Figure 1: Pulmonary computed tomography showing massive bilateral pulmonary embolism.
In our patient, we detected an entrapped thrombus at the PFO, most probably due to DVT, but without systemic embolization. Doppler examination revealed a thrombosis of the deep veins of the right leg. In such cases, Duplex scanning of abdominal and deep veins of the legs is also recommended, particularly to examine the possibility of placing an inferior vena cava filter or clip. It is prudent to perform pulmonary CT angiography as a first-line approach to assess for the presence of PE.
Treatment of PE with an entrapped thrombus in PFO is controversial. Anticoagulation, thrombolytic therapy or surgical intervention are the treatment options; however, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment of this clinical situation. Thrombolytic therapy is simple, rapid, available, although hemorrhage or dislodgement of the fixed thrombus may occur, resulting in increased mortality. In our case, we used the surgical option, despite the risk of cardiac surgery, as she had cardiac failure. This therapeutic choice seemed to be more rapid and complete than the other options, as PFO would be closed at the same time.[6] In a recent review, surgical thromboembolectomy yielded improved survival rates and reduced ischemic stroke, compared to anticoagulation therapy. On the other hand, the mortality rate remains high (27 to 41%) after the surgical procedure. There was no embolization reported after the surgical thrombus removal. Several studies reported that almost 65% of such patients underwent surgery, and the mortality rate was 9.7% vs 36% and 32% mortality in patients who underwent thrombolysis or anticoagulation therapy.[7,8]
In addition, the VA-ECMO device was used in our case to support the right ventricle and improve oxygen saturation. There are two types of ECMO: VA-ECMO and veno-venous (VV) ECMO.[9] While both provide respiratory support, VA-ECMO additionally improves the hemodynamic condition. As our patient remained hypotensive, despite maximal inotropic therapy, and hypoxemia persisted, despite 100% fraction of inspired oxygen, we used VA-ECMO device. Using the ECMO device in combination with surgical embolectomy in the management of massive PE was firstly described in 1961.[10] Over the years, ECMO therapy has been increasingly used with good results for patients who do not respond to the standard treatment or as a bridge to surgery. In selected patients, ECMO therapy may be a reasonable to ensure hemodynamic stabilization.
In conclusion, on the basis of our experience and review of the reported cases of entrapped thrombus in patent foramen ovale associated with pulmonary embolism, we conclude that surgery seems to have the most optimal results among the therapeutic options for these patients.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to
the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.