C, until
the analysis could be performed.
Determination of lipid peroxide levels: Brain lipid peroxidation was evaluated by determining thiobarbituric acid reactive substance levels. This was achieved by mixing 0.5 mL tissue samples, 0.5 mL distilled water, and 2 mL Buege-Aust reagent (26 mmol/L thiobarbituric acid and 0.92 mol/L trichloroacetic acid in 0.25 mol/L HCl) and heating the mixture in a boiling water bath for 15 min. The mixture was cooled and centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant was recorded at 532 nm. The breakdown product of 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane was used as the standard. The results were expressed as nmoL/mg protein.[8]
Determination of the advanced oxidation products of protein (AOPP) levels: To determine the AOPP levels, 40 mL of diluted brain homogenates and 160 mL of 0.2 M citric acid were put into microplate wells as the sample. Reagent blank (190 mL of 0.2 M citric acid and 10 mL of 1.16 M KI) and standard (190 mL chloramine-T as 0-100 mM in 0.2 M citric acid and 10 mL of 1.16 M KI) samples were prepared in different wells. After 2 min, the absorbance levels of the samples and standards were read at 340 nm against a reagent blank. The results were standardized by the formation of triiodide ions following the oxidation of potassium iodide with chloramine-T. The results were expressed as nmoL/mg protein.[9]
Determination of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels: Brain ROS g eneration was m easured u sing a fluorometric assay with dichlorofluorescein (DCF). In this assay, 1 mM 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluoresce in diacetate (DCFH2-DA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) diffuses passively into the cells, and the DCFH2-DA acetate groups are cleaved by intracellular esterase enzymes, yielding intracellular 2'7'-DCFH2. Reactive oxygen species oxidize DCFH2 to form a fluorescent compound, 2/,7/-DCF, which was measured using a microplate fluorometer (Fluoroskan Ascent FL; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with an excitation of 485 nm and an emission of 538 nm. The results were expressed as relative fluorescence units (RFUs).[10]
Determination of ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP): In the FRAP assay, a ferric-tripyridyltriazine (Fe3+-TPTZ) complex was reduced to its ferrous form and monitored by measuring the change in absorbance at 593 nm. The results were expressed as nmoL/mg protein.[11]
Determination of GSH levels: The GSH levels in the brain homogenates were measured spectrophotometrically using 5,5/-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoate) at 412 nm. The results were expressed as nmoL/mg protein.[12]
Determination of brain enzymatic antioxidants: The SOD activity was measured as the increase in the riboflavin-sensitized photooxidation of o-dianisidine. The assay mixture, containing potassium phosphate buffer (50 mmol/L, pH 7.8), 0.39 mmol/L riboflavin, 6 mmol/L o-dianisidine dihydrochloride, and post-mitochondrial fraction, was illuminated with 20 W fluorescent lamps at 37°C for 8 min. Absorbance readings were taken before and after 8 min of illumination at 460 nm. The SOD activity was calculated as the difference in the recorded absorbance levels. The results were expressed as units per mg of protein.[13]
The GSH-Px activity was measured using the Lawrence and Burk's[14] method. In the presence of GSH reductase and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), oxidized GSH was reduced by oxidizing NADPH. The change in absorbance was followed spectrophotometrically at 340 nm at 37°C. The results were expressed as nmoL/mg protein.[14]
Determination of protein levels: Protein levels in brain homogenates were assayed using bicinchoninic acid, with serum albumin as the standard.[15]
Histopathological evaluation with hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E)
The brains were kept in pre-prepared separate
jars for five days for fixation in a 10% formaldehyde
solution that was adjusted to 10 times the amount for
each sample. Three pieces of 2-mm-thick coronal
sections were taken from each of the gross brain
specimens, individually labelled, and embedded in
paraffin blocks. To facilitate the evaluation of each
block, at least three 2-micron-thick sections were
taken from each block, and the prepared tissue
samples were stained with H&E. Neuronal damage
was found to have occurred in the cerebral cortex
and hippocampal regions after cerebral ischemia.
The histomorphological appearance of red neurons,
characterized by acidophilic neuronal cytoplasm,
pyknosis, and karyorrhexis, was observed in the
damaged neurons. The presence of satellitosis
(oligodendrocytes collected around damaged neurons)
and spongiosis (spongy separation in the neuropil) in
the brain tissue was evaluated. While evaluating
this damage, damaged neurons were counted in
five different areas under the light microscope,
and the number of damaged neurons per 1 higher
magnification area was determined.[16]
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was evaluated using the IBM
SPSS version 21.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk,
NY, USA). Descriptive data were expressed
in median (min-max) or number and frequency,
where applicable. Data distributions and test of
normality were investigated using the Kolmogorov-
Smirnov test. The significance between groups
for parameters without normal distribution was
compared by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. In case of
significant difference between the groups, two-way
comparisons were completed by using Bonferronicorrected
Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations
between continuous variables were analyzed using
the Spearman correlation analysis. A p value of <0.05
was considered statistically significant.
