Özet

Methods: A total of 70 infants (38 boys, 32 girls; mean age of patients <1 month was 16.4±9.5 days [n=20; 28.6%]; 1-7.5 months was 126.3±47.8 [n=50; 71.4%]) who underwent ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization between October 2014 and October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All catheterizations were done under the guidance of ultrasound by two skilled anesthesiologists. Data including demographic characteristics of the patients, procedural success rate, catheter access time, number of attempts, and complications were recorded.

Results: The overall success rate of the procedure was 92.8% (n=65). In 82% of the patients (n=53), the insertion was successful at the first attempt. The mean catheter access time (time from the first puncture to the catheter insertion) was 214±0.48 sec. Complications were seen in five patients (7.14%), and the body weight of these patients was less than 2,500 g. There was no arterial puncture in any patients. One patient (1.42%) developed pneumothorax and four patients (5.7%) developed hematoma due to repeated attempts.

Conclusion: Our study results suggest that ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is a safe and effective technique in pediatric population weighing less than 5 kg undergoing congenital heart surgery.

In recent years, the use of US as a guide has been increasing to reduce the risks associated with central venous catheter insertion. Several publications have demonstrated its role as a complementary tool in pediatric patients by reducing the incidence of complications during the catheter insertion.[5,6] With the guidance of US, it is also possible to identify the size and location of the vessel and to evaluate the presence of congenital anomalies and anatomic variations.[1,4]

Various factors contribute to the success rate of CVC, including patient characteristics, comorbidities, and access site. The most common complications include bleeding, hematoma, arterial puncture, and pneumothorax.[5]

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of US-guided internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation in terms of the complication and success rates in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease.

Yöntem

After retrospective evaluation of the medical charts and nursing documentations, data including demographic characteristics of the infants such as age, gender, and body weight and existing comorbidities were recorded.

A single anesthetic regimen was used in all patients (for induction 5 mg/kg sodium thiopental, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium, and 2 µg/kg fentanyl). After orotracheal intubation, the patient was placed in the appropriate position for the cannulation to visualize the vein properly, and the area was washed and draped. The operator was positioned at the head of the bed.

For right IJV cannulation, the patient was positioned with a rolled towel under the shoulders with the head turned to the left. First, the right IJV was chosen for the primary insertion attempt. The right neck was wrapped using the standard sterile technique. The jugular venous anatomy was examined through a 7.5 MHz sonographic probe (Sonosite Titan, linear probe -7.5 MHz) (Figure 1). The compression of the vein with gentle pressure of a probe on the skin and the presence of the pulse in the carotid artery (CA) were confirmed.

Figure 1: Two-dimensional ultrasound image of right femoral vein. Right neck central vein cannulation. Out-of-plane (short axis) ultrasound image.

The linear probe was connected to a real-time twodimensional US device (SonoSite, Bothwell, WA, USA) and focused at 3.5 cm depth. The probe was covered with ultrasonic gel and wrapped in a sterile cover.

The real-time US is a technique of needle advancement and vessel puncture under the permanent US guidance (i.e., the needle is permanently seen on the US screen). The sonographic probe was placed perpendicular to the long axis of the vessel, visualizing the vein in the short-axis view as a circle (Figure 2). Under the sonographic guidance, the right IJV was punctured (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Needle insertion perpendicularly. (a) Out-of-plane (short axis). (b) Needle tip clearly seen in the internal jugular vein.

The success rate, access time, number of attempts, the incidence of complications during each attempt (i.e., CA puncture, hematoma, hemodynamic alteration, pneumothorax, and catheter-related complications such as kinking or threading difficulties) were recorded. The access time was defined as the time from the needle penetration of the skin and to the insertion of the catheter into the vein over the guidewire with the removal of the needle entering the skin.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS for Windows version 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive data were expressed in mean ± standard deviation (SD) and number and frequency (%). Student's t-test was used for comparison of quantitative variants. Qualitative variants were compared using chi-square tests or the Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between the parameters that conform to the normal distribution. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Bulgular

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of patients (n=70)

The success rate of the IJV catheter insertion was 92.8%. Only in five patients (7.14%), the procedure failed. In these patients, the catheter was inserted into the femoral vein. In total, 53 CVC (81.5%) were successful at the first attempt and nine (13.8%) at the second attempt, while three patients (4.6%) required ?3 punctures.

