Methods: Between October 2006 and February 2012, nine patients (5 males, 4 females; mean age 18.4±6.3 years; range 8 to 27 years) underwent off-pump PVI with an injectable stent. Echocardiography revealed severe pulmonary valve regurgitation, progressive right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction in all patients. No residual ventricular septal defect (VSD) was seen.
Results: We implanted a 23 mm valve in one patient, a 25 mm valve in two patients, a 27 mm valve in two patients, a 29 mm valve in three patients and a 31 mm valve in one patient. Postoperative echocardiographic examination revealed no regurgitation in seven patients with mild valve regurgitation in two patients. The mean peak systolic gradient was 12.6±3.7 mmHg, while the mean systolic gradient was 8.3±2.4 mmHg. The mean follow-up was 34±17 months (range, 1.5 to 58 months). None of the patients needed reoperation.
Conclusion: The advantages of off-pump PVI include the applicability without cardiopulmonary bypass, availability of large-sized valves, the absence of any interventional limitation and the opportunity for fixation into the pulmonary artery to avoid valve migration. No-react nature of the valve also minimizes the degeneration risk of the valve.
Table 1: Preoperative demographic data of patients
Surgical technique
A transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
probe was inserted immediately after intubation,
and all operations were performed via a median
sternotomy. First, the RV and pulmonary artery
(PA) with its bifurcation were carefully dissected.
Two purse string sutures were then placed onto the
right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) about 2.5 cm
proximal to the pulmonic valve. Next, heparin was
administered in doses of 100 IU/kg. After an
incision was made at the middle of the sutured
site, the introducer tip was put into place with the
injector gun, and sutures were snugged down to
avoid bleeding. After sliding the introducer tip back,
the correct position of the trocar was confirmed
by TEE. When this could be verified visually, the
plunger was pressed down, and the valve was fully
ejected. The purse string sutures were then tightened
after the injector was gently pulled out from the
RVOT incision. This was followed by inserting three
or four sutures at the proximal and distal site of the
valve to prevent valve migration. After assessing the
valve performance and localization, the sternum was
closed in a routine fashion.
Table 2: Pre- and postoperative echocardiographic measurements
One of the most important parameters in PR development involving TOF patients is whether a transannular patch was applied in prior surgery. The transannular patch repair rate varies between centers, but it is accepted that this type of repair is an independent risk factor, especially in patients who have undergone an extended right ventriculotomy.[2] The patch leads to PR, RV enlargement, and an increase in QRS duration.[1] In a recent large, multi-center study, Gatzoulis et al.[7] demonstrated that outflow tract patching significantly increases the incidence of ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death. In addition, PVR in patients with PR and dilatation of the RV demonstrated a decrease in ventricular arrhythmias and improvement in RV functions.[8] I n a ll o f o ur patients, a transannular patch was applied during previous surgery, and they had severe PVR. However, we did not encounter preoperative or postoperative arrhythmia and saw no calcification over these patches during surgery.
Although PVR should be performed without hesitation in severe PR, the optimal timing for PVR still remains controversial. Thus far, exercise intolerance, ventricular arrhythmias, progressive RV dilatation, and the onset of tricuspid regurgitation have been used as indicators for reintervention.[9] Furthermore, in asymptomatic patients with RV dilatation, PVR has been considered for the prevention and reduction of RV dilatation. A more aggressive approach with the timely correction of PR is advocated by Marianeschi et al.[4] It is also interesting to note that Buechel et al.[10] observed that none of their patients with a right ventricle enddiastolic volume (RVEDV) above 200 mL/m2 showed normalization of RV function. Although there are different indication aspects for PVR, generally the combination of severe PR and diminished exercise capacity and/or clinical arrhythmia secondary to right heart failure are recognized as indications for PVR.
Also, moderate-to-severe RV enlargement may be another indication, but what constitutes this degree of enlargement is not yet clear.[6] I n o ur p atients, t he preoperative mean RVEDV was 82 mL/m2, and we considered severe PR and diminished exercise capacity for PVR indication. Our two patients (patients 4 and 5) who had a considerably short time interval between the TOF repair and off-pump PVR, had RVEDVs of 80.2 and 91.4 along with RV ejection fraction (RVEF) rates of 40% and 45%, respectively. We decided on an early PVR for these two patients because of diminished EF rates in conjunction with severe PR and exercise intolerance.
