Methods: Between June 1993 and July 1998, 40 patients (31 male / 9 female, mean age 41 ± 10 years) underwent LDDC. Twenty-nine patients (73%) were in NYHA class III and 11 patients were in class IV (27%), etiology was idiopathic in 26 patients (65%) and ischemic in 14 (35%). The average left ventricle endsystolic volume (LVESV) was 146 ± 36 ml (108-245 ml), enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) was 220 ± 39 ml (150-318 ml), and ejection fraction (LVEF) was 23% ± 7% (10% - 33%).
Results: Ten patients were lost during follow-up. Survival at 5 ± 2.5 years was 50% ± 9% and surviving patients were in class II as of their last follow-ups (p < 0.0001). The average LVEF was 32% ± 10% (18% - 53%; p = 0.0004), LVEDV was 235 ± 100 ml (90-513 ml; p > 0.05), and LVESV was 157 ± 83 ml (44-363 ml; p > 0.05) at the last follow-up. Although postoperative LVEF at each period was higher than the preoperative value, there were no statistical differences in LVESV and LVEDV between the follow-up periods. The factors having untoward effects on long-term survival were preoperative class IV symptomatology (p = 0.001), LVEF < 20% (p = 0.001), LVESD > 60 mm (p = 0.02) and ischemic etiology (p = 0.04). Patients having LVESV > 150 ml, LVEDV > 290 ml and LVEF < 35% at their last follow-up were under risk of demise during follow-up.
Conclusions: The long-term results of LDDC were satisfactory in regard to survival and functional capacity. However, these correlated poorly by echocardiographic findings. To achieve optimal results, patient selection is of pivotal importance.