Due to atrioventricular (AV) discordance and ventriculoarterial (VA) discordance systemic ventricular dysfunction of the morphologic right ventricle (MRV) structure and systemic AV valve (tricuspid) insufficiency after physiologic corrective surgeries are conditions anticipated during the late stage.[1,3-7]
Double switch operations have been developed with the aim of providing anatomic repair in cases with congenitally cTGA. The aimed of double switch operations is to convert morphological left ventricular (MLV) into systemic ventricle and MRV into pulmonic ventricle. By so doing, it is envisaged that the cardiac functions would be secured and life expectancy prolonged.[1,2,7-20]
About 50-70% of patients with congenital cTGA are reported to have wide ventricular septal defect (VSD), whereas approximately 50% have pulmonary stenosis (valvular, subvalvular stenosis or pulmonary atresia). Atrial situs inversus (ASI) in approximately 5% of patients, and dextrocardia or mesocardia in 20% may also be encountered in these patients. Ebstein-like malformation on systemic AV valve and an associated systemic AV valve insufficiency are also observed in a good number of patients.[1,7] The pathophysiology, symptomatology and clinical findings of the patients are dependent on the presence and the type of additional anomalies. The indication, timing and the shape of surgery to be performed is usually determined by additional anomalies.
DOUBLE SWITCH OPERATIONS
Anatomic corrective surgeries in congenital cTGA,
started becoming common place at the beginning of
the 1990s due to adverse outcomes observed during
the late stage, as a result of physiologic corrective
surgery.[2,8,11]
Atrial switch - Arterial switch
Anatomic repair can be achieved by closing the
VSD and applying an atrial switch and an arterial
switch in congenital cTGA patients with VSD who
have normal pulmonary outflow tract and pulmonary
valve.[2,9-15] Atrial switch can be performed by either
the Senning or Mustard procedure. We prefer the
Senning procedure, since we consider it is easier in
terms of intracardiac geometry and architecture, and
superior in terms of obstruction of venous return and
the incidence of arrhythmia.[12,13] We usually perform
interatrial re-septation and roofing of pulmonary
venous atrium with autologous pericardial patch repair.
While creating the systemic venous neo-atrium, the
opening to the AV (tricuspid) valve should be at least as
large as the tricuspid valve diameter, during direction
of the superior vena cava (SVC) and inferior vena cava
(IVC) to the MRV (pulmonic ventricle). For this to be
achieved, it may be useful to resect the limbus fossa
ovalis at the entrance to the SVC and a cut-back to
the coronary sinus leaving it into the systemic venous
atrium. The pulmonary venous chamber outlet should
be at least as large as the systemic AV (mitral) valve
diameter when directed to the MLV. For this to be
achieved, it would be useful to use a pericardial patch
repair while extending the interatrial groove incision
towards the right upper pulmonary vein and forming the lateral-anterior wall of the pulmonary venous
atrium (Figure 1). Special care should be taken not to
constrict the normal diameters of the vena cavae by
weakening the grip of tourniquet while passing over
SVC and IVC. Our experience shows that the presence
of ASI and dextrocardia or mesocardia is not an
impediment to the Senning operation.[12,13]
The VSD is closed relatively easily with single supported stitches through the mitral valve, with the Dacron or Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch. When closing the VSD, it should be kept in mind that the anterior AV node and the subsequent His conduction system passes antero-superiorly through the pulmonary annulus and the VSD, and move on the septal surface of the MLV. As a result, it is extremely important to place the sutures from the septal surface of the MRV along the antero-superior rim of the VSD in order to avoid AV block (Figure 2). In patients with sufficiently wide aortic annulus, VSD can also be closed through the aorta. This approach may be safer in terms of protecting the conduction system.
