Transcatheter recanalization of a stenotic systemic to pulmonary artery shunt provides an effective means to restore or increase the pulmonary blood flow. Percutanous approach for acutely obstructed mBT shunt is increasingly being used by number of clinics. MacMillan et al.[1] and Sivakumar et al.[2] have reported the successful balloon dilatation of an obstructed BT shunt in five cases. Wang et al.[3] have also reported the successful balloon dilatation in 46 cases in whom acute shunt failure was diagnosed postoperatively.
Marks et al.[4] and Marx et al.[5] demonstrated a series of m-BT shunt dilatations with suboptimal or optimal results, and clear success obtained in their patients. In 1994, Ries et al.[6] reported thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in m-BT shunt in a 10-day-old infant, four days after surgery for complete shunt thrombosis.
Balloon dilatation along with thrombolysis of an occluded shunt results in mechanical thrombus disruption and an increase in the surface area of thrombus susceptible to pharmacological thrombolysis, thus increasing the efficacy of the thrombolytics administered as an infusion over the next 48-72 hours.[6] There is always an issue as to how early the thrombolysis can be administered in case of occlusion of m-BT shunt immediately after surgery. According to the standard guidelines, thrombolytic agents can be administered safely after 10 days of any surgical procedure.[7]
The management of thrombosed systemic to pulmonary artery shunts with balloon dilatation and thrombolysis is preferred, as it avoids a repeat surgical procedure with its inherent morbidity and mortality. Complications associated with thrombolytic therapy for thrombosed BT shunts in early postoperative period include serious bleeding requiring transfusion and also possibility of excessive bleeding during reoperation if thrombolytic therapy fails.
In our case, following administration of t-PA infusion for 24 hours, the thrombus was significantly reduced which was confirmed on echocardiography. As the flow observed in m-BT subsequent to balloon angioplasty and thrombolysis was satisfactory, stent deployment was not considered in our case. In addition, stent implantation is accepted as an attractive alternative therapy for prevent mBT shunt stenosis or occlusion by many authors, particularly in the immediate postoperative period when fibrinolytic therapy may be hazardous. Indeed, many reports of stent placement have been reported in thrombosed m-BT shunt for restoration of patency. Lee et al.[8] reported a series of 13 cases who underwent successful stent implantation for restoration of aortopulmonary shunt.
It was concluded that transcatheter recanalisation (with or without the use of stent placement) of an acutely thrombosed mBT shunt is an attractive alternative to redo surgery. We believe that thrombolysis and/or stent deployment can be decided and carefully performed with adequately sized balloons.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect
to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.