Two months after surgery, the patient developed recurrent fever and bacteremia (Klebsiella pneumoniae). Echocardiography revealed an 80 to 80-mm paraventricular formation adjacent to the right ventricle without any detectable flow (Figure 1b). Positron emission tomography-computed tomography confirmed the presence of a cardiac abscess at the former RCA aneurysm site (Figure 1c, d). Surgical treatment of the abscess was planned to prevent septic spread. Access to the abscess required sacrificing the medial part of the affected venous bypass graft to the posterior descending artery. The abscess was exposed, completely removed, and thoroughly irrigated. The resulting cavity was once again reconstructed using a bovine pericardial patch. To restore myocardial perfusion of the right ventricle, a newly harvested venous graft was used to bridge the broken venous bypass graft between its proximal and distal parts. A triple antibiotic strategy, based on the current guidelines for endocarditis treatment,[1] was administered and adjusted according to the antibiogram to treat the infection. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was discharged in good general condition on postoperative Day 8.
Aneurysmal malformations of coronary arteries are rare and mostly coincidental findings in coronary angiography or tomography.[2] The RCA is commonly affected without any traceable predictors.[3] Due to the risk of thrombosis within the aneurysm and concomitant CAD, interventional or surgical removal of the aneurysm is performed.[3,4] In particular, complications, such as cardiac abscesses, are challenging due to the lack of standardized therapeutic approaches with sufficient evidence. However, after aneurysm excision, the resulting cavity may serve as a predisposed area for fluid accumulation as bacterial reservoir and subsequent development of a cardiac abscess. Aggressive antibiotic strategies are necessary, since abscesses can be encapsulated and exposed to poor perfusion. Considering the risk of bacterial mediastinitis or rapid development of a septic spread, and acknowledging the limited evidence on the treatment of this pathology, we strongly recommend surgical removal and debridement of the abscess, along with appropriate antibiotic therapy in accordance with endocarditis treatment.
Patient Consent for Publication: A written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Data Sharing Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author Contributions: Idea/concept: M.G., J.B.; Design: M.G.; Control/supervision: J.B.; Data collection and/ or processing: M.G.; Analysis and/or interpretation: M.G., J.B.; Literature review: M.G.; Writing the article: M.G., J.B.; Critical review: J.B.; References and fundings: M.G.; Materials: M.G.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG,
Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the
management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for
the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European
Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European
Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the
European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur
Heart J 2015;36:3075-128. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319.
2) Syed M, Lesch M. Coronary artery aneurysm: A review.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1997;40:77-84. doi: 10.1016/s0033-
0620(97)80024-2.