A statistically significant increase in MDA levels, the indicator of lipid peroxidation in oxidative stress, was observed in the IR group compared to the control group (p<0.05). Glutamine treatment significantly decreased the MDA levels (p<0.05). In the rats in the IR group, FRAP levels were increased to compensate for oxidative stress. Glutamine treatment reduced this increase to the level observed in the rats in the control group (p<0.05). The SOD, GSH-Px, and GSH levels were analyzed to examine which parameter arose from the increase in total antioxidant capacity. The SOD and GSH-Px levels were found to be unchanged in the IR group, although their GSH levels were increased; however, this change was not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Histopathological findings
Histopathological findings, such as red neurons,
satellitosis, and spongiosis, in the brain tissue and
the median values for each group are presented in
Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 1. An assessment
of the values of the histopathological findings
specific to each group revealed that the levels of red
neurons, satellitosis, and spongiosis in the IR group were significantly higher than those in the control
group (p<0.05). The red neuron and spongiosis
values for the IR + glutamine treatment group were
significantly higher than those of the control group
(p=0.001, p=0.003, and p=0.001, respectively).
Correlations between biochemical and
histopathological findings
The correlations between biochemical and
histopathological findings are presented in Table 3.
There were moderately positive correlations between the
red neuron values and those of MDA and FRAP, and a
very strong positive correlation between the satellitosis
and spongiosis values (p<0.05, r=0.52/0.578). Strong
positive correlations were found between the spongiosis
value (p<0.01, r=0.615/0.693) and the MDA and FRAP
values and between the spongiosis and satellitosis
values (p<0.01, r=0.885/0.902) (Figure 2).
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between histopathological findings and biochemical results
The literature includes many clinical and experimental studies on drugs and methods which may protect the brain by reducing IR damage. Several studies have shown that glutamine reduces IR damage in many tissues and organs, but there are a limited number of studies that have shown its effects on IR injury in brain tissue.[20]
In the current study, we used Wistar albino rats as the experimental animal model, as small rodents, particularly rats, are preferred in constructing the cerebral ischemia model due to their similarity to human cerebral physiology and vascularization. The rodents" small brain masses also provide good fixation in procedures, such as paraffin embedding and frozen sectioning.[21] We found the rat model appropriate owing to its cost, easy maintenance, and intervention advantages.
Ugurlucan et al.[22] demonstrated that intraperitoneal administration of glutamine at a dose of 1 g/kg in the diabetic rats increased heat shock protein 70 levels significantly in cardiovascular tissues compared to those of the control group, proving its protective effect on cardiovascular tissues. Salman et al.[23] also showed a significant decrease in tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 levels in damaged lung tissue in rats given 1 g/kg of oral glutamine, as well as a significant decrease in the total lung injury score on histopathological examination. Similarly, Xu et al.[24] found statistically significant differences in GSH, MPO, and MDA levels in liver function tests after oral administration of 5 mg/kg glutamine following liver injury in rats. In addition, significant differences were also reported in IL-1β, intracellular adhesion molecule levels, and histopathological evaluations. In the present study, we administered glutamine intraperitoneally in two doses of 1 g/kg. We preferred the intraperitoneal route, as it makes it easier to adjust doses and does not require additional procedures for application.[22]
Vasconcelos et al.[24] induced cerebral ischemia in rats by clamping the common carotid artery for 30 min and they, then, performed reperfusion by removing the clamp. The glutamine administered was found to have statistically significantly altered the red neuron scores and water content of the brain tissue. In our study, we chose the global ischemia model, as it causes more pronounced and widespread ischemia than cerebral ischemia models. We implemented a longer reperfusion time (24 h) to allow ischemic histopathological changes in neurons to occur.
In our study, when we conducted a histopathological examination of the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, the areas of the brain most sensitive to ischemia, by staining the brain tissue with H&E, we found that the levels of red neurons and spongiosis increased statistically significantly in the IR group compared to those of the control group and decreased statistically significantly in the IR + glutamine group. We found that the satellitosis values of both the IR and IR + glutamine groups were higher than that of the control group. However, the comparison of the IR and IR + glutamine treatment groups was not statistically significant.
The MDA, a lipid peroxidation product, is used as a biomarker of oxidative stress.[9] In our study, MDA levels were found to be statistically significantly higher in the IR group compared to the control group. Glutamine treatment was found to statistically decrease MDA levels. We also found the levels of AOPP, an indicator of proteins damaged in oxidative stress,[9] to be higher in the IR group than in the control group, but lower in the IR + glutamine group than the IR group; however, these findings were not statistically significant.
Regarding antioxidant status in the brain tissues of our experimental model, we found a statistically significant increase in the FRAP levels in the IR group, which compensated for the increase in oxidative stress. However, glutamine treatment significantly reduced this increase.
According to the correlation between histopathological findings and biochemical parameters, we found positive correlations, particularly between FRAP and MDA levels and the numbers of ischemic neurons. This finding supports the conclusion that glutamine therapy protects against IR damage.
Nonetheless, the lack of clinical and electrophysiological examinations in animals after the experiment is the main limitation to this study.
