Methods: Between May 2009 and August 2012, 43 patients (29 males, 14 females; mean age 65.4 years; range 39 to 87 years) with malignant esophageal stenoses, who underwent esophageal stent implementation in Thoracic Surgery Department of Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital were included in this study. The self expandable metalic stents (SEMS) was chosen in 38 patients with stenotic lesion which located middle and lower esophagus, and the self expandable plastic stents (SEPS) was chosen in five patient with fistula or upper esophageal localization. The mean follow-up was nine months (1 to 39 months). Four patients are live and has been under follow-up.
Results: A total of 54 stents were placed in 43 patients. Fortynine covered SEMSs were placed in 38 patients and five covered SEPSs were placed in five patients. Eight of the patients with middle and lower esophageal stenosis needed two covered SEMS and one with middle esophageal stenosis needed four covered SEMS. One patient died because of cardiac arrhythmia on the postoperative second day. A tracheoesophageal fistula developed four months after the SEMS implantation in another. All patients improved in oral food intake.
Conclusion: Self expandable esophageal stents are effective palliation methods in patients with malignant dysphagia.
Herein, we report on our experience with a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) and SEPS in a consecutive series of patients with malignant dysphagia due to either esophageal, pulmonary, or gastric carcinoma.
The mean follow-up time ranged from 1 to 39 months (mean 9 months), and currently four patients are still alive and being followed up. The cases included 37 patients with primary esophageal cancer, three with invasive lung cancer, and three others with esophageal invasion stemming from gastric malignancy, and their symptoms were dysphagia (n=43; 100.0%), coughing after the intake of liquid food (n=3; 6.9%), dyspnea (n=1; 2.3%), and chest discomfort (n=1; 2.3%). Furthermore, the stenosis was located in the upper esophagus in two patients (4.6%), the middle esophagus in 22 patients (51.1%), and the lower esophagus in 19 others (44.1%), with three also having fistulous lesions (6.9%) (Figure 1) in the middle esophagus. The histopathological types of cancer were squamous cell carcinoma (n=28; 65.1%), adenocarcinoma (n=12; 27.9%), adenosquamous carcinoma (n=1; 2.3%), small cell carcinoma (n=1; 2.3%) and signet-ring cell carcinoma (n=1; 2.3%), and surgery was not recommended for any of the patients. The criteria for inoperability were the following: distant metastases (n=15; 34.8%), vascular and cardiac invasion (n=5; 11.6%), tracheal invasion (n=2; 4.6%), esophagorespiratory fistulas (n=3; 6.9%), advanced age and poor general health (n=7; 16.2%), an invasion of lung cancer (n=3; 6.9%), and preexistent coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=1; 2.3%). In addition, seven patients decline to have the surgery. The decision for inoperability was established via the use of esophagography, abdominal ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fiberoptic endoscopy, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as well as the patients’ pathology. Seventeen of the patients underwent radiation and chemotherapy, nine only had chemotherapy, and three only had radiation prior to the placement of the stent. A total of 49 self-expandable membrane-covered metallic (Micro- Tech (Nanjing) Company, Nanjing, PRC) stents were inserted in 38 patients while five membrane-covered plastic esophageal stents (Boston Scientific Corp., Marlborough, MA, USA) were used in the other five. The SEMS was used in the 38 patients with stenotic lesions in the middle and lower esophagus, and the SEPS was utilized in the five patients with fistulas and upper esophageal localization. Four of the SEMS were placed in one patient because of restenosis related to tumor overgrowth that appeared several months after previous stent placements, and two SEMS were placed in eight patients for the same reason (Figure 2). A single self-expandable stent was placed in the remaining patients. The stent diameters ranged from 16 to 20 mm, and the length of the stents varied between 6 and 15 cm. Before the stents were implanted, endoscopic balloon dilatation was performed on all of the patients (100%), and a Dumon stent (Novatech SA in France) was inserted in the trachea of one patient with esophageal and tracheal stenosis prior to the implantation of the esophageal stent.
Figure 1: Bronchoscopic view of the bronchoesophageal fistula (arrow).
Figure 2: Radiographic view of two of the self-expandable metal stent.
