Herein, we report a case of posterior penetrating stab injury in the thoracic region, which was managed with a multidisciplinary stepwise approach with teams of both neurosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. The neurosurgical intervention was performed under the guidance of thoracoscopy in the same session to maintain a safe and minimally invasive approach.
Figure 2: Synchronous dual intervention including open laminectomy and thoracoscopy was performed.
One of the striking clinical features of this patient from the physiological perspective that should be discussed in addition to the surgical management and intervention was her clinical status and neurological examination. There have been reports in the literature of such cases where there has been no motor dysfunction after the stabbing.[5] According to accepted physiological knowledge, no motor dysfunction in the lower extremities is not surprising. In the current study, there was no motor dysfunction as the blade was dissecting the vertical fibers which are responsible for motor function in the lower extremities. In addition, the sensorial complaints and neurological signs of the patient were beyond the cutting sensorial fibers with a horizontal course (Figure 3).
Although chest tube insertion remains the basis of treatment in the majority of patients with chest trauma, it may be insufficient in certain cases. Thoracoscopy has great advantages as a minimally invasive diagnostic or therapeutic tool, which allows complete inspection of the thoracic cavity. Thoracoscopy is also associated with a reduced need for analgesics, better mobility, reduced wound and pulmonary complications, faster rehabilitation, and reduced length of hospital stay.[6] H owever, t horacoscopic evaluation i s n ot t o b e recommended for patients with indications for emergent thoracotomy or sternotomy with hemodynamic instability, suspected great vessels or cardiac injury.
In summary, in cases of penetrating spinal cord injuries with unexpected vascular or organ injury, not only the neurosurgeons, but also the thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons should be interested with this complicated clinical situation. Multidisciplinary management with sharing responsibility and keeping up the team spirit is the safest mainstay of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Thoracoscopy may be considered as a surgeon-friendly minimally invasive guide for the management of selected patients with penetrating spinal cord injuries towards the thoracic region.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to
the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.
1) Peacock WJ, Shrosbree RD, Key AG. A review of 450
stabwounds of the spinal cord. S Afr Med J 1977;51:961-4.
2) Demetriades D. Penetrating injuries to the thoracic great
vessels. J Card Surg 1997;12(2 Suppl):173-9.
3) Venger BH, Simpson RK, Narayan RK. Neurosurgical
intervention in penetrating spinal trauma with associated
visceral injury. J Neurosurg 1989;70:514-8.
4) Shahlaie K, Chang DJ, Anderson JT. Nonmissile penetrating
spinal injury. Case report and review of the literature. J
Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:400-8.