Methods: A total of 15 pediatric patients (9 boys, 6 girls; mean age 34 months; range 8 days to 10 years) who underwent color Doppler echocardiography (CDE) and MSCT angiography for coarctation in our clinic between February 2009 and June 2010 were included in this study. The thorax was scanned from the cupula to the top of the diaphragm by using 16-slice computed tomography.
Results: Upon axial imaging, anatomical findings related with coarctation were not apparent in two patients (86.6%; n=2). The three-dimensional images clearly showed all of the areas of coarctation (100%; n=15). The overall sensitivity of MSCT diagnosis for coarctation was 100%, which was higher than CDE (86.6%; n=13). The diagnosis for each patient was confirmed with surgery.
Conclusion: The study proved the feasibility and efficiency of low-dose MSCT angiography as a noninvasive method to detect the native aortic coarctation in children.
Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography has recently been introduced as a noninvasive method in the detection and quantification of coarctation. This permits highspeed scanning and adequate image quality. The increased resolution of MSCT and image processing in three-dimensional analyses provide a major improvement in the image quality.[3,4] However, as a result of technical developments which have led to increased temporal resolution through faster gantry rotation and improved spatial resolution through thinner slice collimation, MSCT is associated with an increased radiation dose.[5] According to these findings, dose-saving algorithms are very important in reducing radiation exposure and should be used in every imaging modality, especially during childhood.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and utility of low-dose MSCT angiography as a noninvasive method for detecting anatomic structures and combined anomalies associated with CoA.
Multislice computed tomography angiography
technique
The thorax was scanned from the cupula to the top of
the diaphragm using 16-slice computed tomography
(Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany).
Children with the ability to hold their breath were
told to take a deep breath before the scanning
commenced. Small children were allowed to rest or
fall asleep. When required, sedation was achieved by
an oral dose of chloral hydrate (40-60 mg/kg) prior
to the exam. A non-ionic iodinated contrast material
(1.5 ml/kg) was injected by a power injector with
a rate of 1 ml/sec via antecubital vein. The bolus
tracking method was used.
Scan parameters (collimation 16x0.75 mm, pitch 1, gantry rotation time 0.5 sec, 100 kV) led to an estimated radiation exposure of between 2.5 and 5.2 mSv. This examination was systematically obtained by adjusting the mAs setting according to the patient's size and anatomic shape. According to this setting, the value of mAs ranged between 30 and 75. The scanning duration was 5-8 s (mean 6.6 s).
Multislice computed tomography data analysis
Acquired axial slices were evaluated, and non-vascular
thoracic organ abnormalities were noted. The image data
of the CT angiography was transferred to a computer
workstation (Wizard, Siemens, Germany). Then axial
slices were reconstructed using Maximum Intensity
Projection (MIP) and Volume Rendering Technique
(VRT). Images were reconstructed with a 0.75 mm
slice thickness and 0.4 mm reconstruction intervals.
These reconstructed axial images were processed
and evaluated with the consensus of two experienced
pediatric radiologists. On the three-dimensional page,
the reconstructed images were evaluated in the axial,
sagittal, and coronal planes. The course, morphology,
and sizes, especially of the aorta and its main branches,
were examined. In patients with CoA, the region of the
stenotic segment, length, collaterals, and accompanying
anomalies were noted.
Table 1: The findings of echocardiography, 3D images and surgery in patients with coarctation
Multislice computed tomography has several advantages versus conventional angiography, especially for children. Commonly, there is no need for sedation and general anesthesia. It has been successfully applied to children four years old and above because they can easily adjust to the instructions. Low doses of sedatives can be used for smaller or agitated children. In uncooperative cases, scanning is performed during a few seconds of calm (5-7 sec). The short scanning time reduces motion artifacts, and image quality is not affected at all. Because of the fast scanning, MSCT is preferable when there is a severe illness or life-threatening situation. Also, it presents minimal invasive mortality and morbidity risks.[8,9] Contrary to conventional angiography, potential interventional complications (dissection, occlusion, bleeding, etc.) are absent. It is easily applied in the case of bleeding diathesis. Conventional angiography has the disadvantage of taking a long time, being invasive, and requiring anesthesia in the pediatric population. However, unlike angiography, additional information, such as pressure curves and oxygen saturation data, cannot be derived from an MSCT examination.
