Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between January 1, 2015, and January 31, 2024, with 793 patients (632 males, 160 females; mean age: 65±12 years; range, 11 to 93 years) who underwent lung tru-cut biopsy under computed tomography guidance. Patients whose radiologic and pathology records were accessible via the Hospital Information System and the Picture Archiving and Communication System were included.
Results: A total of 973 tru-cut biopsy procedures were performed. There was no statistically significant difference in age distribution between sexes (p=0.15). Most biopsies were performed on the upper lobes, predominantly the right upper lobe (33.2%). The supine position was the most commonly used during the procedure (49.4%). The mean lesion diameter and distance from the chest wall were 49±17 mm and 51±16 mm, respectively. A definitive diagnosis was obtained on the first attempt in 78.6% of patients, while repeat biopsies were required in 21.4%. Primary lung malignancy was diagnosed in 63% of cases. Postprocedural complications included pneumothorax in 16.1%, intraparenchymal hemorrhage in 0.1%, hemoptysis in 0.1%, and hemothorax in 0.1% of patients. Complications were most frequently observed following biopsies of the left lower lobe (32.4%). Lesions located in the upper lobes were significantly more likely to be malignant (p=0.01). A significant increase in complication rates was observed with greater parenchymal tissue penetration during the procedure (p=0.001).
Conclusion: Computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsies can be performed more safely by thoracic surgeons due to their procedural experience. Additionally, in the event of complications, thoracic surgeons are more capable of providing prompt and effective intervention, thereby enhancing patient safety. Thoracic surgeons should be actively involved in all diagnostic stages of pulmonary or mediastinal nodules or masses, including procedures such as tru-cut lung biopsy and endobronchial ultrasonography.
Today, endobronchial and image-guided (computed tomography [CT], ultrasonography) percutaneous methods, which are less invasive than surgery, have become the preferred diagnostic techniques. In patients whose lesion localization is unsuitable for endoscopic interventions, PTLB under CT guidance is generally preferred. Image-guided biopsies include fine-needle aspiration and core needle (tru-cut) biopsy. While fine-needle biopsy allows for cytological examination of aspirated material, tru-cut biopsy enables multiple immunohistochemical staining and certain molecular biology analyses to investigate tumor architecture.
Indications for PTLB are as follows: peripheral or hilar masses or pulmonary nodules not accessible by bronchoscopy; suspicion of mediastinal invasion in the presence of lung cancer or enlarged hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes; undiagnosed mediastinal masses; pleural thickening suspicious for malignancy; and focal or multifocal parenchymal consolidations or abscesses with no infectious agent detected.[5] Contraindications for PTLB include vascular lesions such as arteriovenous malformations and pulmonary varices, thrombocytopenia, respiratory failure (FEV1 [forced expiratory volume in 1 sec] <%35), patients with myocardial infarction, uncooperative patient, uncontrollable cough, and bullous lung. Biopsy must be strictly avoided in cases of suspected hydatid cyst. Relative contraindications for PTLB include severe obstructive lung disease, coagulopathy, moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension, ventilator dependence, and patients with prior pneumonectomy.
The aim of this study was to analyze patients who underwent tru-cut biopsy under CT guidance in our thoracic surgery clinic with respect to age, sex, lesion location, size, distance from the thoracic wall, patient position during biopsy, and the relationship of accompanying lesions with diagnosis and complications and to contribute to the existing literature through comparative evaluation. Additionally, we sought to encourage thoracic surgeons to perform this procedure by outlining the management of complications arising after PTLB.
Before the procedure, bleeding diathesis and the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications were assessed, and these medications were discontinued for an appropriate duration. Complete blood count and bleeding parameters (activated prothrombin time, INR [international normalized ratio]) were evaluated; the procedure was performed in patients with platelet counts >50,000 and INR <1.5.[6] Fasting was not recommended prior to the procedure, and no antibiotics were administered before or after the procedure.