Table 1: Clinical characteristics of the patients
Palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia is the principle choice of therapy in patients with inoperable esophageal, invasive lung, and gastric cancer. Endoscopic laser therapy, electrocautery, and self-expandable esophageal stents can be used to treat this condition, and out of these, stent placement is the most effective,[11] with both SEMS and SEPS being used in malignant dysphagia patients as well as those with ERFs, which develop in cases of advanced esophageal and lung cancer and lead to pulmonary symptoms as a result of the aspiration of secretions and food.[4,13,14] Turkyilmaz et al.[15] in their series comprised of 326 patients with malignant esophageal disorder found that ERFs were present in 5% (n=18) of their study participants. Covered stents are suitable for the sealing of fistulas because they can prevent the esophageal contents from passing into the fistula. After covered esophageal stent placement, clinical symptoms related to the aspiration usually regress. However, if the esophageal stent did not seal the ERF or if the tracheobronchial system was obstructed because of a primary tumor, a tracheal and/or bronchial stent should then be placed into the airway.
Before stent implantation, an endoscopic radiological examination such as esophagography should be performed, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy may also be necessary for patients with symptoms of aspiration. In addition, dilation is necessary in most patients, but the maximum degree of dilation has not yet been established.[4] However, it is usually advised to dilate to at least 12 mm, but excessive dilatation may cause stent migration.[16,17]
For those who undergo stent implantation, major and minor complications may develop in approximately 2-10% and 20-33% of the patients, respectively,[4,11,18] and Eroglu et al.[19] reported that the overall complication rate without chest pain was 31.7% in their series.
Some of the patients die as a direct result of the procedure, and in the study by Turkyılmaz et al.,[20] they reported a stent-related mortality rate of 2.3%. Perforation, chest pain, aspiration, and minor bleeding are the most common early complications[11] while stent migration, tumor overgrowth, persistent reflux, recurrent dysphagia, fatal bleeding, perforation, and tracheoesophageal fistulas are seen later.[11] Furthermore, stent obstruction may occur due to tumor progression and food impaction.[11] Moreover, tumor progression may occur in 4-18% of the cases of stent implantation.[21]
The incidence of stent migration is higher with covered stents (23%) than with uncovered stents 8.7%,[22] but stent removal is only indicated for symptomatic patients.[23] In cases of stent implantation at the upper and middle third of the esophagus, fistula formation and tracheal compression is possible, and bleeding and perforation may develop due to pressure necrosis on the tumor or the esophageal wall.[11]
A success rate of between 86-100% has been reported for the improvement of dysphagia,[24,25] but in our series, the rate was 100% for this and stent implantation. Furthermore, the major and minor complication rates were 4.6% and 30.2%, respectively. The minor complications that we identified were stent migration into the stomach, minimal hemorrhage during the operation, and retrosternal pain which occurred in two (4.6%), 13 (30.2%), and 10 (23.2%) patients, respectively. Migrations were seen in patients with upper esophageal stenosis, and the stents were replaced in these cases. However, our replacement ratio was 4.6% and this ratio was lower than in other reports because the dilatation was performed at a maximum of 12 mm.[25] We also removed one stent via a laparotomy because the patient had symptoms of abdominal pain and nausea. When minimal hemorrhage occurred, no treatment was needed, but retrosternal pain was treated with parenteral analgesics. Furthermore, the early mortality rate within the first 30 days in our study was 2.3%, and this rate was acceptable when compared with other studies in the literature.[22,26]
The most common late complication was stent obstruction due to tumor overgrowth (n=9, 20.9%), and this rate was to similar to that found in the literature.[21] However, no food impaction was seen in the stent because we advised our patients to eat semisolid and liquid foods. There was also no gastroesphageal reflux related to the stent because they contain an anti-reflux mechanism consisting of a plastic valve system in the distal portion of the SEMS which prevented any reflux. In addition, we saw no signs of perforation or aspiration, and there was minimal hemorrhage in 13 patients during the operation. In spite of these issues, the success rates for the stent implantation procedure and for improvement in the dysphagia were both 100%.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with
respect to the authorship and/or publication of this
article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Munoz JC. Esophageal stenting in patients with advanced
esophageal cancer. Northeast Florida Medicine 2010;61:33-8.
2) Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J. Estimates of the
worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer
1999;83:18-29.
3) Jiang XJ, Song MQ, Xin YN, Gao YQ, Niu ZY, Tian ZB.
