Methods: In this randomized-controlled, single-blind study, randomization was done based on three variables: age, gender, and education status. In total, 60 patients were included and were randomly divided into control and intervention groups as 30 patients in each group. Discharge program was applied to the intervention group. The patients were evaluated with home visits.
Results: Almost all of the intervention group patients had normal physical examination findings such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, body temperature, bowel sounds, edema, use of triflow and lung sounds, and they experienced no complications such as persistent pain, despite resting and sublingual pills, palpitation with shortness of breath, persistent shortness of breath despite resting, increased body weight of more than 1 to 1.5 kg per day, body temperature more than 38.0 °C and inflammatory flow, flushing and swell in incision area. Unintended return back to the hospital in the intervention group was prevented in 54 of 59 patients and was requested for five patients. In the control group, 22 patients returned back to the hospital for the first time and five for the second time.
Conclusion: Our study results demonstrate that planned discharge program applied on patients with coronary artery bypass grafting is effective in the management of postoperative care and preventing complications and unintended returns back to the hospital.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is currently the most commonly used open surgery method for the surgical treatment of heart diseases.[3] The problems emerge after the discharge period for patients having CABG and for their relatives. Discharged patients may experience some problems at home such as opening of stitches, pain, immobility, constipation, irregular nutrition, stress, and maladjustment. These problems usually appear within the first six weeks following surgery.[3,4] After discharge, all possible problems cause stress for both patients and their families. Most patients and their families need help for solutions of the problems at home.[5,6] Discharge planning and healthcare at home are the main components of care sustainability and health improvement services. Discharge training is one of the important parts of discharge planning. Discharge training is an important step to determine patients care needs at home, to increase the quality of patient care, and to provide the sustainability of care. Apart from discharge training, phone consulting is one of the most common nursery approaches to ease the healing at home following surgery.[7-12]
Previous studies have shown that discharge training, nursery care, and home-based care have improved the patients quality of life, by improving his mental and physical health and adaptive response to home and treatment.[13,14] Moreover, these interventions result in the engagement of the patient and his family to the treatment process, thereby, increasing the use of health services after discharge with increased patients satisfaction. It is well-known that patients having training and consulting have easier transition from hospital to home with reduced care and treatment costs.[15,16]
A nurse should do planning by informing and involving patient, his family, and team members after collecting necessary data. The quality of nursery care and the ability of patients self-care after discharge reflect the surgery success and it has an important role in preventing complications.[6,17-19]
This study is done to search about the influence of discharge program (discharge training, phone consulting, home visit) on complications and return to hospital of patients having CABG.
In the study sampling, randomization was done based on three variables: age, gender, and education status (Table 1). According to this randomization, 30 patients were assigned for control and study groups, in total 60 patients (Figure 1). Six patients were excluded from study for each control and study groups. The study was completed with 48 patients (Figure 1). The patients were not informed about their assigned group. The effect size was found power to be 100%, depending on type 1 error 0.05. Study sampling was completed between January and August 2011. Data were collected by the researcher with Patient Details Form, Form for Risk Factors Related with Coronary Artery Disease and Surgery/Hospital Life of the Patients, Monitorization Form of Consulting with Phone, Form for Characteristics Related with Unintended Application to Hospital, and Control Form of Home Visit.
Table 1: Demographic characteristics
Figure 1: Anticipated participant flow through study.
Inclusion criteria: P atients w ho d ecided t o underwent CABG at the hospital where research took place, signed the informed consent form, were communicable, were educated enough to read and write in Turkish, and had two or less chronic diseases were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria: Patients with walking disability preventing exercising and patients who developed complications during the hospitalization period were excluded from the study.
An ethical approval was obtained from Acibadem University Medical Studies Ethics Commission (2010/73) and hospital management before starting the study. A written and oral consent was obtained from each patient. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
After taking permission from the intervention group, the data were collected based on the procedure. Later planned discharge program was applied. Discharge training was composed of three steps. These were planned discharge training at the hospital, phone consulting, and home visit (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Data collection procedures.
