The authors stated that the huge amount of foreign material with the potential for untoward reactions, infection, extra weight on the sternum, and the difficulty of going back for cardiac or mediastinal surgical procedures in the future are the main drawbacks and hazards of secondary reconstruction. We believe that their opinions are correct. However, as reported in the literature, if primary closure is not possible due to a wide sternal gap, secondary maneuvers, including autologous grafting or reconstruction materials, should be considered.[3,4] Furthermore, the usage of metallic plates is favored in patients with an insufficient sternal bone.[5] Our patient had an isolated complete sternal with a defect size of about 6 cm (too wide for an infant), and thus, we preferred secondary reconstruction in our case. The patient was carefully monitored during the surgery, which demonstrated no cardiac compression signs, and control echocardiography at the first year was normal.
Data Sharing Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflict of Interest: The author declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Özyurtkan MO, Yüksel M, Kutlu N, Demiroluk İŞ, Şimşek
B. Repair of a complete sternal cleft in a five-month-old
female infant. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2024;32:232-235. doi:10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.23833.
2) Jabbad H, Shehata R, Al-Ebrahim K. Successful surgical
repair of complete sternal cleft in an adult. Asian Cardiovasc
Thorac Ann 2010;18:376-8. doi: 10.1177/0218492310376015.
3) Hinchcliff KM, Xue Y, Wong GB. Reconstruction of
Congenital Sternal Cleft: A Systematic Review of the
Literature. Ann Plast Surg 2021;86(5S Suppl 3):S418-S421.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002724.