On the operating table, a physical examination presented the appearance of respiratory distress with cyanotic limbs. In addition, an electrocardiogram revealed sinus tachycardia at a rate of 180 per minute. The transcutaneous oxygen saturation and arterial blood pressure were routinely monitored throughout the surgery, and another electrocardiogram was performed. Preoperatively, a radiological scope determined that the coil had migrated from the iliac vein to the right ventricle during the short transport time to the operating room (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Preoperative view from a radiological scope of the coil that immigrated into heart.
Under general anesthesia, a median sternotomy was initially performed. Propofol (2-5 mg/kg/h) and fentanyl citrate (5-10 microgr/kg/h) were given to the patient intravenously, and inhalational sevoflurane was used for general anesthesia. Additionally, heparin (350 units/per kg) was given to reach the activated clotted time (ACT) of over 400 seconds. Following a pericardiectomy, aorto-bicaval cannulation was performed while the patient’s body temperature was within 28 °C of the core body temperature. A crossclamp was then applied to both the aortae and pulmonary artery to prevent the coil from continuing to migrate more distally through the lungs. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was accomplished with a centrifugal pump and membrane oxygenator. For myocardial protection, we used two steps of cardioplegia: 500 ml of normothermic blood cardioplegia and cold cardioplegia in 10 ml/per kg in 40 mmHg pressure. Additive cardioplegia doses were not necessary due to the short period of cardiac arrest. After securing the caval blood flow with tightened snears over cannulas, a right atriotomy was performed. The coil was observed between the tricuspidal valvular structures and was reaching into the right ventricle with its free end. It was subsequently gently removed to avoid any harm to the tricuspid valve (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Postoperative picture of the removed coil.
The right atriotomy was closed, and the CPB was ended. The total cardiopulmonary time was 41 minutes, and the total cross-clamp time was 17 minutes. Heparin antagonization was maintained by protamine sulfate. The existing PDA between the left pulmonary artery and aortae was occluded via transfiction sutures with clear visualization, and an epicardial pace maker was also replaced. After the hemostasis maneuvers, the surgical drains were replaced, and the sternum was closed. The patient was next transported to the cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit (ICU). The intubation time was 180 minutes, and the total drainage volume was 210 milliliters. Postoperative transthoracic echocardiograms verified the closure of the PDA, and the patient was uneventfully discharged on postoperative day eight.
Persistent patency of the ductus arteriosus is defined as PDA, a relatively common congenital cardiac abnormality. The overall incidence rate varies between 0.02 and 0.006% of live births, and females are twice as likely to have it. High altitude births, perinatal asphyxia, lower birth weights, and premature births may elevate the risk of PDA, which differs according to the age of the patient and the presenting symptoms. A left to right flow pattern usually is caused by an overload of pulmonary vascular resistance. In addition, an adult may rarely present with a murmur which is caused by a small and tolerated PDA. Morphologically, this defect is mostly located between the left pulmonary artery and proximal part of the descending aortae. However, there have been reports of a few cases that presented between the right pulmonary artery and main pulmonary artery. Atypical localizations tend to be concordant with cardiac and other defects. Mortality rates range from 0.5-4% depending on the severity of the left to right shunt and the patient’s age.[2] Differential diagnoses may include sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA), aortopulmonary window, coronary artery fistula, and atypical forms of tetralogy of Fallot.
Treatment of PDA starts with the administration of indomethacin and/or ibuprofen at early diagnosis.[3] The success of treatment with intravenous medication has been questionable in some cases.[3] Thus, over the last three decades, several techniques of catheterization closure have been described.[4] The success rate is significantly higher for PDA if it has a diameter smaller than 2.5 mm. For PDA equal to or larger than 3 mm diameter, other occlusion techniques are needed besides catheterization.
There are risks involved with catheterization, for example embolization of the occlusive device, recurrent PDA, central or peripheral arterial or venous vascular injury, stroke, mild to severe lower limb ischemia, and death. Large ductus treatments include a conventional left thoracotomy and VATS. The thoracotomy approach may result in surgical ligation or surgical ligation with division, but this technique has a very low mortality and morbidity risk when performed by experienced hands and provides excellent results. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a more difficult technique, especially in patients with calcification or those with a bigger ductus. In those cases, there is a greater risk of hemorrhage and vascular injury.[5] When VATS or a conventional posterolateral thoracotomy are not the best options, a median sternotomy with/without CPB can be performed as a last resort.
In our opinion, percutaneous coil occlusion techniques are cost-effective, safe, and less traumatic for the patient. Furthermore, they have been shown to reduce the recurrence rate.[4] Small to moderate PDA of between 1 and 2 mm diameters are the best candidates for percutaneous transcatheter coil occlusion. Larger PDA and/or cases with insufficient PDA neck morphology require a surgical approach for the best results. Coil occlusions also come with the risk of of complications, as was the case with our patient. Thus, these techniques may only be performed by keeping in mind the possibility of the need for surgical support in case of emergency.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with
respect to the authorship and/or publication of this
article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Gross RE, Hubbard JP. Landmark article Feb 25, 1939:
Surgical ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus. Report of first
successful case. By Robert E. Gross and John P. Hubbard
JAMA 1984;251:1201-2.
2) Dudell GG, Gersony WM. Patent ductus arteriosus in neonates
with severe respiratory disease. J Pediatr 1984;104:915-20.
3) Sekar KC, Corff KE. Treatment of patent ductus arteriosus:
indomethacin or ibuprofen? J Perinatol 2008;28 Suppl 1:S60-
2) doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.52.