Methods: Sixteen rabbits with a mean weight of 2.68±0.36 kg were randomly assigned either to group NAC (n=8; receiving NAC) or group C (n=8; control group). They underwent a 30-minute period of spinal cord ischemia with double-clamp technique by clamping the abdominal aorta near below the left renal artery and near above the aortic bifurcation. Fifteen minutes before clamping, rabbits received either intravenous NAC (200 mg/kg; group NAC) or normal saline (group C). The subjects were monitored for 24 hours postoperatively and neurological scores were estimated using Tarlov scoring system. In spinal cord tissue samples, levels of malondialdehyde and gluthathione were also measured.
Results: The mean Tarlov score in the treated subjects was significantly higher compared to the controls (3.38±1.30 vs 0.25±0.46; p<0.001). Histopathological examination revealed that the integrity of the spinal cord was relatively preserved in the NAC group, whereas spinal cords from controls indicated evidences of acute neuronal injury. Spinal tissue malondialdehyde levels were significantly lower in the NAC group (21.57±1 vs 30.4±0.76; p<0.001), whereas glutathione levels were significantly higher (1.73±0.10 vs 1.41±0.05; p<0.001).
Conclusion: In this experimental model of spinal cord injury, NAC provided clinical and histopathological improvement. It is suggested that the effects of NAC are owing to its capacity to reduce oxidative stress and enhance the antioxidant properties of the tissues.
The causative mechanism behind spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is likely multifactorial. It is known that the major proportion of the damage occurs during reperfusion when free oxygen radicals induce lipid peroxidation. This leads to functional and structural deterioration. Therefore, prevention of oxidative stress (OS)-induced lipid peroxidation seems to be an important objective among those striving to protect the spinal cord from I/R injury.[4,5] N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a well known antioxidant that has been proven to protect against I/R-induced injury to different organs and to abrogate adult respiratory distress syndrome.[6-8] Some studies have suggested that it reduces I/R damage in the spinal cord and provides a better neurological outcome within a variable dose range.[9-13] However, clarification is still needed regarding the different aspects of spinal cord protection with NAC.
In the present study, the aim was to examine the protective effects of NAC against OS during an experimentally-induced spinal cord I/R injury in rabbits. Our assessment was controlled and included the evaluation of biochemical, morphological, and clinical parameters. To assess the drug’s ability to attenuate or possibly even eliminate neurological dysfunction, we evaluated hind-limb motor function, and to evaluate the drug’s effect on actual tissue injury, we performed a histopathological examination of the spinal cords. Finally, to assess the possible mechanisms behind any protection that might exist, the effects of NAC administration against OS were evaluated by measuring spinal cord levels of malondialdehyde (MDH), the main product of lipid peroxidation in neuronal tissues and other cells[14] and glutathione (GSH), an important endogenous antioxidant.[15]
Anesthesia and monitoring
The animals were anesthetized by an intramuscular
injection of ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine
(5 mg/kg). Supplemental intravenous doses of
ketamine were administered as needed throughout
the experiments. After ensuring an adequate depth of
anesthesia, the abdominal and thoraco-lumbar skin of
the animals was shaved, and the marginal ear vein was
cannulated with a 24-G cannula to administer fluid
and medication. In addition, one of the marginal ear
arteries was cannulated to obtain blood samples and
monitor blood pressure during the surgery. Cefazolin
(10 mg/kg) was given to all animals as a single dose,
and 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) (20 ml/kg/h) was
infused during the surgery. Body temperature was
regulated by means of a heating lamp used throughout
the procedure. The hemodynamics, including blood
pressure and heart rate, were monitored continuously
with a Propaq 104EL monitor (Welch Allyn Protocol,
Inc., Beaverton, Oregon, USA) and recorded at baseline
and at 10-minute intervals during the cross-clamping
and reperfusion periods.
Surgical procedure
After making a midline laparotomy incision of
approximately 5 cm in length, the abdominal aorta
was explored. After reflection of the intestine to the
right, the abdominal aorta was dissected just caudal to
the left renal artery and above the aortic bifurcation.
