Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2017, a total of 71 patients (58 males, 13 females; mean age: 62±9.6 years; range, 38 to 78 years) with a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival and five-year overall survival rates were evaluated.
Results: The mean overall survival was 60.7±6.9 months with a five-year survival rate of 44.3%. The mean overall survival and five-year overall survival rates according to disease stage were as follows: Stage 1, 67±10.8 months (46%); Stage 2, 61.4±10.8 months (45%); and Stage 3, 33.2±8.6 months (32%) (p=0.02). The mean overall survival and five-year overall survival rate according to histological types were as follows: in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 59.4±9.2 months (45%); in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 68.6±12.2 months (43%); and in combined-type neuroendocrine carcinoma, 40.9±10.1 months (35%) (p=0.34).
Conclusion: Thoracic surgeons should be very selective in performing pulmonary resection in patients with Stage 3 high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas and combined cell subtype tumors.
In the literature, there is a limited number of studies investigating the prognosis and surgical results for HGNCs. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate surgical results for HGNCs and to identify the factors that influence prognosis.
All patients were smokers and stopped smoking at least one week before surgery. Preoperatively, all patients underwent thoracic computed tomography (CT), cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Transthoracic needle aspiration and/or bronchoscopy was performed at least once in all patients for diagnosis. In 32 (45%) patients, histological diagnosis could not be achieved preoperatively. Decisions regarding operability were made based on CT and PET. Eleven of the patients (15.5%) were diagnosed incidentally during routine medical check-ups.
Mediastinoscopy was performed in 39 patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of lung carcinoma. Mediastinoscopy was also performed in 15 patients without a carcinoma diagnosis who had mediastinal lymph nodes greater than 1 cm in diameter spotted in CT and/or positive PET scans, hilar lymph node positivity, or tumors necessitating pneumonectomy. Mediastinoscopy was not performed in patients with undiagnosed T1 tumors (n=11). All patients received chemotherapy and radiotherapy, when N2 disease was identified. Patients with small cell carcinoma and combined carcinoma HGNCs including the small cell component received cranial irradiation. All cases were routinely followed by CT at a six-month interval.
The 8th edition of the Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) classification of malignant tumors, assessed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASCL) Committee, was used for staging.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM
SPSS version 21.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk,
NY, USA). Descriptive data were expressed in
mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (min-max) or
number and frequency. Survival curves were estimated
using the Kaplan-Meier analyses, and log-rank tests
were performed to determine the significance of
differences in survival between groups. A p value of
<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In all, 31 of 71 tumors were T1 (43.6%). Of 31 patients with T1 tumors, nine (29%) had preoperative diagnosis and 22 patients did not. A total of 31 cases were Stage 1 (43.6%), 23 were Stage 2 (32.3%), and 17 were Stage 3 (24.1%). Stage distribution is shown in Table 1.
Of 65 patients who had anatomical pulmonary resection, 54 (76.1%) underwent lobectomy and 11 (15.5%) underwent pneumonectomy. Mediastinoscopy was performed in 54 patients (83%) before anatomic pulmonary resection. No mortality was observed either perioperatively or postoperatively.
The patients who underwent anatomic pulmonary resections were considered in survival analyses. The mean overall survival was 60.7±6.9 months, with a five-year survival rate of 44.3%. In addition, patients with Stage 3 disease had the worst prognosis (p=0.02). The mean overall survival and five-year overall survival rates were 67±10.8 months (46%) for Stage 1, 61.4±10.8 months (45%) for Stage 2, and 33.2±8.6 months (32%) for Stage 3 (Figure 1). In six patients with wedge resections, the mean survival was 60.3±12.8 months, and the five-year survival rate was 55%.
Figure 1. Overall survival of patients according to pathological stages.
When overall survival was compared according to histopathological types, combined neuroendocrine carcinomas were associated with the poorest overall survival; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.34). The mean overall survival and five-year overall survival rates were 59.4±9.2 months (45%) for LCNEC, 68.6±12.2 months (43%) for small cell NETs and 40.9±10.1 months (35%) for combined NETs (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Overall survival of patients according to histological subtypes.
When the five-year overall survival rates were analyzed by N status, the mean rates were 65.9±8.3 months (50%) in patients with N0 disease, 53.6±10.6 (42%) for N1 disease, and 37.1±15.3 months (35%) for N2 disease, (p=0.103). As expected, the patients with N0 disease had a significantly better prognosis, compared to patients with N2 disease (p=0.009) (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Overall survival of patients according to N status.