In these time consuming and highly complicated surgeries, we prefer to first carry out the coronary translocation step, which is an important part of arterial switch. Arterial switch is performed using the same technique as in the classical transposition of great arteries (TGA). In cases with congenital cTGA, some minor modifications should be taken into consideration during translocation of coronary arteries. To avoid tension, twisting and torsion, it may be necessary to prepare coronary buttons as wide as possible, and especially to mobilize the RCA, while sacrificing some small side branches (Figure 3).[9,11-15] After the translocation of the coronary arteries, we close the VSD and then complete the Senning procedure. Reconstruction of the neo-aorta and neo-pulmonary artery is the last stage of the proceeure. In some cases where the aorta and pulmonary artery are situated side by side, reconstruction of the neo-pulmonary artery without the Lecompte maneuver may be more appropriate with regards to avoid tension and torsion in the pulmonary arteries and absence of pressure on the coronary arteries.
Atrial switch - Ventriculo-arterial switch
(Rastelli)
Patients with congenital cTGA who have pulmonary
stenosis together with VSD can undergo anatomical
correction with Senning - Rastelli procedure type double
switch procedure.[1,8,12-15] In patients with congenital
cTGA, VSD is usually large, perimembranous, and
has a sub-pulmonic and inlet extension, as seen
from MLV. This VSD appears to be located in the
subaortic conotruncal region, when viewed from the
morphological right ventricle. In the first stage of
the surgical operation, the MRV is accessed with
an incision on the subaortic region and the MLV is directed to the aorta with the help of intraventricular
tunnel through the VSD. This intraventricular tunnel
should be placed geometrically with convexity into
the MRV, so as not to create any obstruction between
the VSD and the aorta (Figure 4a). Since the AV
conduction system running on the MLV septal surface,
a safer condition is considered with regards to the
conduction system while creating intraventricular
tunnel. It is easy to create intracardiac tunnel with
single pledgetted sutures placing through the septal
leaflet of the systemic AV valve. The second step
involves application of the atrial switch (Senning) as
described above. During the final stage, the pulmonary
artery is closed from the ventricular outlet and the
MRV-pulmonary artery continuity is provided by an
extracardiac conduit (pulmonary homograft or bovine
jugular vein [Contegra, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis,
MN]) (Figure 4b).[9,12-15]
Senning-Bex-Nikaidoh Procedure
The Senning-Bex-Nikaidoh procedure is another
anatomical correction approach in congenital cTGA
patients with concomitant pulmonary stenosis, and
particularly restrictive VSD. This procedure has
recently been introduced and performed rarely. It
is the combination of Senning procedure and the
translocation of the aortic root to the MLV outflow
(reverse Ross procedure).[9,15] The main advantage of
this approach is that the aortic outflow is made more
straight, short and natural. In addition interventricular septum is easily reconstructed under direct vision, and
the MRV-pulmonary artery conduit can be inserted
in the orthotopic position away from the sternal
compression. However, the division of the outlet
septum for the aorta to be translocated to the MLV
outlet may result in damage to conduction system
which is running through pulmonary annulus and
VSD anteriorly. As a result, aortic translocation should
be considered in patients who are not anatomically
suitable for intracardiac tunnelling.[15] It should be
noted that problems and difficulties may also be
encountered in coronary transfers in patients with
contralateral aortic translocation.
Another alternative, similar to aortic translocation, is the pulmonary translocation approach. With this procedure, the pulmonary annulus is excised from the MLV alongside the muscular subpulmonary surrounding tissue. The VSD is enlarged by posterior division of the outlet septum, taking into account the anterior conduction system. The interventricular defect is repaired with patch, leaving the aorta to the MLV. The defect on MLV roof formed by pulmonary root removal is reconstructed with autologous pericardial patch. By so doing, a direct communication between the MLV and aorta is achieved. Reconstruction of the new right ventricular outflow tract is completed by anastomosing the pulmonary artery to MRV infundibulum. In the meantime, pulmonary annularvalvular stenosis can be enlarged with pericardial monocusped patch. The double switch procedure is then completed with the Senning procedure. There is a need for more time to make an assessment of such approaches, since it has been implemented in only a few cases as described by Da Silva.[16]
INDICATION AND TIMING
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and congestive heart
failure are indications for surgery in congenital cTGA
patients with VSD who have normal pulmonary outflow
tract. These patients undergo anatomical correction
together with Senning procedure and arterial switch
by closing the VSD. For this to be achieved, there
should be two balanced ventricles and the MLV/MRV
pressure ratios must be greater than 0.8. We generally
prefer to perform double switch operations with babies
of 3-6 months old. However, it can also be performed
during the earlier infancy period if necessary. In older
children, care should be taken with regards to cases
of inoperability due to irreversible PH and pulmonary
vascular disease.