The aorta was then encircled with a silk ligature, both
distal to the left renal artery and proximal to the aortic
bifurcation to facilitate secure occlusion. After surgical
preparation, the eight rabbits in the intervention group
were infused with 200 mg/kg NAC as a single dose
(Hüsnü Arsan İlaçları A.Ş, İstanbul, Turkey), and the
eight rabbit controls were infused with the same volume
of physiological saline. These infusions were performed
15 minutes before cross-clamping the aorta. All animals
were given heparin sodium (100 units/kg) five minutes
before cross-clamping for anticoagulation. At the time of clamping, the aorta, both distal to the left renal artery
and proximal to the bifurcation, was occluded with
atraumatic vascular clamps so that spinal cord ischemia
was induced. After 30 minutes of ischemia, the ligatures
and cross-clamps were removed, the abdomen was
closed, and the animals were allowed to recover from
anesthesia. The choice of 30 minutes of spinal ischemic
insult was based upon the results of our previous
experimentation using this model.[16,17] Following the
recovery of the rabbits, they were returned to their cages
and again permitted free access to tap water and food,
ad libitum.
Neurological evaluation
The post-I/R neurological status of each animal was
rated by assessing hind-limb function 24 hours after the
procedure using the modified Tarlov scoring system.[18]
The status of the rabbits was assessed by two researchers
who were blinded to the treatment arm (intervention
versus control). During neurological rating, a score
of 0 to 5 was assigned to each animal as follows:
0= n o v oluntary h ind-limb m ovement; 1 = p erceptible
movement of joints; 2= active movement, but unable
to sit without assistance; 3= able to sit, but unable to
hop; 4 = weak hop; 5 = c omplete r ecovery of h ind-limb
function.
Tissue sampling and histopathological evaluation
All rabbits were sacrificed using sodium pentobarbital
(100 mg/kg) administered intravenously through an ear
vein 24 hours after reperfusion. Spinal cord specimens
were resected for pathological assessment as well as
for the measurement of the two biochemical markers.
Lumbar segments (L4-L5) of the spinal cords were
then immediately procured and flash-fixed in 10%
buffered formalin. These segments were embedded
in paraffin, and serial transverse sections were cut
(4µ) for hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) and phosphotungstic
acid (PTA) staining. The histopathologists, who were
also blinded to the treatment arm, then performed
their evaluations. The existence of perineuronal edema,
glial cell proliferation, Nissl bodies, and new capillary
proliferation was graded qualitatively. Grade 1 indicated
a mild-to-moderate increase in these parameters while
grade 2 indicated a severe increase in these parameters.
Five serial sections from each animal were graded
according to these criteria, and the results in the
intervention group and control group were compared.
Analysis of the biochemical markers of oxidative
reactions
Spinal tissue MDH and GSH levels were measured
in the lumbar part of the spinal column (SC) by
spectrophotometry,[19] and the samples were stored at -70 °C until analysis. Lipid peroxidation was quantified
by measuring the formation of thiobarbituric acid
reactive substances (TBARS). The tissue samples were
then briefly homogenized in ice-cold trichloroacetic
acid (1 g tissue in 10 ml 10% trichloroacetic acid) in
a Heidolph Diax 900 tissue homogenizer (Heidolph
Instruments GmbH & Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany).
Following centrifugation of the homogenate at
3.000 rpm for 10 minutes (Hermle Z 323 K, HERMLE
Labortechnik GmbH, Wehingen, Germany), 750 µl
of supernatant was added to an equal volume of
0.67% (m/v) thiobarbituric acid and heated at 100 °C
for 15 minutes. The absorbance of the samples was
measured at 535 nm using a Shimadzu UV-1208
spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments,
Inc., Columbia, Maryland, USA). Lipid peroxide levels
were expressed in terms of MDA equivalents using an
extinction coefficient of 1.56x10-5 mol-1cm-1.
Glutathione levels were determined by means of a modified Ellman method.[20] After centrifugation of the homogenate at 3.000 rpm for 10 min, 0.5 ml of supernatant was briefly added to the 2 ml of 0.3M Na2HPO42H2O solution. Then 0.2 ml of dithiobisnitrobenzoate (0.4 mg/ml 1% sodium citrate) was added, and the absorbance at 412 nm was measured immediately after mixing. The GSH levels were then calculated using an extinction coefficient of 13.600 mol-1 cm-1.
Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed using the Statistical
Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc, Chicago,
Illinois, USA) for Wíndows version 11.5, and all values
were presented as means ± standard deviation. Mann
Whitney U-tests were used to compare the two groups
with respect to mean baseline weight, mean heart rate,
and blood pressure at baseline during cross-clamping
as well as the reperfusion and mean Tarlov scores. In
addition, spinal cord MDH and GTH levels at 24-hour
post-reperfusion were also compared. Three repeat
measurements of the blood pressure and heart rate
were compared using the Friedman test. The post-hoc
multiple comparisons test was used to identify different
pairs after statistically significant Friedman test results.
The histopathological differences in serial sections were
analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test. A p value of
less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Neurologic functional evaluation
The mean neurological score of the rabbits in the
intervention group were significantly higher after 24
hours of reperfusion (Figure 1). The mean Tarlov score
was 3.38±1.30 in the intervention group and 0.25±0.46
in the control group (p=0.000<0.001). Among the
treated animals, two were classified as grade 5 at
24-hour reperfusion, two were grade 4, one was grade
3, and three were grade 2. The controls had six rabbits
categorized as grade 0 at 24-hour reperfusion and two
were grade 1.
Histopathology
A comparison of the intervention and control groups
revealed significant differences in histopathology (p=0.000<0.001). The group treated with NAC appeared
to be almost intact when examined with light microscopy,
with only minimal evidence of cellular damage. The
neurons, vascular structures, and glial cells seemed to
be nearly normal, with only mild pericellular edema
(Figures 2a and 2b). An examination of the control group
spinal cords revealed considerable neuronal degeneration.
Perineuronal edema was also increased in this group.
Additionally, the ependymal cells had euchromatic nuclei
and seemed to be swollen. There also was an increased
proliferation of capillaries and glial cells, especially
around the neurons (Figures 2c and 2d). Furthermore,
there were many areas of vacuolar degeneration in the
anterior and posterior horns of the gray matter in the
control group. Moreover, higher numbers of Nissl bodies
were noted in the PTA-stained slides from the rabbits in
the control group, whereas few were observed in those
treated with NAC.
Biochemical markers
The mean spinal tissue MDA level was significantly
lower in the intervention group (21.57±1.28 nmol/g)
versus the controls (30.4±0.76 nmol/g) (p=0.000<0.001)
(Figure 3). Conversely, the mean tissue GSH level
was s ignificantly h igher i n t he i ntervention g roup
(1.73±0.10 mmol/g) than in the control group
(1.41±0.05 mmol/g) (p=0.000<0.001) (Figure 4).
Figure 3: Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in lumbar spinal column segments 24 hours after reperfusion.
Figure 4: Glutathione (GSH) levels in lumbar spinal column segments 24 hours after reperfusion.
Oxidative stress has been significantly implicated in the pathogenesis of neurological injuries after spinal cord ischemia.[21-23] At the time of reperfusion, the reestablishment of flow replenishes the tissue with vital substances but also releases enormous amounts of toxic metabolites, including free oxygen radicals that were generated during the ischemic period, into the circulation. These radicals are potent initiators of protein degradation and lipid peroxidation, which can in turn lead to membrane dysfunction, alterations in cellular proteins, and cell death.[22,23]
Malondialdehyde and GSH are important in that they can be used to monitor the oxidative and anti-oxidative status of I/R states. Malondialdehyde is the main product of lipid peroxidation in spinal myelin, glial and neuronal membranes, and other cellular elements.[14,24] On the other hand, GSH is an important endogenous anti-oxidant. It reacts with free radicals and further protects cells by maintaining high cellular GSH levels so that the magnitude of the destructive potential of free oxygen radicals during reperfusion can be reduced.[25,26] It has been shown that promotion of GSH synthesis is an effective way to decrease post-traumatic OS, thereby fostering the retention of tissue integrity and function after spinal cord trauma.[27]
In our study, spinal cord MDH levels 24 hours after aortic occlusion were significantly elevated in the control group, implying that free oxygen radicals are involved in I/R neuronal injury. Conversely, we observed less of an increase in the MDH content of the spinal cord when NAC was administered before aortic occlusion. This suggests that NAC reduces OS-induced lipid peroxidation. In addition, higher GSH levels in the rabbits treated with NAC suggest that pre-ischemic NAC administration enhances anti-oxidant activity in the spinal cord.
This intervention group also exhibited better preservation of neurological functions and histological architecture 24 hours after the I/R event, which is consistent with the aforementioned biochemical marker findings.