It was planned with cooperation of patient and his family starting from the day entering the hospital till the discharge day for two to three times daily. Trainings were given the at patients room for 15 min by following diagnostics, planning, application, and evaluation processes. The booklet named as Life and Precautions at Home After CABG, prepared with the help of specialists views, was given to patient and his family at the start of the training. This booklet includes information about the hospital processes of patients having CABG, things should be done and not to be done during care at hospital and home, nutrition, exercise, emergency cases, the cases when to call nurse. Trainings which were given to patient and his family by nurse were recorded to the Patient Training Form including the information about the training subject, date and time.
All patients were requested to call the researcher, when they needed to obtain information during the hospital stay or after discharge, and when they experienced anxiety or emergency cases.
The researcher listened to the patients concern, applied necessary nursery attempt, directed patient to appropriate person and institution and took feedback from patient about his last condition by calling. After each call, the details were recorded to the Phone Consulting Follow-Up Form. The patients pain was assessed with Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS). The business card which includes researchers contact details was given to patient and his family to facilitate the communication.
Home visit was done after 25 to 30 days of discharge with the availability of both patient and researcher. The Home Visit Control Form was used during home visit. During home visit, it was checked whether the patient and his family applied the trainings given at the hospital, if not, then the reasons were questioned, and necessary nursery care was applied and physical examination was performed.
The patients with normal physical health results who applied the given trainings were supported by the researcher. Caregivers were appreciated and encouraged. For the patients who did not apply trainings and suggestions or whose physical health results were abnormal were identified. Then, the reasons were questioned and nursery attempts were applied in the frame of nursery procedures. In case of any complications or emergency cases, other institutions or specialists (doctor, CVS responsible nurse, dietician, pharmacist, physiotherapist and psychologist) were called and cooperated.
Data were collected based on the data collection procedure after taking permission from patients in the control group (Figure 2). Planned discharge program was not applied to this group. All patients in the control group received the standard care. Home visit was done after 25 to 30 days of discharge with the availability of both patient and researcher to check the patients condition. The Home Visit Control Form was used to question the patients practice, and physical examination was performed.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS
version 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
The exact chi-square test and McNemars test were
used. P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
Descriptive data were expressed in number and
percentage and in mean and standard deviation (SD).
Table 2: Clinical characteristics
All patients were questioned about proper or improper applications during home visits. Most of the patients in the intervention group did right applications properly with planned discharge training regarding breathing exercises, varicose vein sock usage, quitting smoking, excretion, bath and wound care, nutritional choices, exercise, resting and free time usage, sexual life, coping with stress, adapting to home and attending to control visit, whereas most of the patients in control group did improper applications (p<0.001). Based on the physical examination results during home visits (Table 3), it was observed that most of patients in the intervention group had normal systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse, body temperature, bowel sounds, edema, wound place at sternum, triflow usage, and lung sounds, whereas the patients in the control group had abnormal physical examination findings (p<0.001). In addition, the patients in the intervention group had improved BMI values, whereas the patients in the control group had reduced BMI values. According to the complications following surgery (Table 4), almost all patients except one in the intervention group had no complications such as pain, despite sublingual medication use, tachycardia together with dyspnea, dyspnea despite having rest, more than 1 to 1.5 kg weight gain daily, body temperature above 38 °C, weeping at the incision region, whereas most of the patients in the control group had these complications (p<0.001).
Table 3: Physical examination findings
Table 4: Emergency cases and complications
In addition, the patients in the intervention with applied phone consulting called the researcher about problems such as mostly pain, edema, breath problems, fear, stress, sleep disorder, constipation, control appointment, protection of sternum, bathing and wound care, and emergency cases. The patients who called due to pain had a mean pain score of 7±1.0 before the intervention, according to the Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS) and it decreased to 2.8±1.1 after the intervention. The researcher was called for 59 times by the patients in the intervention group. During phone call depending on the patient and his familys complaint, nursery intervention was done and multidisciplinary cooperation was conducted. After the intervention, the results were taken and recorded.
A total of 49 patients that had phone consulting reported that their complaints resolved. Other five patients reported that they had less complaints and five patients were requested to return to the hospital. The patients mostly called the researcher intensively during the first and sixth weeks. The nurse prevented the return of 54 patients of 59 by phone consulting the patient and his family. When unintended return of the patients in the control group to hospital was observed, 22 returns were made and the patients stayed with the mean of 1.9±1.4 days at hospital. Three patients in the intervention group made unintended return to the hospital and stayed a mean of 1.5 days (Table 5).