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is an option in patients with severe PR. It minimizes invasiveness and may be considered in suitable cases. However, there are disadvantages with this procedure, including access limitation, valve size inadequacy, and migration of the device.[11] Although Khambadkone and Bonhoeffer[12] reported that percutaneous pulmonary valve sizes ranging from 18 mm to 22 mm are available, the annular size of the PA in this patient population is often larger than 22 mm due to the natural progression of the PR. Hazekamp et al.[2] r eported a m ean d iameter of 25±1.8 mm in 51 patients who underwent late conventional surgical PVR after repair of TOF. These mean diameters show that the small size of percutaneous pulmonary valves is a significant limitation to the use of this technique when compared with the surgical option. Nonetheless, the ability to utilize transmural suturing to avoid valve migration after deployment is another important advantage of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Marianeschi et al.[4] reported the early results of 12 patients from three different centers (including two from our institution) who underwent offpump pulmonary valve implantation, and the mean implanted prosthetic valve size was 26.8±2.9. In our nine patients, although there was one case with a 23 mm valve (patient # 1), the mean implanted prosthetic valve size was 27.2±2.5 mm. In patients implanted with small-sized valve (patient # 1) preoperatively there were no gradients over RVOT, and the measured pulmonary annulus diameter allowed only up to a 23 mm valve implantation. However, our patient with the 23 mm valve remains free of valve degeneration symptoms.
It is essential to use CPB when there is leftto- right shunt and/or tricuspid valve regurgitation related to RV dilatation. These defects should be repaired under CPB, and injectable pulmonic valve implantation should be performed after the repair. Our patients had neither residual septal defects nor moderate or severe tricuspid valve regurgitation, so CPB was not necessary. This may have been due to our surgical PVR indication criteria which does not allow severe RV dilatation and prevents severe tricuspid insufficiency.
As reported in other clinical studies, we also observed excellent RV remodeling after off-pump pulmonary valve implantation. A marked decrease in RVEDV and increase in RVEF were seen even in the first-week echocardiographies, and this improvement in RV functions progressed in the subsequent echocardiography controls. Van Straten et al.[13] reported that both diastolic and systolic functions of RV normalize late in the PVR process in patients after the primary repair of TOF. Furthermore, Dave et al.[14] showed a strong and significant correlation between preoperative RVEDV and its value at the postoperative sixth month. Similarly, the fast RV improvement after surgery in our patients could be related to performing the surgical intervention before the development of severe RV dilatation.
We determined that off-pump pulmonary valve implantation has many advantages for select patients, including PVR without bypass, the applicability of large valve sizes, no access limitation, and opportunities for fixation. Even though larger series and longer term follow-up periods are needed, our early and mid-term results are encouraging regarding off-pump pulmonary valve implantation in patients suffering from PR, especially after TOF correction.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with
respect to the authorship and/or publication of this
article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Nollert GD, Däbritz SH, Schmoeckel M, Vicol C, Reichart
B. Risk factors for sudden death after repair of tetralogy of
Fallot. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1901-5.
2) Hazekamp MG, Kurvers MM, Schoof PH, Vliegen HW,
Mulder BM, Roest AA, et al. Pulmonary valve insertion late
after repair of Fallot\'s tetralogy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2001;19:667-70.
3) Berdat PA, Carrel T. Off-pump pulmonary valve replacement
with the new Shelhigh Injectable Stented Pulmonic Valve. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1192-3.
4) Marianeschi SM, Santoro F, Ribera E, Catena E, Vignati G,
Ghiselli S, et al. Pulmonary valve implantation with the new Shelhigh Injectable Stented Pulmonic Valve. Ann Thorac
Surg 2008;86:1466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.085.
5) Nollert G, Fischlein T, Bouterwek S, Böhmer C, Klinner
W, Reichart B. Long-term survival in patients with repair
of tetralogy of Fallot: 36-year follow-up of 490 survivors
of the first year after surgical repair. J Am Coll Cardiol
1997;30:1374-83.
6) Burchill LJ, Wald RM, Harris L, Colman JM, Silversides
CK. Pulmonary valve replacement in adults with repaired
tetralogy of Fallot. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr
Card Surg Annu 2011;14:92-7. doi: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2011.01.016.
7) Gatzoulis MA, Balaji S, Webber SA, Siu SC, Hokanson JS,
Poile C, et al. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac
death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre
study. Lancet 2000;356:975-81.
8) Therrien J, Provost Y, Merchant N, Williams W, Colman J,
Webb G. Optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement
in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Am J Cardiol
2005;95:779-82.
9) van der Wall EE, Mulder BJ. Pulmonary valve replacement in
patients with tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary regurgitation:
early surgery similar to optimal timing of surgery? Eur Heart J 2005;26:2614-5.
10) Buechel ER, Dave HH, Kellenberger CJ, Dodge-Khatami
A, Pretre R, Berger F, et al. Remodelling of the right
ventricle after early pulmonary valve replacement in
children with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: assessment
by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J
2005;26:2721-7.
11) Nordmeyer J, Coats L, Bonhoeffer P. Current experience
with percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Semin
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;18:122-5.
12) Khambadkone S, Bonhoeffer P. Percutaneous pulmonary
valve implantation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr
Card Surg Annu 2006:23-8.