There are no findings on a physical examination that suggest the presence of pericardial cysts. They are usually detected on routine radiological studies or incidentally in the operating room. In general, they are asymptomatic, unless they infect or compress on the surrounding structures when they increase in size. Pericardial cysts are commonly unilocular, but they may appear to be multilocular due to constrictive fibrous bands.[3] The variety in location of mesothelial cysts is related to embryological reasons. They can occur anywhere but are only rarely found in the mediastinum between the anterior chest wall and the right heart. Fusion of the mesenchymal coelomic lacunae originates from the pleural and pericardial cavity on one side and the peritoneal cavity on the other, and they are divided by the anteroposterior development of the septum transversum. Incomplete fusion of a lacunae, especially at the level of the pericardial coelom, may result in the formation of a mesothelial cyst, and this kind of fusion or the secondary migration of an isolated element can also occur at the level of the parietal pleura, mediastinal pleura, or septum transversum, which might explain the unusual locations of mesothelial cysts.[4]
These cysts are histologically lined with a single layer of mesothelial cells, with the remainder of the wall being composed of connective tissue with collagen and elastic fibers. Additionally, they contain a clear, water-like fluid.[4]
Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment of pericardial mesothelial inclusion cysts, but the defining factors are the qualification of the lesions and whether or not there are symptoms related to compression. Many authors have suggested surgical excision of the mass, but this is a complicated procedure and has the risk of malignancy.[5] Endoscopic resection or percutaneous aspiration of the cyst are also treatment options.[3,6]
Figure 2: The mass visualized on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (white arrow).
Figure 3: A view of the mass in the intraoperative process (white arrow).
Figure 4: Cyst structure covered by a single-layer, smooth epithelium (H-E x 40).
An isolated cystic mass located adjacent to the heart primarily should raise the possibility of a neurenteric cyst, a bronchogenic, esophageal cyst, lymphangioma, or a pericardial cyst.
Symptoms of atypical chest pain, dyspnea, and persistent cough are indicated in about one-third of the patients with pericardial mesothelial inclusion cysts. Other complications that have been reported in the literature include rupture, cardiac tamponade, mitral valve prolapse, obstruction of the right main stem bronchus, atrial fibrillation, and erosion into adjacent structures, for example the right ventricular wall or superior vena cava (SVC).
Myxomas are the most common primary cardiac neoplasms, constituting about half of all cardiac tumors, followed by lipomas. Cardiac lipomas are distributed throughout the heart but are usually located in the subepicardial region.
With the exception of myomas, lesions in the right side of the heart should raise the suspicion of malignancy, and metastases through transvenous invasion are more common with these lesions than with primary malignant cardiac tumors.[7] Beyond hematogenous and lymphatic spread, direct continuous extension to the myocardium or pericardium may also happen. Among neoplasms, melanoma has the highest frequency of metastases to the heart, followed by malignant germ cell tumors, leukemia, lymphoma, lung cancer, and other various sarcomas.[8]
Additionally, lymphomas also have a very high frequency of metastases to the heart. Although primary cardiac lymphoma is very rare, some patients with disseminated lymphoma have cardiac metastases. In most cases, however, lymphomas typically infiltrate the myocardium and pericardium.
We preferred to treat our patient with surgical excision because he was symptomatic, and we believe this should be the treatment of choice for masses which cause complicated, severe symptoms and for those that have reached huge dimensions or have the risk of malignancy. There are some studies which have recommended excision with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB),[5,6] but we were able to excise the mass in our patient successfully via a lateral thoracotomy without performing CPB because of its location.
In conclusion, we believe that surgical resection of a pericardial cyst should be performed when malignancy is suspected, when the diagnosis is uncertain, or when the patient has symptoms due to complications and is unresponsive to other treatment options.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with
respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Omeroglu SN, Omeroglu A, Ardal H, Erkilinc A, Bal E,
Ipek G, et al. Epicardial mesothelial cyst located over the
left anterior descending coronary artery. Tex Heart Inst J
2004;31:313-5.
2) Generali T, Garatti A, Gagliardotto P, Frigiola A. Right
mesothelial pericardial cyst determining intractable atrial
arrhythmias. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011 ;12:837-
9) doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.261594.
3) Mouroux J, Venissac N, Leo F, Guillot F, Padovani B,
Hofman P. Usual and unusual locations of intrathoracic
mesothelial cysts. Is endoscopic resection always possible?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:684-8.
4) Riquet M, Dujon A, Nouvet G, Fromentin JC, Houel R,
Debesse B. Mesothelial cyst of pleuro-parietal origin. Rev
Mal Respir 1992;9:216-8. [Abstract]
5) Comoglio C, Sansone F, Delsedime L, Campanella A, Ceresa
F, Rinaldi M. Mesothelial cyst of the pericardium, absent on
earlier computed tomography. Tex Heart Inst J 2010;37:354-7.
6) Sharma R, Harden S, Peebles C, Dawkins KD. Percutaneous
aspiration of a pericardial cyst: an acceptable treatment for a
rare disorder. Heart 2007;93:22.