Table 5: Unintended return to hospital and its reasons distribution
Previous studies also demonstrated that discharge training after surgery affected patients positively regarding adaptive response to diet, increase in physical activity, weight gain control, regular exercising, and regular bowel movement.[6,16,27-29] Similarly, in this study, we found that the patients in the intervention group applied the training rules regarding, nutrition choice after surgery, not having constipation, and exercise; however, the control group did not. In particular, 70.8% of patients in intervention group have not done any exercise ever, after surgery 91.7% of the patients in the intervention group started to do exercise regularly. A total of 66.7% of the patients in the control group had not done exercise ever, which increased to 79.2% after surgery (p<0.001). In addition, the intervention group had imposed BMI values, whereas the values worsened in the control group.
Nutrition and exercise are critical for the patients health after CABG. Balanced and efficient nutrition result in normal values of blood pressure, blood fatty acid levels, wound healing, normal BMI values, and bowel sounds for patients after surgery. Furthermore, regular exercise increases basal metabolism, decreases myocardial oxygen need for daily activities, and causes psychosocial healing.[24,25] Exercise has been also suggested as an important treatment step in preventing sudden cardiac death.[24,25,30,31] Based on our study results, trainings given in nutrition, exercise, resting, and wound healing decreased the complication risk in the patients in the intervention group, supporting the H1 hypothesis.
Furthermore, correct use of varicose veins sock regulates blood circulation and decreases edema in legs and thromboembolism development risk.[27,32-34] In this study, the intervention group had no edema in legs due to trainings given about varicose vein sock use, whereas the control group had such problems p<0.001). Strikingly, edema development in legs results in thromboembolism, which may cause sudden death after surgery.[3,9] This implies that the patients in the control group may have complications, thereby, returning hospital and may have sudden death.
In the present study, discharge training and home visits were effective and the patients applied these trainings accordingly. These trainings were given prior to the surgery until discharge on daily basis and structured based on adult training specifications, involved both patient and his family in care, cooperated with health team, personalized trainings were given, patients motivation and physical situation were cared, and patient and his family were consulted by phone.[6,19,35-39]
Pain despite having sublingual pill, palpitation with dyspnea, dyspnea despite having rest, more than 1 to 1.5 kg weight gain daily, body temperature over 38 °C, and inflammation at the incision region were significantly lower in the intervention group, compared to the control group (p<0.001). This study also showed that combining discharge training with phone consulting eased adaptation of patients after surgery and due to proper selfcare complication development risk decreased. Complications were observed in the control group due to the lack of trainings; therefore, they returned hospital, supporting the H1 and H2 hypotheses. It is also known that these complications prolonged the healing process and constrained patient and his family financially. Moreover, apart from causing physical pain for the patient, complications resulted in necrophobia, being asocial, not be able to undertake responsibilities at home, thereby, affecting patients psychology adversely. When unintended return to the hospital was investigated, three patients in the intervention group and 22 patients in the control group returned to the hospital at the first attempt, while only five patients in the control group returned to the hospital at the second attempt.
The patients in the control group were admitted to hospital mostly due to chest pain, infection at incision region due to vein removal, breath problem, bleeding and infection at sternum incision region, and insomnia and stayed at hospital for a mean of 1.9 days. Nurses did phone consultation with the patients in the intervention group and the patients were invited to the hospital, if needed. After intervention, five patients were requested to return to the hospital. Responding and consulting to 54 calls resulted in decrease of patients complains and relieved them. Therefore, unintended return to hospital was less among the patients in the intervention group, supporting the H2 hypothesis. Unintended return to the hospital and complication development caused increase in the costs regarding medicine use and bed occupation.[18,22] In this study, planned discharge program applied to the patient and his family reduced the complication development and unintended return to the hospital; therefore, the costs could be reduced. Thus, discharge training together with phone consultation and home visits decreased the complications thanks to the care control after surgery, multidisciplinary cooperation, early intervention, motivating patient and his family, facilitating patient adaptation to home, and personalized care at home, thereby, preventing unintended returns to the hospital.