In congenital cTGA patients with VSD and pulmonary stenosis or pulmonary atresia, we prefer a Senning-Rastelli type double switch operation. For this approach, the location and the size of VSD should be appropriate for the intracardiac tunnel, there should be two proportional and adequately sized ventricles, and the pulmonary vascular structure should be well developed. Since the morphological right ventricular-pulmonary artery continuity would require an extracardiac conduit, it is usually more convenient to implant a larger diameter conduit when the operation is performed after the age of three.[1,8,12,13] When hypoxia and cyanosis are evident in younger infants (AO2 saturation <80%), the Senning-Rastelli double switch repair can be performed with a small diameter conduit or systemic to pulmonary shunt can be preferred for palliation. The Senning-Bex- Nikaidoh procedure may be considered as an option in the patients with concomitant pulmonary stenosis and restrictive VSD.
Overriding-straddling of atrioventricular valves and hypoplasia of one of the ventricles constitute the main contraindication for double switch operations. In patients with single ventricular pathology and pulmonary stenosis, systemic to pulmonary shunt operation is performed before the age of six months. Following shunt operation, bidirectional cavapulmonary anastomosis and Fontan type univentricular repair approaches are applied when needed. In the absence of pulmonary stenosis, pulmonary banding is performed during the neonatal period, followed by the single ventricular repair steps.
OPERATIVE STRATEGY
Standard cardiopulmonary bypass is initiated with
median sternotomy, direct cannulation of SVC
and IVC, and distal aortic cannulation. We prefer
isothermic intermittent blood cardioplegia with
26-28˚C systemic hypothermia and intermittent low
flow cardiopulmonary bypass to provide a better
view. In the Senning-arterial switch procedure, we
first complete the coronary translocation step of
the arterial switch, while in the Senning-Rastelli
procedure we first complete the intraventricular tunnel
followed by the Senning procedure. Transesophageal
echocardiography (TEE) and cerebral O2 saturation
monitoring (NIRS) should be routinely performed in
the operating room. Cell saver, apheresis thrombocyte,
surgical adhesives, hemofiltration and extracorporeal
membrane oxygenation (ECMO) should be made
available in the operating room. It is advisable to
use an adhesion barrier or pericardial substitute
with regards to possibility of reoperations. It is more
appropriate to postpone closing the sternum for 24 to
48 hours postoperatively for the patients with unstable
hemodynamic status.
We routinely use nitric oxide, deep sedation and keep the patient under mild respiratory alkalosis to prevent pulmonary hypertensive crises in patients undergoing an atrial and arterial switch operation with VSD and PH for the first postoperative 48-72 hours. Continuous monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure by placing a pulmonary artery catheter is important with regards to the prevention and management of pulmonary hypertensive crisis, particularly when weaning for extubation.
In general, it may be necessary to keep patients under sedation for 24-48 hours, maintaining moderate dose inotropic (milrinone + dopamine/ adrenaline) support. Aspirin and low molecular weight heparin treatment is continued for 7-10 days starting from the first postoperative day and the treatment protocol is continued with aspirin and/or clopidogrel.
Sample cases
1. Senning-Arterial switch: A 17-month-old
boy with congestive heart failure. The patient was
diagnosed with ASI, congenital cTGA, VSD and PH
by echocardiography. The diagnosis was confirmed
by angiocardiography and catheterization. The VSD
was perimembranous, subpulmonic and with inlet
extension. There was severe left to right shunt; (QP/
QS:3.5). The pulmonary outflow tract and pulmonary
valve were found to be normal. The MRV and MLV
were well developed. Morphological left ventricular
and pulmonary artery pressures were at a systemic
level. The usual inverted coronary arterial structure
was present.