Several studies have demonstrated that NAC administration ameliorates ischemic myocardial, liver, lung, brain, and muscle injuries.[6,28-31] For example, NAC has been used for many years in the treatment of chronic bronchitis. Cysteine, which functions as an anti-oxidant, is a precursor of GSH, a tripeptide present in high concentrations in most cells, and NAC, which is necessary for GSH regeneration, is a direct scavenger of free radicals and also inhibits inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase expression along with the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1).[32,33]
Khan et al.[11] reported that the best protective effect of NAC was displayed at 150-250 mg/kg in rats with temporary focal cerebral ischemia. The dose of NAC we used was average relative to the doses used in previously-reported I/R studies.[8-11,13,29,34] Çakır et al.[9] demonstrated that NAC and hypothermia protect rabbit spinal cords against ischemic injury. In their study, the combination of NAC and hypothermia offered superior protection to the use of NAC alone. Ortiz-Gómez et al.[13] reported on cerebrospinal fluid decompression in which the combination of methylprednisolone and NAC reduced the complications of acute paraplegia. In a renal I/R study, Erbaş et al.[34] found that the protective effect of NAC could be the result of the stimulatory effect that it has on arginase activity, which may result in the inhibition of inducible NO activity. This would then lead to decreased plasma NO levels.
Hancı et al.[12] investigated the biochemical effectiveness of methylprednisolone and NAC in experimental spinal cord injuries in rats and found potential biochemical benefits in preventing secondary injuries. They found lower mean MDH values and higher superoxyde dismutase values compared to the control group. These results were similar to our study, but we also showed histopathological and functional improvement in the rabbits treated with NAC.[12]
Some of the beneficial effects of NAC have been attributed to its chemical structure, which includes a compound containing thiol. In studies involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and pre-conditioning, thiol-containing compounds have been shown to be beneficial as a potential defense system against I/R reperfusion-related OS.[35] According to Fischer et al.,[8] 100 mg/kg of NAC administered 10 min before CPB followed by 20 mg/kg/h of continuous infusion until one hour after CPB reduces OS during this process. In addition, Koramaz et al.[36] reported that NAC-supplemented cold-blood cardioplegia minimizes myocardial injury in the early hours both during and after cardiac surgery. Andersen et al.[37] demonstrated that the anti-oxidant and scavenger effects of NAC reduce the neutrophil oxidative burst response usually observed in patients subjected to CPB and cardioplegic arrest. N-acetylcysteine also has been used successfully in clinical studies for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.[38]
In our study, we demonstrated the protective effects of NAC in an experimental spinal cord injury model. New clinical studies have also shown the beneficial effects of NAC in preventing I/R injuries with severe burns and liver transplantation as well as renal and arthroscopic knee surgery.[39-43]
To receive the full potential benefit of its antioxidant properties, NAC administration should probably be initiated before aortic occlusion. Therefore, we did this before cross-clamping so that it might pre-condition the tissue and enhance the tissue’s own defenses before exposure to the increased OS that occurs after clamping.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the prophylactic use of intravenous NAC exerts a protective effect against spinal cord I/R injury in rabbits. This is most likely because of its capacity to reduce OS and enhance the tissue’s antioxidant properties. However, our study does not completely elucidate the underlying protective mechanism. The protective effect of NAC is probably multifactorial, and we believe that further experimental and clinical studies are required to further explore its benefits. Once the mechanisms behind this protection are clarified and the optimum dose and dosing schedule are determined, NAC may become a useful therapeutic tool to prevent the neurological sequelae currently associated with surgery for thoracoabdominal aneurysms.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect
to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Wan IY, Angelini GD, Bryan AJ, Ryder I, Underwood MJ.
Prevention of spinal cord ischaemia during descending
thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Eur J
Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:203-13.
2) Salzano RP Jr, Ellison LH, Altonji PF, Richter J, Deckers PJ.
Regional deep hypothermia of the spinal cord protects against
ischemic injury during thoracic aortic cross-clamping. Ann
Thorac Surg 1994;57:65-70.
3) Svensson LG, Von Ritter CM, Groeneveld HT, Rickards ES,
Hunter SJ, Robinson MF, et al. Cross-clamping of the thoracic
aorta. Influence of aortic shunts, laminectomy, papaverine,
calcium channel blocker, allopurinol, and superoxide
dismutase on spinal cord blood flow and paraplegia in
baboons. Ann Surg 1986;204:38-47.