In conclusion, our study results indicate that ischemia-reperfusion damages brain tissue and glutamine treatment protects against this damage. Based on these results, the next step should be to conduct clinical trials. Such trials are needed to ensure that glutamine is safe for clinical use, particularly in human patients who suffer from or are at risk of cerebral ischemia.
Acknowledgements: The study is the residency thesis of Shiralan Bakhshaliyev, MD.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was approval was obtained from the Istanbul University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee (01/2017-39785).
Data Sharing Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author Contributions: Idea/concept: S.B., C.K., N.B.; Design: S.B., C.K.; Control/supervision: C.K., S.D.A.; Data collection and interpretation: S.B., EA., GC., M.A.O., K.A., C.C.S., T.K.; Literature review: S.B., E.A., GC., M.A.O., K.A., C.C.S.; Writing the article: S.B., C.K., Critical review: S.B., C.K., S.D.A.; References and fundings: S.B., E.A.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The study was supported by the Istanbul University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (Project ID: 24408).
1) Li C, Jackson RM. Reactive species mechanisms of cellular
hypoxia-reoxygenation injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
2002;282:C227-41.
2) Acworth IN, Bailey B. Reactive oxygen species. In: Acworth
IN, Bailey B, editors. The handbook of oxidative metabolism.
Massachusetts: ESA Inc., 1997. p. 1-4.
3) Sveinsson OA, Kjartansson O, Valdimarsson EM. Cerebral
ischemia/infarction - epidemiology, causes and symptoms.
Laeknabladid 2014;100:271-9.
4) Yamashita T, Abe K. Recent progress in therapeutic strategies
for ischemic stroke. Cell Transplant 2016;25:893-8.
5) Miller AL. Therapeutic considerations of L-glutamine: A
review of the literature. Altern Med Rev 1999;4:239-48.
6) Tapiero H, Mathé G, Couvreur P, Tew KD. II. Glutamine and
glutamate. Biomed Pharmacother 2002;56:446-57.
7) Wischmeyer PE, Kahana M, Wolfson R, Ren H, Musch
MM, Chang EB. Glutamine reduces cytokine release, organ
damage, and mortality in a rat model of endotoxemia. Shock
2001;16:398-402.
8) Buege JA, Aust SD. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods
Enzymol 1978;52:302-10.
9) Hanasand M, Omdal R, Norheim KB, Gøransson LG, Brede
C, Jonsson G. Improved detection of advanced oxidation
protein products in plasma. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:901-6.
10) Wang H, Joseph JA. Quantifying cellular oxidative stress
by dichlorofluorescein assay using microplate reader. Free
Radic Biol Med 1999;27:612-6.
11) Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma
(FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": The FRAP
assay. Anal Biochem 1996;239:70-6.
12) Beutler E, Duron O, Kelly BM. Improved method for
the determination of blood glutathione. J Lab Clin Med
1963;61:882-8.
13) Mylroie AA, Collins H, Umbles C, Kyle J. Erythrocyte
superoxide dismutase activity and other parameters of copper
status in rats ingesting lead acetate. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
1986;82:512-20.
14) Lawrence RA, Burk RF. Glutathione peroxidase activity in
selenium-deficient rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun
1976;71:952-8.
15) Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner
FH, Provenzano MD, et al. Measurement of protein using
bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 1985;150:76-85.
16) M?rg?ritescu O, Mogoant? L, Pirici I, Pirici D, Cernea D,
M?rg?ritescu C. Histopathological changes in acute ischemic
stroke. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2009;50:327-39.
17) Güler M, Ulusoy Bozbuğa N, Kırali K, Eren E, Erdem
Toker M, Keleş C, et al. Karotis arter stenozunda cerrahi
tedavi ilkeleri: Koşuyolu deneyimi. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi
2001;10:111-9.
18 Alp BN, Bozbuğa N, Yakut C. Effect of carotid endarterectomy
on chronic ocular ischemic syndrome in bilateral carotid
artery disease complicated with transient ischemic attacks.
J Clin Res 2009;12:1-7.
19) Ziya Apaydın A. Antegrade cerebral perfusion: A review of
its current application. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2021;29:1-4.
20) Vasconcelos PR, Guimarães AB, Campelo MW, Vasconcelos
PR, Guimaraes SB. Preconditioning with L-alanyl-glutamine
upon cerebral edema and hypocampus red neurons counting
in rats subjected to brain ischemia/reperfusion injury. Acta
Cir Bras 2015;30:199-203.
21) Prieto-Arribas R, Moreno-Gutiérrez A, Simal-Hernández
P, Pascual-Garvi JM, Matías-Guiu J, Roda JM, et al.
Experimental models of cerebral ischemia. Rev Neurol
2008;47:414-26.
22 Ugurlucan M, Erer D, Karatepe O, Ziyade S, Haholu A,
Gungor Ugurlucan F, et al. Glutamine enhances the heat
shock protein 70 expression as a cardioprotective mechanism
in left heart tissues in the presence of diabetes mellitus.
Expert Opin Ther Targets 2010;14:1143-56.