Anatomical correction by Senning procedure and arterial switch was performed (This is the first patient in Turkey undergone double switch operation, July 20, 1995). The VSD was transatrially closed with a Dacron patch through the mitral valve. The early postoperative period was normal. Sinus rhythm was preserved. The patient was found to have died in his sleep one night at the 12th year after surgery (Arrhythmia? Sudden death?). By then, the patient survived with NYHA (New York Heart Association) Class I-II functional capacity and normal ventricular and valvular function without any medication.
2. Senning-Rastelli: A 12-year-old girl presented with symptoms of severe cyanosis and hypoxia. Echocardiography revealed ASI, dextrocardia, congenital cTGA, VSD and pulmonary atresia. The diagnosis was confirmed by angiocardiography and catheterization (Figure 5a). The Senning-Rastelli procedure was performed (This patient was the first patient in Turkey to be subjected to the Senning procedure from the left side due to ASI, October 24, 1995). The Medtronic Freestyle heterograft was used as a morphological right ventricular-pulmonary artery conduit (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) (Figure 5b, c). The postoperative period was uneventful. Sinus rhythm was preserved. Follow-up of the patient has been discontinued 11 years after the surgery, while being followed up with normal cardiac function and with a functional capacity of NHYA Class-I.
3. Senning-Rastelli: A s ix-year-old b oy, w ho underwent central shunt operation at the age of three days, due to deep hypoxic spell. Right atrial isomerism, dextrocardia, ventriculoarterial discordance, VSD and pulmonary atresia were diagnosed by echocardiography and confirmed by angiography. At the age of six years, he underwent Senning-Rastelli type double switch operation (November 03, 2000). Nine years after the double switch operation, supraventricular arrhythmia attacks occurred in the patient. It was then returned to sinus rhythm after the electrophysiological study and catheter ablation. The RV-pulmonary artery conduit (Medtronic Freestyle porcine aortic heterograft), which was calcified after 15 years of double switch operation, was replaced by pulmonary homograft. The patient is currently 21 years old and continues to live with an NYHA Class I-II functional capacity.
Cumulative experience
A total of 20 patients underwent double switch
surgery between January 1995 and May 2017. The
ages of the patients ranged from 4 months to 13 years
(median age 6 years). The Senning-Rastelli procedure
was performed in 17 patients and Senning-arterial
switch procedure in three patients, one of which
included Glenn take-down. Three patients had ASI
with dextrocardia while six had isolated dextrocardia/
mesocardia. Three patients died during the early period
(15%). Three patients (two during the late stage)
needed a permanent pacemaker. One patient underwent
reoperation sixth year after surgery due to intracardiac
tunnel narrowing. Three patients underwent pulmonary
conduit replacement after 8, 10, and 15 years, respectively
after double switch operation.
PHYSIOLOGICAL CORRECTION?
ANATOMICAL CORRECTION?
According to the data obtained, it is generally
accepted that double switch (anatomical correction)
operations in patients with congenital cTGA are
superior to physiological repair in the mid-long
term, in terms of systemic AV valve and systemic
ventricular functions.[1,8-10,14,15,18-23]
Double switch operations are time consuming complex procedures with a high morbidity rate. Although the hospital mortality rate is low in some studies (0-7.9%), according to the common database of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons - The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (STS-EACTS), it is suggested to range between 9.1 to 37.2% (95% interval).[8,18-20,24] According to 5 and 10 years follow-up results after anatomical correction, survival rates are 90% and 85%, respectively, without systemic ventricular dysfunction.[1,2,8,18-20] As one of the most recent data, Hraska et al.[23] reported that 93% of survival and systemic ventricular function could be maintained for 15 years after anatomic correction. According to these results, considering the problems related to late systemic ventricle and tricuspid valve dysfunction after physiological correction compared to early morbidity and mortality risk of anatomical correction, double switch operations have become more preferred procedure. However, patients should be monitored carefully in terms of arrhythmia, neoaortic valve insufficiency, ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary conduit complications. It is inevitable to re-replace the conduit in the long period of Senning- Rastelli procedure. However, over the ten years postoperatively, we may say that there is no need to re-replace the pulmonary conduit more than 60%.[1,8,20]