Chemotherapy alone seems to be an insufficient treatment for SCLC. Although it is associated with favorable initial results, there is a local relapse rate of 90% after chemotherapy.[6] Median survival after treatment of limited disease is 15 to 20 months. For higher-stage diseases, median survival is 8 to 13 months, with a two-year survival rate of 5%.[7] Namikawa et al.[8] reported that the five-year survival rate of patients with Stage 1 small cell carcinoma was 75%. Therefore, treatment must always include systemic measures to control locoregional recurrence and treat distant tumor cells, if present.
Small cell and LCNECs are classified as high-grade NETs based on the 2015 WHO criteria.[2] Aggressive clinical progress is correlated with histopathological parameters. Cytological characteristics are clearly identified; however, it is not always possible to clearly differentiate between these two tumor types pathologically.[9] Moreover, it is not always possible to discriminate between NSCLC and AC tumors after immunohistochemical and morphological analyses.[10] Molecular studies have revealed that these tumors share common mutations.[11]
While there is a local relapse rate of 90% after chemotherapy in small cell tumors, the rate of local recurrence is lower in LCNECs, as these tumors are usually peripherally located.[5] In our study, overall survival was higher than expected, possibly as many patients had T1 tumors. A similar cause-and-effect relationship was observed by Welter et al.[5] A lthough h igh-grade N ETs of the lung have poor prognosis, compared to other NSCLCs,[12-14] satisfactory survival rates were observed in our study.
The relatively high overall survival in the present study may be attributable to the fact that most patients had early-stage high grade neuro-endocrine (HGNE) lung cancers. Overall, 31 of our 71 patients (43.6%) had T1 tumors. Among 31 patients with T1 tumors, only nine (29%) had a preoperative diagnosis. Twenty-two patients with undiagnosed T1 tumors had peripheral tumors, and diagnostic procedures such as bronchoscopy and transthoracic thin needle aspirations were inadequate. Operability was assessed by CT and PET scans in this group of patients.
In a study by Mochizuki et al.[3] that included 21 cases, 20 patients with tumors were detected after routine check-up procedures. Large cell carcinomas were the most common subtype (49.3%) in the HGNC group, while combined cell carcinomas were in the minority (16.9%). Patients with SCLCs had the highest five-year overall survival rate (43%); patients with combined cell carcinomas had the lowest (35%). Stage 3 patients including those with N2 disease had by far the worst prognosis. Our survival analyses demonstrated that a conservative approach may be necessary while evaluating patients with Stage 3 HGNC, combined cell subtype.
The difference in prognosis between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC was not well-defined. Several retrospective studies have reported similar prognoses between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC patients who underwent surgical resection.[8,15-17] However, Varlotto et al.[18] showed that overall survival for high-grade LCNEC patients undergoing surgery without radiation was higher to a non-significant degree than for high-grade SCLC patients. Isaka et al.[19] also found that Stage 1A LCNEC patients undergoing surgery had an increased overall survival rate, compared to small cell cases.
We performed sublobar wedge resection in six cases, due to poor cardiopulmonary status with no preoperative diagnosis. Interestingly, improved survival was observed in this group of patients. This apparent effect may be due to the small number of cases. Meanwhile, two retrospective studies reported that sublobar resection did not affect survival in LCNEC patients;[20,21] however, the authors were unable to draw any definitive conclusions based on the data. Regarding SCLC, a retrospective study by Brock et al.[22] showed that sublobar resection was an independent negative prognostic factor. Furthermore, Schreiber et al.[23] reported that the prognosis of the patients who underwent lobectomy was better than that of those who underwent sublobar resection and, thus, recommended lobectomy for this group of patients.
Nonetheless, the present study has several limitations. First, it has a single-center, retrospective, non-randomized design. Although our study included a relatively large number of patients, most cases did not have a preoperative diagnosis, which may have introduced a strong selection bias. Second, the adjuvant chemotherapy regimens were not standardized, as the patients received their treatments at different institutions. Disease-free interval was not obtained due to lack of follow-up data.
In conclusion, favorable survival rates can be achieved in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas tumors who are surgically operated and receive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, mediastinal radiation therapy when necessary, and protective cranial radiotherapy. It should be noted that Stage 3 disease, N2 disease, and combined high-grade neuroendocrine tissue type are associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, thoracic surgeons should be very selective while performing pulmonary resections in this limited subgroup of patients.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by the Yedikule Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Hospital Ethics Committee (Date: 10.3.2022, no: 2022-199). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Patient Consent for Publication: A written informed consent was obtained from each patient.
