Since the distance between the LSA and transection line (3 mm) was not safe enough to place a stent graft, we hypothesized that the origin of the LSA was occluded. A decision regarding additional endovascular or surgical reconstruction approaches for the LSA was postponed after the angiographic assessment of the vertebrobasilary system. The patient then completed the consent form and was taken to the angiography unit.
Right femoral access was obtained via open surgical cutdown under general anesthesia, and the left brachial and femoral arteries were cannulated with ultrasonographic guidance. The angiography of both vertebral arteries showed that the V4 segment of the right vertebral artery was hypoplastic but that it still had communication with the basilar artery. The left vertebral artery was dominant, and the right vertebral artery by itself was not considered to be sufficient to supply blood for posterior cerebral circulation and the left arm (Figure 2). Therefore, we decided to place a periscope graft inside the LSA instead of a chimney graft to avoid a potential type IA endoleak since the left carotid and subclavian arteries were in very close proximity (8 mm).
A 5-French pigtail catheter was then advanced upwards to the ascending aorta via the left brachial artery, and a 9x150 mm Gore® Viabahn® endoprosthesis (WL Gore and Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA) was advanced over an Amplatz guidewire (Boston Scientific., Heredia, Costa Rica) into the LSA just proximal to the left vertebral artery via the left femoral artery. Subsequently, a 26x135 mm thoracic stent graft (Cook Medical, Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) was advanced toward the arcus aorta over a Lunderquist guidewire (Cook Medical, Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) via the right femoral artery (Figure 3). The thoracic stent graft was released just distal to the left common carotid artery (CCA). As a final step, balloon dilatation was performed on the periscope graft simultaneously with the aortic stent graft after the periscope graft was released.
Postoperative angiography confirmed that the LSA and left vertebral artery flow was being maintained by the periscope graft in a retrograde fashion without any endoleaks (Figure 4). After an uneventful one-night intensive care unit follow-up, the patient was taken to the cardiovascular surgery ward. She was discharged on the third postoperative day and was prescribed 300 mg acetylsalicylic acid because of lacerations in the pancreas and left kidney. The postoperative third-day and third- month CT angiographies revealed a patent aortic stent graft together with a patent periscope graft without any endoleaks.
In cases of blunt thoracic trauma, it should be kept in mind that vascular injuries may have occurred, and the presence of mediastinal expansion, evanescence of the aortic contour, or tracheal deviation on chest roentgenography should be looked upon as suspicious. In these instances, the sensitivity and specificity of thoracic CT, including the arterial phase, for diagnosis is almost 100%.[4] Furthermore, transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography as well as digital subtraction angiography may also be helpful for diagnosing this condition. Treatment alternatives for blunt thoracic trauma include surgical and endovascular interventions.
Endovascular aortic repair requires a minimum of a 20 mm safe landing zone. In cases in which the aortic isthmus injury is closer to the LSA, as in our case, the LSA orifice should be covered and the endograft should then be placed just distal to the left CCA. In patients who undergo LSA coverage during the thoracic endovascular aortic procedure, Lee et al.[2] determined that 6% have arm ischemia, 4% have spinal cord ischemia, and 2% have vertebrobasilar ischemia while 5% of these patients suffer a stroke due to anterior cerebral circulation and 6% do not survive. In order to reduce these risks, a complete evaluation of the vertebrobasilar system should initially be performed, and if necessary, additional surgical revascularization procedures should be carried out. Surgical options include a carotid-subclavian bypass graft, subclavian-carotid transposition, a carotidcarotid bypass, a subclavian-subclavian bypass, or an axillo-axillary bypass graft. Kukucer et al.[5] reported that the 10-year patency rates for these procedures can reach as high as 95%. Recently, the chimney and periscope techniques have been introduced as alternatives to extra-anatomical bypass surgery in order to protect the supra-aortic branches.[2] The main problem with these two endovascular techniques is that their long-term durability has not been clearly determined.
Although no consensus exists regarding the successful application of the chimney technique in the literature, it has been suggested that there should at least be a 10-15 mm distance between the target vessels. In a recent study by Moulakakis et al.[6] that analyzed reports that have focused on chimney graft applications for the supra-aortic branches, they found a total endoleak rate of 18.5% (type I endoleak 10.5%; type II endoleak 8%). In addition, they also noted that there was a technical success rate of 99.2%, a perioperative mortality rate of 4.8%, and a stroke rate 4%.
In selected patients with an insufficient distance between the left CCA and LSA, the periscope graft technique can be used instead of the chimney graft procedure to decrease the risk of a type I endoleak[7] since this is a particularly undesired complication, especially in cases in which a ruptured aortic transection is needed. Therefore any endovascular technique that might ensure the possibility of minimal endoleaks is of vital importance. With this goal in mind, we chose the periscope graft technique for our patient instead of the chimney procedure and obtained successful technical and clinical results. Similarly, Lachat et al.[7] recently achieved positive results using the same technique to maintain LSA flow during endovascular aortic repair in 14 consecutive high-risk patients, including two with traumatic aortic ruptures.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with
respect to the authorship and/or publication of this
article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Razzouk AJ, Gundry SR, Wang N, del Rio MJ, Varnell D,
Bailey LL. Repair of traumatic aortic rupture: a 25-year
experience. Arch Surg 2000;135:913-8.
2) Lee KN, Lee HC, Park JS, Kim BW, Cha KS, Kim SP, et al.
The modified chimney technique with a thoracic aortic stent
graft to preserve the blood flow of the left common carotid
artery for treating descending thoracic aortic aneurysm and
dissection.Korean Circ J 2012;42:360-5.
3) Feczko JD, Lynch L, Pless JE, Clark MA, McClain J, Hawley
DA. An autopsy case review of 142 nonpenetrating (blunt)
injuries of the aorta. J Trauma 1992;33:846-9.
4) Agee CK, Metzler MH, Churchill RJ, Mitchell FL. Computed tomographic evaluation to exclude traumatic
aortic disruption. J Trauma 1992;33:876-81.
5) Kucuker A, Hidiroglu M, Cetin L, Kunt A, Saglam F,
Bayram H, et al. The results of carotid-subclavian bypass in
a single institute. Damar Cer Derg 2013;22:285-91.