We believe that some initiatives in the context of physiological repair, which have recently been suggested, should be taken into consideration. Some groups who consider double switch approaches to be complex and risky, suggest that a moderate pulmonary banding may be beneficial in patients with congenital cTGA who have systemic AV valve insufficiency and ventricular dysfunction after physiological repair.[26] By so doing, increasing the pulmonic ventricular pressure (MLV), pushing the interventricular septum towards the systemic ventricle (MRV) can improve systemic ventricular dilatation and tricuspid valve insufficiency.[19,25] In addition, in some patients with pulmonary stenosis, there are studies suggesting permanent palliation with the one-and-a-half ventricle approach by performing bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis. Hence, while maintaining adequate pulmonary flow, preservation of the geometry of the interventricular septum is considered, allowing for some residual pulmonary stenosis.[19,27]
The two-stage double switch approach should be considered as a separate category: In patients with isolated congenital cTGA, a two-stage arterial switch procedure is indicated if systemic ventricular and tricuspid valve dysfunction develops, or if MRV dysfunction occurs in patients with TGA who had previously undergone atrial switch. As a result, retraining the MLV by pulmonary banding in advance, which will assume the systemic ventricular function, is necessary. The MLV may be able to function against systemic pressures within a time interval of three weeks to 6-9 months after the pulmonary banding procedure (retraining of MLV). After the retraining procedure the objective is to maintain the MLV/MRV pressure ratio greater than 0.8 and the MLV mass/volume index greater than 1.5.[15,17] However, in patients who underwent the double switch operation after the retraining procedure, there are concerns that the mid and long term performance of the systemic ventricle (MLV) may not be as expected.[4,17,19] And although the retraining procedure improves systolic ventricular function, pathologic ventricular mass which arise due to myocardial hypertrophy has been shown to cause diastolic dysfunction.
On the other hand, it is suggested that the retraining procedure is more effective in little babies (before the age of 2 years), but may not be benefited especially if they are performed after 15 years of age.[4,17,19]
What have we learned?
1. In patients with congenital cTGA, anatomical
correction seems to gain importance in terms of
the preservation of ventricular function and longterm
survival when compared to conventionalphysiological
correction approaches.
2. Procedures such as pulmonary banding, 1.5-ventricle type repair are remarkable and the long term results should be followed.
3. In order to make a definite judgment about double switch operations, there is a need longer follow-up studies with a lager sample size patient data.
4. In two-stage double switch operations; concerns about long-term outcomes of left ventricular function should be taken into nconsideration. It should not be ignored that it may not be effective, especially in older children.
5. Patients undergone double switch operation should be carefully monitored during the late stage, with regards to ventricular functions, rhythm problems, neoaortic insufficiency, and complications of pulmonary conduit.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to
the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.
1) Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Hanley FL, Kirklin JK,
editors. Congenitally corrected transposition of the great
arteries and other forms of atrioventricular discordant
connection. In: Kirklin/Barratt-Boyes Cardiac Surgery.
Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p. 1971-2003.
2) Ilbawi MN, DeLeon SY, Backer CL, Duffy CE, Muster
AJ, Zales VR, et al. An alternative approach to the surgical
management of physiologically corrected transposition with
ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis or atresia. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:410-5.
3) Hraska V, Duncan BW, Mayer JE Jr, Freed M, del Nido PJ,
Jonas RA. Long-term outcome of surgically treated patients
with corrected transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:182-91.
4) Lim HG, Lee JR, Kim YJ, Park YH, Jun TG, Kim WH,
et al. Outcomes of biventricular repair for congenitally
corrected transposition of the great arteries. Ann Thorac
Surg 2010;89:159-67.
5) Sano T, Riesenfeld T, Karl TR, Wilkinson JL. Intermediateterm
outcome after intracardiac repair of associated cardiac
defects in patients with atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial
discordance. Circulation 1995;92:272-8.
6) van Son JA, Danielson GK, Huhta JC, Warnes CA, Edwards
WD, Schaff HV, et al. Late results of systemic atrioventricular
valve replacement in corrected transposition. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:642-52.