Data Sharing Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author Contributions: Concept, writing the article, supervision: M.A.B.; Analysis, interpretation: N.Ü.; Literature review, critical review: Y.S.; Data collection, references: N.A.; Materials: N.F.; Design, analysis: L.C.; Review: M.K.; Supervision: S.A.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-touse
software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow
Transplant 2013;48:452-8.
2) Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y,
Austin JHM, Beasley MB, et al. The 2015 World Health
Organization classification of lung tumors: Impact of
genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004
classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1243-60.
3) Mochizuki E, Matsuura S, Oishi K, Miyashita K, Ichijyo
K, Furukawa S, et al. Surgical resection for clinical stage I
high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. World J
Surg Oncol 2018;16:33.
4) Niiranen A. Long-term survival in small cell carcinoma of
the lung. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1988;24:749-52.
5) Welter S, Aigner C, Roesel C. The role of surgery in high
grade neuroendocrine tumours of the lung. J Thorac Dis
2017;9(Suppl 15):S1474-S1483.
6) Elias AD. Small cell lung cancer: State-of-the-art therapy in
1996. Chest 1997;112(4 Suppl):251S-258S.
7) van Meerbeeck JP, Fennell DA, De Ruysscher DK. Smallcell
lung cancer. Lancet 2011;378:1741-55.
8) Namikawa S, Den T, Kimura M, Kusagawa M. The role of
surgical resection and the effects of neo-adjuvant therapy
in the management of small cell lung cancer. Surg Today
1994;24:342-6.
9) Marchevsky AM, Gal AA, Shah S, Koss MN. Morphometry
confirms the presence of considerable nuclear size overlap
between "small cells" and "large cells" in high-grade
pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol
2001;116:466-72.
10) Thunnissen E, Borczuk AC, Flieder DB, Witte B, Beasley
MB, Chung JH, et al. The use of immunohistochemistry
improves the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer and its
differential diagnosis. An international reproducibility
study in a demanding set of cases. J Thorac Oncol
2017;12:334-46.
11) Pelosi G, Bianchi F, Dama E, Simbolo M, Mafficini A,
Sonzogni A, et al. Most high-grade neuroendocrine tumours of the lung are likely to secondarily develop from preexisting
carcinoids: Innovative findings skipping the current
pathogenesis paradigm. Virchows Arch 2018;472:567-77.
12) Asamura H, Kameya T, Matsuno Y, Noguchi M, Tada H,
Ishikawa Y, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung: A
prognostic spectrum. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:70-6.
13) Battafarano RJ, Fernandez FG, Ritter J, Meyers BF, Guthrie
TJ, Cooper JD, et al. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma:
An aggressive form of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:166-72.
14) Iyoda A, Hiroshima K, Toyozaki T, Haga Y, Fujisawa T,
Ohwada H. Clinical characterization of pulmonary large cell
neuroendocrine carcinoma and large cell carcinoma with
neuroendocrine morphology. Cancer 2001;91:1992-2000.
15) Wang J, Ye L, Cai H, Jin M. Comparative study of large cell
neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma
in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: A large
population-based study. J Cancer 2019;10:4226-36.
16) Kinoshita T, Yoshida J, Ishii G, Aokage K, Hishida T,
Nagai K. The differences of biological behavior based on
the clinicopathological data between resectable large-cell
neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung carcinoma.
Clin Lung Cancer 2013;14:535-40.
17) Sun L, Sakurai S, Sano T, Hironaka M, Kawashima O,
Nakajima T. High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the
lung: Comparative clinicopathological study of large cell
neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma.
Pathol Int 2009;59:522-9.
18) Varlotto JM, Medford-Davis LN, Recht A, Flickinger JC,
Schaefer E, Zander DS, et al. Should large cell neuroendocrine
lung carcinoma be classified and treated as a small cell lung
cancer or with other large cell carcinomas? J Thorac Oncol
2011;6:1050-8.
19) Isaka M, Nakagawa K, Ohde Y, Okumura T, Watanabe
R, Ito I, et al. A clinicopathological study of peripheral,
small-sized high-grade neuroendocrine tumours of the lung:
Differences between small-cell lung carcinoma and largecell
neuroendocrine carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2012;41:841-6.
20) Ogawa H, Tanaka Y, Kitamura Y, Shimizu N, Doi T, Hokka D,
et al. Efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for pulmonary
high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas: A propensity score
matching analysis. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:1145-54.
21) Veronesi G, Morandi U, Alloisio M, Terzi A, Cardillo G,
Filosso P, et al. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the
lung: A retrospective analysis of 144 surgical cases. Lung
Cancer 2006;53:111-5.