Methods: Between March 2007 and June 2010, 12 patients (9 males, 3 females; mean age 23.4±6.6 years; range 16 to 40 years) who underwent surgery for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. Eleven patients had unilateral and one patient had bilateral popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Of all patients, eight had type 2 disease, while the remaining patients had type 3 disease. Physical examination revealed non-palpable pulses. The Ankle-Brachial indices of the affected extremity varied between 0.30 to 0.46. The diagnosis was based on magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography.
Results: The flow of distal popliteal artery was evaluated by the manual Doppler ultrasonography and pulsatile flow was detected. Postoperative ankle-brachial indices of patients were measured between 0.90 to 0.97 values in all patients. The patients were scheduled for the outpatient clinic at one and three months after discharge for magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography angiography examinations. The results were normal, which indicated that femoro-popliteal artery bypass grafts were patent and popliteal artery lumens at the thrombectomy sites were open. Ischemic ulcers were completely healed. There was no in-hospital mortality.
Conclusion: Our study results suggest that popliteal artery entrapment syndrome should be kept in mind in young patients with complaint of claudication and a detailed vascular examination is of utmost importance for the differential diagnosis and treatment plan in this patient population.
In this study, we aimed to present our experiences on patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of PAES.
During the follow-up postoperative vital signs of the patients were stable and the patients were discharged with anticoagulant treatment (warfarin) to attain an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2-2.5. At three months, warfarin was discontinued and the patients received antiaggregant therapy (100 mg/day N-acetyl salicylic acid).
The patients were called for the outpatient clinic after discharge at one and three months to perform MRA or CTA. The results were normal, which indicated that femoropopliteal artery bypass grafts were patent, and popliteal artery lumens at the thrombectomy sites were open. Ischemic ulcers were completely healed in all patients. There was no in-hospital mortality.
Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome usually affects males younger than 30 years of age with a male to female ratio of 15:1 (male predilection).[8] Although bilateral popliteal arterial occlusion secondary to PAES is rare, PAES can be seen bilaterally in 25% of cases.[8] On the other hand, there are only a few reports on patients with bilateral PAES in the literature. Yavas et al.[9] reported one bilateral PAES patient with type 2 in their study.
In addition, Ivaki et al.[10] reported that a rare case of bilateral PAES who presented with the same symptom 11 years after his first experience of PAES of his left leg. In consistent with the literature, the number of male patients was more than female ones and the mean age of our patients was 23.4±6.6 years in our study. Also, we detected bilateral involvement in one patient (8.3%) who had type 2 PAES. As a result, patients with unilateral PAES should be carefully monitored for PAES on the controlateral side.[10] Also, there are some studies which reported familial PAES,[11] although none of our patients had this pathology. Similarly, Murray et al.[12] reported that PAES is an uncommon cause of peripheral vascular disease in young and normal weighted individuals, presenting as progressive claudication or sudden limb ischaemia and it may also present later in life with insidious symptoms relating to popliteal thrombosis or aneurysm. Claudicatio intermittens, coldness of toes, leg pain during exercise, and ischemic ulcers were remarkable in our patients. However, none of our patients suffered from sudden limb ischemia.
Furthermore, PAES be classified into six types according to the relation of popliteal artery base with surrounding structures.[5] Collins et al.[13] reported that incidences of type 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 PAES were as 5%, 32%, 26%, 37% and 0%, respectively. However, most of our patients had type 2 PAES.
The most common risk factors of peripheral arterial disases were DM, dyslipidemia, smoking, and HT in our study population (Table 2). The patients with DM had well-regulated glucose levels thanks to oral antidiabetic drugs. Drug therapy was started in patients with dyslipidemia and/or hypertension. Smoking an average of one pack of cigarettes per day for two to five years was identified in our smoker patients. However, we did not found any findings relating to chronic obliterative peripheral arterial disease with MRA or CTA in any patients.
Sinha et al.[14] reported that diagnosis and appropriate management of PAES were complicated by several factors: mainly its actual prevalence is unknown and the condition is rare. On the other hand, we believe that early diagnosis and accurate treatment can be established by using detailed vascular examination, medical history, and appropriate imaging studies.