Biopsies were performed under sterile conditions using a 256-slice Siemens Somatom Definition AS CT scanner (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). Lesions were evaluated with 1-mm CT images. An 18-gauge semiautomatic biopsy needle was used in all procedures. After determining the optimal patient position and shortest path to the lesion, radiopaque metal markers were placed on the chest wall closest to the lesion. Using 1-mm CT images, the distance to the lesion was measured. If the location was suitable, the entry site was marked and cleaned with povidone-iodine, and local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine was administered. The needle was advanced through the pleura toward the lesion, and 1-mm control images were obtained (Figure 1). The biopsy specimen was placed in a sterile 10% formalin solution. After the procedure, control CT images were acquired and complications were evaluated. A chest radiograph was obtained 3-4 h after the procedure to evaluate delayed complications. Patients without complications were discharged the same day.
Postprocedure CT images were compared with preprocedure images to evaluate the following complications: pneumothorax (air in the pleural space), hemothorax (fluid), and intraparenchymal hemorrhage (ground-glass opacities in the parenchyma). Preprocedure CT images were analyzed to assess cavitation (low-density areas within the lesion) and emphysematous changes in the parenchyma.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version
27.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Normality of data distribution was assessed with
the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables
were analyzed with Student"s t-test, and categorical
data were analyzed with the chi-square test. One-way
analysis of variance was used for group comparisons.
A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically
significant in all analyses.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients
Diagnoses were confirmed in 623 (78.6%) patients during the initial biopsy, while 21.4% required repeat biopsies (160 patients underwent two biopsies, 10 patients underwent three). Final pathology results included benign or necrotic findings in 28.9%, primary lung malignancy in 63%, and lymphoma, thymoma, or metastasis in 8.1% of the cases. Among primary lung cancers, 28.1% (n=223) of cases were adenocarcinoma, 10.3% were squamous cell carcinoma, 4.9% were small cell lung cancer, and 19.7% were non-small cell lung cancers of unspecified subtype. Other diagnoses included normal lung parenchyma (12.7%), pneumonia or chronic infection (10.2%), necrosis (3.2%), granulomatous disease (1.5%), and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (1%). Postprocedural complications included pneumothorax (16.1%), intraparenchymal hemorrhage (0.1%), hemoptysis (0.1%), and hemothorax (0.1%). Over half of patients with complications received only oxygen therapy, while 44.7% (7.29% of all procedures) required tube thoracostomy. Repeat biopsy rates were significantly higher in patients requiring tube thoracostomy (35% vs. 22%, p=0.04; Table 2). No patient required surgical intervention for complications, and there were no procedure-related in-hospital mortalities.
Complications were most frequent following left lower lobe biopsies (32.4%), whereas no complications occurred in mediastinal tumor biopsies; this difference was statistically significant (p=0.011). One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences in chest-wall distance among lobar biopsy sites (p=0.08). Cavitation rate was lowest in right lower lobe lesions (16%) and highest in left upper lobe lesions (30%). This difference was statistically significant (p=0.025). When repeat biopsies were evaluated, it was found that 35.1% of the left lower lobe lesions and none of the right middle lobe lesions required repeat biopsy, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). Lesion location showed no significant association with tumor size (p=0.074; Table 3).
Table 3. Results according to lesion localization
Factors influencing benign versus malignant outcomes were assessed. Male sex and advanced age were identified as significant risk factors for malignancy (p=0.01). Lesion diameter and chest-wall distance did not significantly affect benign versus malignant outcomes (p=0.20 and p=0.70, respectively). Cavitation and laterality (right vs. l eft) d id n ot h ave a s ignificant e ffect o n benign versus malignant outcomes (p=0.90 and p=0.74, respectively). However, upper lobe lesions were significantly more likely to be malignant (p=0.01; Table 4).
Age and sex had no effect on the development of complications (p=0.11 and p=0.45, respectively). Complication rates were significantly higher in benign lesions compared to malignant ones (p=0.023). Although left lower lobe biopsies had a higher complication rate, neither laterality (right vs. left) nor lobar group (upper vs. lower) significantly affected complication risk (p=0.41 and p=0.25, respectively). Lesions adjacent to the chest wall were associated with fewer complications (p=0.01). An increased volume of traversed parenchyma during biopsy was significantly associated with higher complication rates (p=0.01). Tumor diameter had no significant effect on the development of complications (p=0.127). Complications were most frequent in the lateral biopsy position (p=0.009). No significant difference was found between supine and prone positions. Emphysema did not increase complication risk (p=0.17). However, the distance of the lesion to the chest wall was significantly shorter in patients with emphysema (p=0.01; Table 4). Lesion diameter, distance of the lesion from the chest wall, and cavitation had no significant effect on the need for repeat biopsy (p=0.89, p=0.94, and p=0.89, respectively).