Previous studies have described the role of axial and three-dimensional renderings in the diagnosis of mediastinal vascular anomalies.[3,4] Recently, a study associated with CT angiography and three-dimensional reconstruction in young children with CoA showed the diagnostic sensitivities of CoA as being 87.5% for axial and 100% for three-dimensional, volume-rendered images.[3] In another study, the results were consistent with the former study.[4] Previous and present studies demonstrate that MSCT angiography is a noninvasive, feasible technique for assessing CoA.
Radiation exposure is important in the pediatric population because children are considered to be more sensitive to ionizing radiation than adults, and they have a longer life expectancy. The main disadvantage of MSCT is radiation exposure. Computed tomography protocols are associated with a known increase in the risk of future malignancy.[9,10] According to these findings, dose-saving algorithms are very important in reducing radiation exposure and should be used in every imaging modality, especially during childhood. These algorithms include shorter scan volumes, lower tube currents, increased table speed or pitch, and increased speed of gantry rotation.[11-13] As with all pediatric CT, mAs must be adjusted for patient size. For gated evaluation, in general, three-four different tube current categories may be more practical, ranging from about one-third of the adult mAs for the smallest child to the adult mAs for adult-sized children.[4,14] In this current study, we used the lowest parameter of 30 mAs and 100 kVp to provide optimal quality images without any significant loss of diagnostic data.
The small number of patients and lack of X-ray angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the accuracy of the MSCT data are the major limitations of the present study; however, increasing the sample size in the future is being planned. Because of the radiation burden, we were not able to compare this technique with conventional angiography. MRI provides not only the advantage of imaging without radiation, but functional assessment as well. In particular, flow measurements are of interest to identify relevant collateral circulation.[15] However, in this technique, the scanning time is longer than in MSCT which may require prolonged sedation and may be difficult to perform in seriously ill children.
In conclusion, this study proved the feasibility and efficiency of low dose MSCT angiography as a noninvasive method in detecting anatomic structures of CoA and combined anomalies without any significant loss of diagnostic data. MSCT with three-dimensional reconstruction displayed the vascular structures clearly; therefore, it can be used in place of conventional angiography in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with CoA.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect
to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Beekman RH. Coarctation of the aorta. In: Allen HD,
Gutgesell HP, Clark EB, Driscoll DJ editors. Moss and
Adams' heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents.
6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
p. 988-1010.
2) Rao PS. Coarctation of the aorta. Curr Cardiol Rep
2005;7:425-34.
3) Hu XH, Huang GY, Pa M, Li X, Wu L, Liu F, et al.
Multidetector CT angiography and 3D reconstruction in
young children with coarctation of the aorta. Pediatr Cardiol
2008;29:726-31.
4) Lee EY, Siegel MJ, Hildebolt CF, Gutierrez FR, Bhalla S,
Fallah JH. MDCT evaluation of thoracic aortic anomalies
in pediatric patients and young adults: comparison of
axial, multiplanar, and 3D images. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2004;182:777-84.
5) Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M,
Martinoff S, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac
multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact
of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.
Circulation 2006;113:1305-10.
6) Gilkeson RC, Ciancibello L, Zahka K. Pictorial essay.
Multidetector CT evaluation of congenital heart disease
in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2003;180:973-80.
7) Shih MC, Tholpady A, Kramer CM, Sydnor MK, Hagspiel
KD. Surgical and endovascular repair of aortic coarctation:
normal findings and appearance of complications on CT
angiography and MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2006;187:W302-12.
8) Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Yun TJ, et
al. CT of congenital heart disease: normal anatomy and
typical pathologic conditions. Radiographics 2003;23 Spec
No:S147-65.
9) Pappas JN, Donnelly LF, Frush DP. Reduced frequency of
sedation of young children with multisection helical CT.
Radiology 2000;215:897-9.
10) Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake
MA, Shepard JA, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose
optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619-28.
11) O\'Daniel JC, Stevens DM, Cody DD. Reducing radiation
exposure from survey CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2005;185:509-15.
12) Adaletli I, Kurugoglu S, Ulus S, Ozer H, Elicevik M,
Kantarci F, et al. Utilization of low-dose multidetector CT
and virtual bronchoscopy in children with suspected foreign
body aspiration. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:33-40.
13) Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP, Yoshizumi T, Varchena
V, Poe SA, et al. In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric
CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using
experimental and clinical data. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2003;180:407-11.