4) Grisotto PC, dos Santos AC, Coutinho-Netto J, Cherri J,
Piccinato CE. Indicators of oxidative injury and alterations
of the cell membrane in the skeletal muscle of rats submitted
to ischemia and reperfusion. J Surg Res 2000;92:1-6.
5) Qayumi AK, Janusz MT, Dorovini-Zis K, Lyster DM,
Jamieson WR, Poostizadeh A, et al. Additive effect of
allopurinol and deferoxamine in the prevention of spinal cord
injury caused by aortic crossclamping. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 1994;107:1203-9.
6) Weinbroum AA, Kluger Y, Ben Abraham R, Shapira
I, Karchevski E, Rudick V. Lung preconditioning with
N-acetyl-L-cysteine prevents reperfusion injury after liver
no flow-reflow: a dose-response study. Transplantation
2001;71:300-6.
7) Matsumoto K, Hashimoto S, Gon Y, Nakayama T, Takizawa
H, Horie T. N-acetylcysteine inhibits IL-1 alpha-induced
IL-8 secretion by bronchial epithelial cells. Respir Med
1998;92:512-5.
8) Fischer UM, Cox CS Jr, Allen SJ, Stewart RH, Mehlhorn
U, Laine GA. The antioxidant N-acetylcysteine preserves
myocardial function and diminishes oxidative stress after
cardioplegic arrest. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1483-8.
9) Cakir O, Erdem K, Oruc A, Kilinc N, Eren N. Neuroprotective
effect of N-acetylcysteine and hypothermia on the spinal cord
ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Surg 2003;11:375-9.
10) Boga M, Discigil B, Ozkisacik EA, Gurcun U, Badak MI,
Dikicioglu E, et al. The combined effect of iloprost and
N-acetylcysteine in preventing spinal cord ischemia in
rabbits. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31:366-72.
11) Khan M, Sekhon B, Jatana M, Giri S, Gilg AG, Sekhon C,
et al. Administration of N-acetylcysteine after focal cerebral
ischemia protects brain and reduces inflammation in a rat
model of experimental stroke. J Neurosci Res 2004;76:519-27.
12) Hanci V, Kerimoğlu A, Koca K, Başkesen A, Kiliç K, Taştekin
D. The biochemical effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in
experimental spinal cord injury in rats. Ulus Travma Acil
Cerrahi Derg 2010;16:15-21.
13) Ortiz-Gómez JR, González-Solis FJ, Fernández-Alonso L,
Bilbao JI. Reversal of acute paraplegia with cerebrospinal
fluid drainage after endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm
repair. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1288-9.
14) Rawe SE, Lee WA, Perot PL. Spinal cord glucose utilization
after experimental spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery
1981;9:40-7.
15) Kaushik S, Kaur J. Chronic cold exposure affects the
antioxidant defense system in various rat tissues. Clin Chim
Acta 2003;333:69-77.
16) Kaplan S, Ulus AT, Tütün U, Aksöyek A, Ozgencil E, Saritaş
Z, et al. Effect of Mg2SO4 usage on spinal cord ischemiareperfusion
injury: electron microscopic and functional
evaluation. Eur Surg Res 2004;36:20-5.
17) Kaplan S, Bisleri G, Morgan JA, Cheema FH, Oz MC.
Resveratrol, a natural red wine polyphenol, reduces ischemiareperfusion-
induced spinal cord injury. Ann Thorac Surg
2005;80:2242-9.
18) Nakao Y, Otani H, Yamamura T, Hattori R, Osako M,
Imamura H. Insulin-like growth factor 1 prevents neuronal
cell death and paraplegia in the rabbit model of spinal cord
ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:136-43.
19) Casini AF, Ferrali M, Pompella A, Maellaro E, Comporti
M. Lipid peroxidation and cellular damage in extrahepatic
tissues of bromobenzene-intoxicated mice. Am J Pathol
1986;123:520-31.
20) Aykaç G, Uysal M, Yalçin AS, Koçak-Toker N, Sivas A, Oz
H. The effect of chronic ethanol ingestion on hepatic lipid
peroxide, glutathione, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione
transferase in rats. Toxicology 1985;36:71-6.
21) Wada T, Yao H, Miyamoto T, Mukai S, Yamamura M.
Prevention and detection of spinal cord injury during thoracic
and thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. Ann Thorac Surg
2001;72:80-4.