7) Brawn WJ, Jones TJJ, Anderson RH, Barron DJ. Congenitally
corrected transposition. In: Anderson RH, Baker EJ, Penny
D, Redington AN, Rigby ML, Wernonovsky G, editors.
Pediatric Cardiology. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstene
Elsevier; 2010. p. 819-35.
8) Brawn WJ. The double switch for atrioventricular discordance.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu
2005:51-6.
9) El-Zein C, Subramanian S, Ilbawi M. Evolution of the
surgical approach to congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr
Card Surg Annu 2015;18:25-33.
10) Bilal MS, Avşar MK, Yıldırım Ö, Özyüksel A, Zeybek C,
Küçükosmanoğlu O, et al. Double Switch Procedure and
Surgical Alternatives for the Treatment of Congenitally
Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries. J Card Surg
2016;31:231-6.
11) Karl TR, Weintraub RG, Brizard CP, Cochrane AD, Mee
RB. Senning plus arterial switch operation for discordant
(congenitally corrected) transposition. Ann Thorac Surg
1997;64:495-502.
12) Sarıoğlu T, Erek E. Büyük arterlerin transpozisyonunda
anatomik düzeltme. Türkiye Klinikleri Kardiyoloji Dergisi;
(T Klin J Cardiol), 2003;16:347-54.
13) Erek E, Sarıoğlu T, Büyük arterlerin transpozisyonu. In: Paç
M, Akçevin A, Aka SA, Büket S, Sarıoğlu T, editor. Kalp
Damar Cerrahisi. 2. Baskı. Ankara: MN Medikal & Nobel
2013. s. 2027-37.
14) Mee RB. The double switch operation with accent on the
Senning component. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr
Card Surg Annu 2005:57-65.
15) Hraska V, Murin P. Surgical Management of Congenital
Heart Disease I. Berlin: Springer. 2012.
16) Da Silva JP, Da Silva LF, Baumgratz JF, Castro RM, Bezerra
RF, Guilhen JC. Root translocation in congenitally corrected
transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect
and pulmonary stenosis, and other lesions. Semin Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2015;18:34-9.
17) Quinn DW, McGuirk SP, Metha C, Nightingale P, de
Giovanni JV, Dhillon R, et al. The morphologic left ventricle
that requires training by means of pulmonary artery
banding before the double-switch procedure for congenitally
corrected transposition of the great arteries is at risk of late
dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:1137-44.
18) Ly M, Belli E, Leobon B, Kortas C, Grollmüss OE,
Piot D, et al. Results of the double switch operation for
congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Eur
J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:879-83.
19) Jonas RA, editor. Congenitally corrected transposition of the
great arteries. In: Comprehensive surgical management of
Congenital heart disease. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press;
2014. p. 644-6. p. 483-498.
20) Murtuza B, Barron DJ, Stumper O, Stickley J, Eaton D,
Jones TJ, et al. Anatomic repair for congenitally corrected
transposition of the great arteries: a single-institution 19-year
experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:1348-57.
21) Erek E, Yalcinbas YK, Salihoglu E, Ozturk N, Arat S,
Sarioglu A, et al. Fate of stentless bioprostheses on right side
of the heart. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2003;11:58-62.
22) Imai Y, Seo K, Aoki M, Shin'oka T, Hiramatsu K, Ohta
A. Double-Switch operation for congenitally corrected
transposition. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card
Surg Annu 2001;4:16-33.
23) Hraska V, Vergnat M, Zartner P, Hart C, Suchowerskyj
P, Bierbach B, et al. Promising Outcome of Anatomic
Correction of Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries.
Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:650-6.
24) O'Brien SM, Clarke DR, Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Lacour-
Gayet FG, Pizarro C, et al. An empirically based tool for
analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:1139-53.
25) Ma K, Gao H, Hua Z, Yang K, Hu S, Zhang H, et
al. Palliative pulmonary artery banding versus anatomic
correction for congenitally corrected transposition of the
great arteries with regressed morphologic left ventricle:
long-term results from a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 2014;148:1566-71.