In conclusion, planned discharge program which was composed of discharge training, phone consultation, and home visits provided patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting the following benefits in the postoperative period:
Proper breathing, quitting smoking, regular
exercising, adaptation to diet, proper usage of
varicose vein sock, effective bathing and wound
care, easy adaptation to home
Normalized physical examination results
Decreased complications due to proper
management of self-care
Reduced unintended return to hospital
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to
the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
This study is funded by Erciyes University Scientific
Research Projects Unit (BAP) through a Project (TSD-10-
3276).
1) Taghipour HR, Naseri MH, Safiarian R, Dadjoo Y, Pishgoo
B, Mohebbi HA, et al. Quality of life one year after coronary
artery bypass graft surgery. Iran Red Crescent Med J
2011;13:171-7.
2) Nichols M, Townsend N, Luengo-Fernandez. R, Leal J, Gray
A, Scarborough P, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease
Statistics 2012;14-45.
3) Hinkle JL, Cheever KH, editors. Brunner & Suddarths
Textbook of Medical Surgical Nursing. 13th ed. Phileadelphia:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
4) Badır A, Demir Korkmaz F. Koroner arter hastalıkları. In:
Karadakovan A, Eti Aslan F, editörler. Dahili ve Cerrahi
Hastalıklarda Bakım. Adana: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2011.
s. 473-507.
5) Yılmaz M, Çifçi ES. A model defining the needs of patient
care at home after open heart surgery: functional health
patterns. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2010;18:183-9.
6) Sheridan SL, Viera AJ, Krantz MJ, Ice CL, Steinman LE,
Peters KE, et al. The effect of giving global coronary risk
information to adults: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med
2010;170:230-9.
7) Helmark C, Ingwersen G, Johansen K, Hansen TB.
Cardiovascular nurses attitudes to and experiences with
guidelines and nursing research. European Journal of
Cardiovascular Nursing 2015;14:66-7.
8) Ertem A, Yava A, Demirkılıç U. Kardiyak cerrahi yapılan
hastaların ameliyat öncesi verilen aydınlatılmış onam
hakkındaki görüş ve önerilerinin belirlenmesi. Turk Gogus
Kalp Dama 2013;21:378-91.
9) Potter AP, Perry AG, Stockert P, Hall A. Fundamentals of
Nursing. 8th ed: St. Louis Mosby Comp 2013.
10) Barnason S, Zimmerman L, Nieveen J, Schulz P, Miller C,
Hertzog M, et al. Relationships between fatigue and early
postoperative recovery outcomes over time in elderly patients
undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung 2008;37:245-56.
11) Pethybridge J. How team working influences discharge
planning from hospital: a study of four multi-disciplinary
teams in an acute hospital in England. J Interprof Care
2004;18:29-41.
12) French DP, Cooper A, Weinman J. Illness perceptions
predict attendance at cardiac rehabilitation following acute
myocardial infarction: a systematic review with metaanalysis.
J Psychosom Res 2006;61:757-67.
13) Harbman P. The development and testing of a nurse
practitioner secondary prevention intervention for patients
after acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study.
Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:1542-56.
14) Demir N. Preoperatif hazırlık-postoperatif bakım ve takip.
In: Sabuncu N, Akça Ay F, editörler. Klinik Beceriler,
Sağlığın Değerlendirilmesi Hasta Bakımı ve Takibi. Nobel
Tıp Kitabevleri İstanbul; 2010. s. 626-49.
15) Preen DB, Bailey BE, Wright A, Kendall P, Phillips
M, Hung J, et al. Effects of a multidisciplinary, postdischarge
continuance of care intervention on quality of
life, discharge satisfaction, and hospital length of stay:
a randomized controlled trial. Int J Qual Health Care
2005;17:43-51.
16) Treat-Jacobson DJ, Lindquist R. Exercise, quality of life, and
symptoms in men and women five to six years after coronary
artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung 2007;36:387-97.
17) Treat-Jacobson DJ, Lindquist R. Exercise, quality of life, and
symptoms in men and women five to six years after coronary
artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung 2007;36:387-97.