Complications were observed in five patients (7.14%) weighing less than 2,500 g. One of them had a giant teratoma which limited the neck movements of the patient with a body weight of 950 g. In these patients, femoral vein catheterization was done rather than the IJV puncture.

Pneumothorax occurred only in one patient (1.42%). Hematoma occurred in four patients (5.7%) due to the multiple IJV cannulation attempts. There was no CA puncture in any patients (Table 2).

Table 2: Outcome measures of ultrasound-guided catheterization (n=70)

The mean access time was 214±0.48 sec (Table 2). The weight was correlated with the catheter insertion time using the Pearson"s correlation coefficient. There was a statistically significant and negative correlation between total catheter insertion time and body weight of the patients (57.7%; p<0.05).

Tartışma

In a retrospective study including 149 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, Leyvi et al.[8] reported a success rate of 91.5% in the US group and 72.5% in the landmark group. In another study including 60 pediatric patients younger than 12 years old who underwent cardiac surgery, Dalvi et al.[9] found that the first attempt success was higher in the US group (73.3%) than the landmark group (36.6%). In the aforementioned study, the CA puncture was also higher in the landmark group (43.3%) than the US group (10%), and the mean number of attempts were higher in the landmark group than the US group (p=0.008). Similar findings were also reported by Verghese et al.[10] In our study, we retrospectively evaluated the success rate of US-guided CVC in lowweight pediatric patients undergoing congenital heart surgery. The overall success rate was 92.8% (n=65), requiring only one attempt in 81.5% of the patients (n=53). Only 12 patients (18.4%) needed multiple attempts for successful catheterization, and all of these patients requiring multiple attempts had lower weight, compared to the others. The complication rate was also low (7.1%, n=5). There was no CA puncture in any patients.

Furthermore, anatomic variations and vascular anomalies about the IJV and CA in children with congenital cardiac disease may compromise the catheterization. According to Troianos et al.,[11] there was a high incidence (54%) of posteriorly inserted CA which predisposed the patients to CA puncture, if the cannulation needle traversed the IJV. According to Alderson et al.'s study[12] where they examined the jugular venous anatomy by US in 50 patients younger than six years of age, there was an anomalous venous anatomy with an incidence of 18%. In 10% of the patients, CA was positioned posteriorly. The diameter of the IJV was also unusually small (?3 mm for neonates and infants, ≤5 mm for older children) in 4% of the patients. All of these anomalies increased the complication rate (20%) in the aforementioned study.

Visualization of the vessels and confirmation of anatomical variations regarding the IJV-CA relationship can be obtained by US-guided technique (Figure 1). The IJV is usually located laterally to the CA. With the US guidance, this anatomical relationship, arterial pulsation of the CA and the compression of the IJV can be seen easily.[13-16] Another important point of the visualization of the structures is that it is also possible to see the position of the guidewire and the catheter.[17]

In our clinic, we routinely perform IJV catheterization as the first choice, if there is no any contraindication. In this study, similar to previous studies, we were able to visualize the anatomical structures and IJV-CA relationship easily under the guidance of US. We believe that high procedural success rate in our study may be due to the advantage of using US. Similarly, Verghese et al.[18] and Grebenik et al.[19] achieved higher success rates in the US group. In many studies, it was reported that CVC with the US guidance reduced the access time and number of puncture attempts for successful catheterization.[18-21]

On the other hand, according to the study of Froehlich et al.,[3] there was no significant difference between the US guidance and landmark technique in terms of the time spent for catheterization; however, the authors reported that the time was also dependent on the experience of the practitioner. In our study, the mean access time from the first puncture to the catheter insertion was 214±0.48 sec and catheterization was performed by two anesthesiologists specialized in this area.

The age and weight of patients are also critical factors which affect the success rate and the number of attempts in catheter insertion. According to our study, there was a negative correlation between the weight of the patient and catheter insertion time and success rate (p<0.05). Froehlich et al.[3] demonstrated that success rate was lower in children with low-weight (median weight <16.25 kg) and multiple attempts were required for both techniques (US and landmark), compared to high-weight children (median weight >16.25 kg).

In our study, we found that, with the guidance of US, CVC could be performed with fewer complications and a higher success rate in a short period. Since children with congenital heart disease are exposed to multiple procedures and frequently require vascular access for diagnostic, interventional or medical reasons, CVC with the aid of US seems to be beneficial. Moreover, we believe that, in addition to the use of US guidance, optimal positioning, profound sedation, and the correct choice of the site and cannulation materials are the other important factors which affect the success rate.