Endoscopic stenting and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for
advanced esophageal cancer: a case-control study. World J
Gastroenterol 2012;18:1404-9.
4) Felix VN, Caetano A, Cipullo JP, Almodova EC, Colaiacovo
W, Zamboti AF. Mid-esophagus unresectable cancer treated
with a low cost stent. First experience. BMC Res Notes
2011;4:486.
5) Weigel TL, Frumiento C, Gaumintz E. Endoluminal
palliation for dysphagia secondary to esophageal carcinoma.
Surg Clin North Am 2002;82:747-61.
6) Shridhar R, Almhanna K, Meredith KL, Biagioli MC,
Chuong MD, Cruz A, et al. Radiation therapy and esophageal
cancer. Cancer Control 2013;20:97-110.
7) Laquière A, Grandval P, Heresbach D, Prat F, Arpurt JP,
Bichard P, et al. Self-expanding plastic stent removed after
radiochemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Dis
Esophagus 2014;27:176-81.
8) Celestin LR. Permanent intubation in inoperable cancer of
the oesophagus and cardia: a new tube. Ann R Coll Surg
Engl 1959;25:165-70.
9) Atkinson M, Ferguson R. Fibreoptic endoscopic palliative
intubation of inoperable oesophagogastric neoplasms. Br
Med J 1977;1:266-7.
10) Frimberger E. Expanding spiral--a new type of prosthesis for
the palliative treatment of malignant esophageal stenoses.
Endoscopy 1983;15 Suppl 1:213-4.
11) Baron TH. Expandable metal stents for the treatment of
cancerous obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. N Engl J
Med 2001;344:1681-7.
12) Maroju NK, Anbalagan P, Kate V, Ananthakrishnan N.
Improvement in dysphagia and quality of life with selfexpanding
metallic stents in malignant esophageal strictures.
Indian J Gastroenterol 2006;25:62-5.
13) Raijman I, Siddique I, Ajani J, Lynch P. Palliation of
malignant dysphagia and fistulae with coated expandable
metal stents: experience with 101 patients. Gastrointest
Endosc 1998;48:172-9.
14) Rahmani EY, Rex DK, Lehman GA. Z-stent for malignant
esophageal obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am
1999;9:395-402.
15) Turkyilmaz A, Aydin Y, Eroglu A, Bilen Y, Karaoglanoglu
N. Palliative management of esophagorespiratory fistula in
esophageal malignancy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan
Tech 2009;19:364-7.
16) Sagar PM, Gauperaa T, Sue-Ling H, McMahon MJ, Johnston
D. An audit of the treatment of cancer of the oesophagus. Gut
1994;35:941-5.
17) Knyrim K, Wagner HJ, Bethge N, Keymling M, Vakil N. A
controlled trial of an expansile metal stent for palliation of
esophageal obstruction due to inoperable cancer. N Engl J
Med 1993;329:1302-7.
18) Keller R, Flieger D, Fischbach W, Christl SU. Self-expanding
metal stents for malignant esophagogastric obstruction:
experience with a new design covered nitinol stent. J
Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2007;16:239-43.
19) Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, Subasi M, Karaoglanoglu N.
The use of self-expandable metallic stents for palliative
treatment of inoperable esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus
2010;23:64-70.
20) Turkyilmaz A, Eroglu A, Aydin Y, Kurt A, Bilen Y,
Karaoglanoglu N. Complications of metallic stent placement
in malignant esophageal stricture and their management.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010;20:10-5.
21) Lowe AS, Sheridan MB. Esophageal stenting. Semin
Intervent Radiol 2004;21:157-66.
22) Roseveare CD, Patel P, Simmonds N, Goggin PM, Kimble J,
Shepherd HA. Metal stents improve dysphagia, nutrition and
survival in malignant oesophageal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial comparing modified Gianturco Z-stents
with plastic Atkinson tubes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
1998;10:653-7.
23) White RE, Mungatana C, Topazian M. Expandable stents
for iatrogenic perforation of esophageal malignancies. J
Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:715-9.
24) Elphick DA, Smith BA, Bagshaw J, Riley SA. Self-expanding
metal stents in the palliation of malignant dysphagia: outcome
analysis in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Esophagus 2005;18:93-5.