Chronic compartment syndrome, medial tibial syndrome and PAES may cause claudication in young individuals.[15] Furthermore, the most significant clinical manifestation of PAES is limited walking distance in young patients who do not have any risk factors for atherosclerosis.[16] In a study, physical examination findings of the patients were found to be non-specific.[8] Also, Almeida et al.[5] reported that on physical examination, patients without thrombotic complications have normal pulses at rest. Otherwise, De Oliveira et al.[17] reported that a 20-year-old man with bilateral PAES was admitted to their medical service and was operated after the examination. The physical examination also produced normal findings, except the absence of right tibial pulses and decreased tibial pulses in his left leg in plantar flexion.
In another study, Tercan et al.[18] pointed out that the absence of foot pulses during passive dorsiflexion and active plantar flexion was characteristic. In addition, most patients, similar to our patient population, are diagnosed years after the initiation of symptoms and complications have already developed at the time of diagnosis. The main complaint of our patients was claudicatio intermittens with nonpalpable popliteal and distal arterial pulses. Extrinsic arterial compression of popliteal artery in PAES may cause chronic vascular micro-injuries and thrombus formation results in distal ischemia of the affected limb.[6,19] Early detection of PAES is important to prevent its progression.[10] However, diagnostic delay is common, as it usually occurs in young and athletic patients, in particular. The diagnosis and the graduation of both severity of dynamic circulatory insufficiency and arterial damage are usually made by CTA,[6] CT[20] or MR[20,21] and MRA.[21]
These radiological imaging studies can express the precise anatomical relations of muscle, bone, and the artery, as well as the degree of stenosis or occlusion of the popliteal artery.[19] Also, these imaging methods become more widespread in the diagnosis of popliteal artery disease.[3] In our study, we accurately diagnosed PAES after physical examination using MRA or CTA. The main goal of the treatment is surgical creation of normal anatomy within the popliteal fossa.[22] Also, Tercan et al.[18] suggested that PAES should be treated by surgery, regardless of the degree of symptoms.
Surgical treatment of PAES includes releasing of the vessel by extracting the muscle which causes entrapment and reconstruction of narrow lumen of the popliteal artery by endarterectomy or bypass grafting.[6] When PAES is detected early as the popliteal artery is intact, treatment of choice is to divide the abnormal muscle or fibrous tissue is required.[8] Furthermore, if the diagnosis is made after the popliteal artery is occluded or stenotic, the treatment of choice is vascular reconstruction by endarterectomy or bypass grafting in addition to the division of the anomalous musculotendinous structures.[8]
On the other hand, endovascular treatment such as percutaneous catheter directed with or without balloon angioplasty was another treatment modality. However, there were some studies suggesting that endovascular treatment was not effective without removing underlying reason of vessel entrapment, in which the risk of re-occlusion was high.[6,18] Also, Kwon[23] reported that endovascular stent application to the popliteal artery in a patient with PAES resulted in occlusion one year after the stent placement, and was treated with surgical bypass graft by reversed saphenous vein. Otherwise, treatment of the occlusion of popliteal artery in patients with PAES by angioplasty may be a feasible approach after exclusion of the factors which causes entrapment.[18]
In the present study, we performed surgical intervention, as they were ineligible for endovascular treatment modalities. During the operation, we detected compression of the popliteal artery in all patients. Furthermore, thrombus and complete occlusion were found in the popliteal artery in eight and four patients, respectively. We excised abnormal head or accessory muscle bundle of the gastrocnemius muscle in eight patients and thrombectomy was performed in these patients; however, femoropopliteal artery bypass using the same side saphenous vein graft was performed in other patients. In the scheduled visits, femoropopliteal artery bypass grafts were patent and popliteal artery lumens at the thrombectomy sites were open.
However, our study has some limitations. First, this study was a retrospective study. Second, we had a small sample size and many patients with various types of PAES were excluded. However, we suggest that PAES may be missed during the diagnosis and, therefore, mistreatment may lead to undesired complications of PAES. Also, we believe that the correct diagnosis of the etiology of claudication is of utmost importance to avoid unnecessary medical, endovascular, or surgical treatments.