The limitations of this study include retrospective design with small sample size and lack of a control group to compare the usual technique of anatomic landmarks. Nevertheless, our data can be generalized, as there are no missing data for any of the patients.

In conclusion, our study results suggest that the success rate of central catheterization under the guidance of ultrasound is high and ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is a safe and effective technique, particularly in the pediatric population weighing less than 5 kg undergoing congenital heart surgery.

Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Kaynaklar

1) Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327:361.

2) Al Sofyani K, Julia G, Abdulaziz B, Yves CJ, Sylvain R. Ultrasound guidance for central vascular access in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit. Saudi J Anaesth 2012;6:120-4.

3) Froehlich CD, Rigby MR, Rosenberg ES, Li R, Roerig PL, Easley KA, et al. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement decreases complications and decreases placement attempts compared with the landmark technique in patients in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1090-6

4) Legler D, Nugent M. Doppler localization of the internal jugular vein facilitates central venous cannulation. Anesthesiology 1984;60:481-2.

5) Domino KB, Bowdle TA, Posner KL, Spitellie PH, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Injuries and liability related to central vascular catheters: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2004;100:1411-8.

6) Ullman JI, Stoelting RK.Internal jugular vein location with the ultrasound Doppler blood flow detector. Anesth Analg 1978;57:118.

7) Sayin MM, Mercan A, Koner O, Ture H, Celebi S, Sozubir S, et al. Internal jugular vein diameter in pediatric patients: are the J-shaped guidewire diameters bigger than internal jugular vein? An evaluation with ultrasound. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:745-51.

8) Leyvi G, Taylor DG, Reith E, Wasnick JD. Utility of ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in pediatric surgical patients: a clinical series. Paediatr Anaesth 2005;15:953-8.

9) Dalvi P, Desai PM, Sarkar M. Comparative study of central venous cannulation by conventional landmark versus USG guided technique in paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2015;2:39-45.

10) Verghese ST, McGill WA, Patel RI, Sell JE, Midgley FM, Ruttimann UE. Internal jugular vein cannulation in infants: palpation vs imaging. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:1078.

11) Troianos CA, Kuwik RJ, Pasqual JR, Lim AJ, Odasso DP. Internal jugular vein and carotid artery anatomic relation as determined by ultrasonography. Anesthesiology 1996;85:43-8.

12) Alderson PJ, Burrows FA, Stemp LI, Holtby HM. Use of ultrasound to evaluate internal jugular vein anatomy and to facilitate central venous cannulation in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 1993;70:145-8.

13) Cobb LM, Vinocur CD, Wagner CW, Weintraub WH. The central venous anatomy in infants. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;165:230-4.

14) Mallinson C, Bennett J, Hodgson P, Petros AJ. Position of the internal jugular vein in children. A study of the anatomy using ultrasonography. Paediatr Anaesth 1999;9:111-4.

15) Kim KO, Jo JY, Oh AY, Kim HS, Kim CS. Optimal depth of insertion of CVP catheter using the right third intercostal space in children. Korean J Ped Anesth 2002;6:86-90.

16) Prasad SR, Kumar JS, Reddy CK, Maheshwar MU. Ultrasonographic study of anatomical characteristics of internal jugular vein in relation to common carotid artery. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2014;3:97-101.

17) Nayeemuddin M, Pherwani AD, Asquith JR. Imaging and management of complications of central venous catheters. Clin Radiol 2013;68:529-44.

18) Verghese ST, McGill WA, Patel RI, Sell JE, Midgley FM, Ruttimann UE. Ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous cannulation in infants: a prospective comparison with the traditional palpation method. Anesthesiology 1999;91:71-7.

19) Grebenik CR, Boyce A, Sinclair ME, Evans RD, Mason DG, Martin B. NICE guidelines for central venous catheterization in children. Is the evidence base sufficient? Br J Anaesth 2004;92:827-30.

20) Jijeh AM, Shaath G, Kabbani MS, Elbarbary M, Ismail S. Ultrasound guided vascular access in pediatric cardiac critical care. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2014;26:199-203.

21) Lau CS, Chamberlain RS. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement increases success rates in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Res 2016;80:178-84.