18) Lawson KD, Fenwick EA, Pell AC, Pell JP. Comparison of
mass and targeted screening strategies for cardiovascular
risk: simulation of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and
coverage using a cross-sectional survey of 3921 people. Heart
2010;96:208-12.
19) Collier EJ, Harrington C. Discharge planning, nursing home
placement, and the Internet. Nurs Outlook 2005;53:95-103.
20) Hacıalioğlu N, Özer N. The problems and needs of caregıvers
after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a literature
review. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi
2008;11:112-22.
21) Zimmerman L, Barnason S, Hertzog M, Young L, Nieveen
J, Schulz P, et al. Gender differences in recovery outcomes
after an early recovery symptom management intervention.
Heart Lung 2011;40:429-39.
22) Mochari-Greenberger H, Mosca M, Aggarwal B, Umann
TM, Mosca L. Caregiver status: a simple marker to identify
cardiac surgery patients at risk for longer postoperative
length of stay, rehospitalization, or death. J Cardiovasc Nurs
2014;29:12-9.
23) Kunt AS, Darcin OT, Andac MH. Coronary artery bypass
surgery in high-risk patients. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc
Med 2005;6:13.
24) Kurçer MA, Özbay A. Koroner arter hastalarında uygulanan
yaşam tarzı eğitim ve danışmanlığının yaşam kalitesine
etkisi Anatol J Cardiol 2011;11:107-13.
25) Cebeci F, Celik SS. Discharge training and counselling
increase self-care ability and reduce postdischarge problems
in CABG patients. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:412-20.
26) Hogan M, Dentlinger N, Ramdin V. Kalp hastalıkları.
In: Çelik S, Yeşilbalkan UÖ, editörler. Dahili ve Cerrahi
Hastalıklar Hemşireliği. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2015.
s. 83-120.
27) Özdemir L. Koroner yoğun bakımda kalan hastaların
deneyimlerinin belirlenmesi. Hemşirelikte Araştırma
Geliştirme Dergisi 2010;1:10-2.
28) Crane PB. Fatigue and physical activity in older women after
myocardial infarction. Heart Lung 2005;34:30-8.
29) Huang TT, Liang SH. A randomized clinical trial of
the effectiveness of a discharge planning intervention in
hospitalized elders with hip fracture due to falling. J Clin
Nurs 2005;14:1193-201.
30) Haseli-Mashhadi N, Pan A, Ye X, Wang J, Qi Q, Liu Y, et
al. Self-Rated Health in middle-aged and elderly Chinese:
distribution, determinants and associations with cardiometabolic
risk factors. BMC Public Health 2009;9:368.
31) Theobald K, McMurray A. Coronary artery bypass graft
surgery: discharge planning for successful recovery. J Adv
Nurs 2004;47:483-91.
32) Lee GA. Patient and spouse perceived quality of life five
years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Open Nurs
J 2008;2:63-7.
33) Elitoğ N, Erkuş B. CABG Operasyonu geçirmiş olan
hastaların taburculuk sonrası en sık yaşadıkları problemlerin tanımlanması. Türk Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derneği 10.
Ulusal Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 17-21 Ekim 2008 İzmir,
Türkiye; 2008. s. 95.
34) Thomson P, Niven CA, Peck DF, Howie K. Coronary
heart disease risk factors: concordance between patients
and partners before and after bypass grafting surgery. J
Cardiovasc Nurs 2013;28:550-62.
35) Middel B, El Baz N, Pedersen SS, van Dijk JP, Wynia K,
Reijneveld SA. Decline in health-related quality of life
6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the
influence of anxiety, depression, and personality traits.
J Cardiovasc Nurs 2014;29:544-54.
36) Ishii K, Koizumi M, Shimada M, Seino Y, Yamazaki K.
Efficacy of introduction of guidelines for patients aftre
cardiovascular surgery in intensive care unit. European
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2015;14:60-1.
37) Schulz PS, Zimmerman L, Pozehl B, Barnason S, Nieveen J.
Symptom management strategies used by elderly patients after
coronary artery bypass surgery. Appl Nurs Res 2011;24:65-73.
38) Hartford K. Telenursing and patients' recovery from bypass
surgery. J Adv Nurs 2005;50:459-68.