In conclusion, popliteal artery entrapment syndrome is a relatively rare, but potentially limb-threatening disease, which is predominantly seen in younger population. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome should be kept in mind in young patients with a complaint of claudication and a detailed vascular examination is essential in the differential diagnosis and treatment plan.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with
respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Gencpinar T, Albayrak G, Gulcu A, Catalyurek H. A
case report on popliteal entrapment syndrome of a child.
CausaPedia 2013;2:503-8.
2) Ohta M, Kusaba A, Shrestha DR, Koja K, Kina M, Shiroma
H, et al. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Report of two
cases. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1991;32:697-701.
3) Gumustas S, Çakir O, Ciftci E, Yavuz S, Kanko M, Sarisoy
HT, et al. Angiographic findings in popliteal artery diseases.
Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2012;20:56-64.
4) Gibson MH, Mills JG, Johnson GE, Downs AR. Popliteal
entrapment syndrome. Ann Surg 1977;185:341-8.
5) Almeida MJ, Yoshida WB, Melo NR. Popliteal artery
entrapment syndrome. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc
2003;10:199-206. [Abstract]
6) Papaioannou S, Tsitouridis K, Giataganas G, Rodokalakis G,
Kyriakou V, Papastergiou Ch, et al. Evaluation of popliteal
arteries with CT angiography in popliteal artery entrapment
syndrome. Hippokratia 2009;13:32-7.
7) Sirasanagandla SR, Potu BK, Nayak B S, Bhat KMR.
Popliteal vessels entrapment by a variant accessory belly of
medial head of gastrocnemius. Anatom Physiol 2013;3:116.
8) Roche-Nagle G, Wong KT, Oreopoulos G. Vascular
claudication in a young patient: popliteal entrapment
syndrome. Hong Kong Med J 2009;15:388-90.
9) Yavas D, Uzun Z, Ozcan F. Popliteal entrapment syndrome.
GKD Cer Derg 1992;1:207-10.
10) Iwaki R, Ozaki N, Tanaka Y, Wakita N. Bilateral popliteal
artery entrapment syndrome with asynchronous onset.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011;13:429-31.
11) Al-Basheer M, Hadadin F, Al Zoubi O, Quaran Z. Familial
popliteal entrapment syndrome: a case report. JRMS
2003;10:63-5.
12) Murray A, Halliday M, Croft RJ. Popliteal artery entrapment
syndrome. Br J Surg 1991;78:1414-9.
13) Collins PS, McDonald PT, Lim RC. Popliteal artery
entrapment: an evolving syndrome. J Vasc Surg 1989;10:484-9.
14) Sinha S, Houghton J, Holt PJ, Thompson MM, Loftus IM,
Hinchliffe RJ. Popliteal entrapment syndrome. J Vasc Surg
2012;55:252-262.
15) Aslim E, Akay HT, Korun O, Akgün RC. Type 2 popliteal
artery entrapment syndrome: a case report. Turk Gogus Kalp
Dama 2012;20:910-2.
16) Schweizer M, Hügli R, Koella C, Jeanneret C. Popliteal
entrapment syndrome and age. Vasa 2012;41:262-8.
17) De Oliveira FM, Santos ACB, Takito AM, Bolanho E, da
Costa RF, Fernandes N. Bilateral popliteal artery entrapment
syndrome: case report. J Vasc Bras 2008;2:159-62.
18) Tercan F, Oğuzkurt L, Kizilkiliç O, Yeniocak A, Gülcan O.
Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Diagn Interv Radiol
2005;11:222-4.
19) Mark LK, Kiselow MC, Wagner M, Goodman JJ. Popliteal
artery entrapment syndrome. JAMA 1978;240:465-6.
20) Kim HK, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH, Hong HJ. Popliteal
artery entrapment syndrome: morphological classification
utilizing MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35:648-58.
21) Atilla S, Ilgit ET, Akpek S, Yücel C, Tali ET, Işik S. MR
imaging and MR angiography in popliteal artery entrapment
syndrome. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1025-9.