Ateş et al.[
1] are sincerely commended for
sharing an enriching clinical experience on the
outcomes of concomitant off-pump coronary artery
bypass grafting (CABG) and pulmonary operations.
Having said that, there exist other intricacies in the
subject, necessitating discussion. To begin with,
the authors did not account for preoperative left
ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in their
retrospective analysis.[
1] The former is difficult
to overlook given the advanced age of the study
participants (69.7±6.6 years) where all of the
23 patients happened to be in New York Heart
Association (NYHA) functional Class III with 21
of them presenting with systemic hypertension.[1,2]
In this regard, Ateş et al.[1] ought to have presented
the body mass index of their study participants.[1,2]
It needs to be emphasized here that documenting
preserved LV ejection fraction (EF); i.e., an EF
in excess of 50% in the present study provides far
from a holistic picture, considering the recognition
of heart failure with preserved EF or heart
failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
in such patients coming for CABG.[
1-
3] However,
speaking of LVDD in relation to the present patient
subset undergoing concomitant off-pump CABG
and pulmonary operation, the cardiopulmonary
interactions could have also likely played an
important role. Meanwhile LVDD predisposes to
post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) or PH
due to left heart disease, PH simultaneously results
due to lung diseases, rendering the matter pretty
much a double-trouble situation, as highlighted in a review on PH and thoracic surgery by Nonaka et
al.[
4] Even in specific reference to the postoperative
complications, independent researchers such as
Braksator et al.[
3] tend to associate LVDD with
adverse respiratory outcomes following CABG,
again buttressing the importance of above
mentioned discussion in the context of a concurrent
lung operation, as was the case in the Ateş et al.
study.[
1]
Data Sharing Statement: The data that support the findings
of this study are available from the corresponding author upon
reasonable request.
Conflict of Interest: The author declared no conflicts of
interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this
article.
Funding: The author received no financial support for the
research and/or authorship of this article.