22) Ueno T, Furukawa K, Katayama Y, Suda H, Itoh T. Spinal
cord protection: development of a paraplegia-preventive
solution. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:116-20.
23) Agee JM, Flanagan T, Blackbourne LH, Kron IL, Tribble
CG. Reducing postischemic paraplegia using conjugated
superoxide dismutase. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:911-4.
24) Sinha K, Chaudhary G, Gupta YK. Protective effect of
resveratrol against oxidative stress in middle cerebral artery
occlusion model of stroke in rats. Life Sci 2002;71:655-65.
25) Zhao X, Alexander JS, Zhang S, Zhu Y, Sieber NJ, Aw TY,
Carden DL. Redox regulation of endothelial barrier integrity.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2001;281:L879-86.
26) Fukuzawa K, Emre S, Senyuz O, Acarli K, Schwartz ME,
Miller CM. N-acetylcysteine ameliorates reperfusion injury
after warm hepatic ischemia. Transplantation 1995;59:6-9.
27) Kamencic H, Griebel RW, Lyon AW, Paterson PG, Juurlink
BH. Promoting glutathione synthesis after spinal cord trauma
decreases secondary damage and promotes retention of
function. FASEB J 2001;15:243-250.
28) Cuzzocrea S, Mazzon E, Costantino G, Serraino I, Dugo L, Calabrò G, et al. Beneficial effects of n-acetylcysteine on
ischaemic brain injury. Br J Pharmacol 2000;130:1219-26.
29) Weinbroum AA, Rudick V, Ben-Abraham R, Karchevski E.
N-acetyl-L-cysteine for preventing lung reperfusion injury
after liver ischemia-reperfusion: a possible dual protective
mechanism in a dose-response study. Transplantation
2000;69:853-9.
30) Menasché P, Grousset C, Gauduel Y, Mouas C, Piwnica A.
Maintenance of the myocardial thiol pool by N-acetylcysteine.
An effective means of improving cardioplegic protection.J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:936-44.
31) Koksal C, Bozkurt AK, Cangel U, Ustundag N, Konukoglu
D, Musellim B, et al. Attenuation of ischemia/reperfusion
injury by N-acetylcysteine in a rat hind limb model. J Surg
Res 2003;111:236-9.
32) Tredger JM. N-acetylcysteine: not simply a glutathione
precursor. Transplantation 2000;69:703-4.
33) Harrison PM, Wendon JA, Gimson AE, Alexander GJ,
Williams R. Improvement by acetylcysteine of hemodynamics
and oxygen transport in fulminant hepatic failure. N Engl J
Med 1991;324:1852-7.
34) Erbas H, Aydogdu N, Kaymak K. Effects of N-acetylcysteine
on arginase, ornithine and nitric oxide in renal ischemiareperfusion
injury. Pharmacol Res 2004;50:523-7.
35) Dhalla NS, Elmoselhi AB, Hata T, Makino N. Status
of myocardial antioxidants in ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Cardiovasc Res 2000;47:446-56.
36) Koramaz I, Pulathan Z, Usta S, Karahan SC, Alver A, Yaris
E, et al. Cardioprotective effect of cold-blood cardioplegia
enriched with N-acetylcysteine during coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:613-8.
37) Andersen LW, Thiis J, Kharazmi A, Rygg I. The role of
N-acetylcystein administration on the oxidative response
of neutrophils during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion
1995;10:21-6.
38) Sochman J, Vrbská J, Musilová B, Rocek M. Infarct Size
Limitation: acute N-acetylcysteine defense (ISLAND trial):
preliminary analysis and report after the first 30 patients.
Clin Cardiol 1996;19:94-100.
39) Erturk E, Cekic B, Geze S, Kosucu M, Coskun I, Eroglu
A, et al. Comparison of the effect of propofol and N-acetyl
cysteine in preventing ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Eur J
Anaesthesiol 2009;26:279-84.
40) Csontos C, Rezman B, Foldi V, Bogar L, Drenkovics L,
Röth E, et al. Effect of N-acetylcysteine treatment on
oxidative stress and inflammation after severe burn. Burns
2012;38:428-37.
41) Koca K, Yurttas Y, Cayci T, Bilgic S, Kaldirim U, Durusu
M, et al. The role of preconditioning and N-acetylcysteine
on oxidative stress resulting from tourniquet-induced
ischemia-reperfusion in arthroscopic knee surgery. J Trauma
2011;70:717-23.