In the literature, the diagnostic rate of PTLB for benign and malignant lesions has been reported as 85 to 95%.[7,8,10-12] In the present study, the diagnostic rate on the first attempt was 78.6%. Percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy is a user-dependent technique that requires experience and manual dexterity. Our results may have been influenced by the fact that procedures were performed by multiple thoracic surgeons with varying levels of experience and technical skill.
Prior studies have reported that biopsies are most frequently performed in the right upper lobe.[13] Similarly, in our cohort, the right upper lobe was the most common biopsy site, and 33.3% of these patients had lesions smaller than 3 cm. There was no association between laterality (right vs. left) and malignancy (p=0.74). However, malignancy was significantly more frequent in upper lobe lesions (p=0.01). There was no association between lesion location and tumor diameter (p=0.74).
Male sex and advanced age were significantly associated with malignancy (p=0.01). Patient positioning during biopsy is crucial for selecting the shortest trajectory to the lesion, ensuring patient comfort, and avoiding intercostal obstruction. The literature reports that the prone position is optimal for biopsy due to reduced respiratory motion, wider intercostal spaces, and decreased patient anxiety.[14] However, in the present study, supine position was preferred most frequently (49.4%). In the present study, the highest complication rate occurred in the lateral position (p=0.009), which we attribute to patient discomfort and suboptimal intercostal space widening. The lack of significant differences in complication rates among other positions supports this interpretation.
In our series, complications were most common following left lower lobe biopsies (32.4%, p=0.001), with no significant differences among the other lobes (p=0.074). Approximately one-third of the lesions in the left lower lobe (33%) and the right lower lobe (34%) were smaller than 3 cm. We believe that the higher complication rate in left lower lobe biopsies is due to greater diaphragmatic movement on the left side compared to the limited movement on the right hemidiaphragm stabilized by the liver.
Studies have reported that most biopsied lesions are solid.[13] Similarly, 74.8% of lesions in our cohort were solid. Cavitary lesions were most common in the upper lobes (30%) and least frequent in the right lower lobe (16%). There was no association between cavitation and benign versus malignant status (p=0.90).
Neither age nor sex influenced complication rates in the present study (p=0.11, p=0.45). Complication rates were significantly higher in benign lesions compared to malignant ones (p=0.023).
No association was found between lesion diameter or chest-wall distance and the need for repeat biopsy (p=0.089, p=0.94).
The most common complications of PTLB are pneumothorax and parenchymal hemorrhage. Less frequent complications include hemothorax, chest-wall hematoma, and vasovagal reactions. Rare complications include air embolism, hemoptysis, cardiac tamponade, and malignant seeding along the biopsy tract.[9,15,16] In the present study, complication rates increased significantly with greater volumes of traversed parenchyma (p=0.001), whereas tumor diameter had no significant impact on complication development (p=0.127).
Pneumothorax is the most common complication, with a reported incidence of 0 to 61%.[15,16] Tube thoracostomy rates range from 1.5 to 21%.[16,17] Retrospective studies highlight lesion size, biopsy tract length, and operator experience as key risk factors for pneumothorax.[18] In our cohort, variability in operator expertise may have influenced complication rates. Lesions closer to the chest wall were associated with fewer complications (p=0.01). Pneumothorax occurred in 16.1% of procedures. More than half of the patients who developed complications required only oxygen therapy, while tube thoracostomy was performed in 7.29% of all procedures. Patients who underwent tube thoracostomy had a significantly higher repeat biopsy rate compared to the overall group (35% vs. 22%; p=0.04).
Intrapulmonary hemorrhage is reported as the second most frequent complication, with an incidence of 1.5 to 21%.[19,20] Studies evaluating the risk factors for developing parenchymal hemorrhage emphasize lesion size, intrapulmonary biopsy-tract length, and the number of pleural passes as significant contributors.[21,22] In our series, intraparenchymal hemorrhage was detected in eight (0.1%) patients.
Hemoptysis incidence in the literature ranges from 1.1 to 5%.[23] In our cohort, hemoptysis developed in four (0.1%) patients. Hemoptysis is due to alveolar bleeding and is usually self-limiting. It is sufficient for the harvest to lie on the biopsy side. If it continues, antitussives can be started.
