Fehmi Bors1, Hatice Büyükkol2, Nihat Şencan3, Hüseyin Gümüş4, Eşe C. Çaran Karaoğlu5, Mücella Kaçar6, Sedef Dündar7
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Perfusion, İzmir Egepol Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye
2Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Perfusion, Konya Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye
3Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Perfusion, Lefkoşa Dr. Burhan Nalbantoğlu State Hospital, Nicosia, North Cyprus
4Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Perfusion, Uşak Training and Research Hospital, Uşak, Türkiye
5Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Perfusion, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye
6Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Perfusion, University of Health Sciences, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye
7Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Perfusion, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
Since the first successful use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), much
has changed in its technology, area of use, and management. Despite
suggestions in guidelines, the institutional behavior may change based
on institutional experience and established habits. This so-called
"deviation" may alter management strategies in favorable or unfavorable
ways. As the official Cardiopulmonary Bypass Study Group of the
Association of Perfusionists in Türkiye, we aimed to document the
current state of CPB management in Türkiye and make suggestions
based on current guidelines. A 20-item questionnaire e-mailed to
682 perfusionists in 110 centers in Türkiye, and 177 (25.95%) responses
were recorded from 97 centers. The questionnaire included main
parameters regarding the management of CPB. We believe that by
documenting the current state of CPB management strategies in Türkiye,
suboptimal management strategies can be improved and suggestions for
more favorable outcomes can be made.