A significant association between age and pneumothorax has been reported in the literature, attributed to decreased lung compliance and increased emphysema with advancing age.[24] In our cohort, emphysema did not significantly increase complication risk (p=0.17). We believe that the significantly shorter chest-wall distance in emphysematous patients (p=0.01) may have mitigated this risk.
Hemothorax results from injury to intercostal or pulmonary arteries and may require surgical intervention. In our cohort, hemothorax occurred in one (0.1%) patient. Air embolism, cardiac tamponade, bronchopleural fistula, pulmonary torsion, and vasovagal reaction are rare complications.[25,26] These complications were not observed in any of our patients. Tumor seeding along the biopsy tract, particularly in subpleural biopsies, has been reported in the literature.[27] Tumor seeding was not detected in any of our patients. No mortality occurred in our series.
This study has several limitations. First, the retrospective design may have introduced selection bias and limited the ability to control for confounding factors. Second, the study was conducted in a single tertiary referral center, which may restrict the generalizability of the findings to other institutions or broader patient populations.
In conclusion, computed tomography-guided tru-cut lung biopsy is a reliable diagnostic method with a high diagnostic yield and low complication rate. Our experience suggests that thoracic surgeons can achieve outcomes comparable to those reported in the literature, with the added benefit of on-site surgical expertise for complication management. Increased experience in this field is likely to enhance diagnostic efficiency and improve patient safety.
Data Sharing Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author Contributions: Idea, materials: M.A.T., I.E.O.; Design, writing the article, references and fundings: M.A.T.; Control, literature review: B.M.; Data collection: O.T. M.A.E.; Analysis: O.T.; Critical review: B.M., I.E.O.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
1) Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C,
Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide:
Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.
Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210.
2) Hacıkamiloğlu E, Gültekin M, Boztaş G, Dündar S, Şimşek
Utku E, Kavak EA, ve ark. Türkiye Kanser İstatistikleri
Ankara: T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türk Halk Sağlığı Kurumu;
2017.
3) Pirozynski M: Historical Review: 100 years of lung cancer.
Respiratory Medicine 2006;100:2073-84.
4) Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D.
Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69-90.
doi: 10.3322/caac.20107.
5) Sanders C. Transthoracic needle aspiration. Clin Chest Med
1992;13:11-6.
6) Veltri A, Bargellini I, Giorgi L, Almeida PAMS, Akhan O.
CIRSE Guidelines on Percutaneous Needle Biopsy (PNB).
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017;40:1501-13. doi: 10.1007/
s00270-017-1658-5.
7) Aktaş AR, Gözlek E, Yılmaz Ö, Kayan M, Ünlü N, Demirtaş
H, et al. CT-guided transthoracic biopsy: Histopathologic
results and complication rates. Diagn Interv Radiol
2015;21:67-70. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.140140.
8) Beslic S, Zukic F, Milisic S. Percutaneous transthoracic
CT guided biopsies of lung lesions; Fine needle aspiration
biopsy versus core biopsy. Radiol Oncol 2012;46:19-22. doi:10.2478/v10019-012-0004-4.
9) Loubeyre P, Copercini M, Dietrich PY. Percutaneous
CT-guided multisampling core needle biopsy of thoracic
lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1294-8. doi: 10.2214/
AJR.04.1344.
10) Chami HA, Faraj W, Yehia ZA, Badour SA, Sawan P,
Rebeiz K, et al. Predictors of pneumothorax after CT-guided
transthoracic needle lung biopsy: The role of quantitative CT.
Clin Radiol 2015;70:1382-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.08.003.
11) De Filippo M, Saba L, Silva M, Zagaria R, Concari
G, Nizzoli R, et al. CT-guided biopsy of pulmonary
nodules: Is pulmonary hemorrhage a complication or an
advantage? Diagn Interv Radiol 2014;20:421-5. doi: 10.5152/
dir.2014.14019.
12) Li Y, Du Y, Yang HF, Yu JH, Xu XX. CT-guided
percutaneous core needle biopsy for small (?20 mm)
pulmonary lesions. Clin Radiol 2013;68:e43-8. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2012.09.008.
13) Dere O, Kolu M, Ağyar A, Bekin Sarıkaya ZP, Hocanlı
İ, Dusak A. BT kılavuzluğunda transtorasik kesici iğne
akciğer biyopsisi: Tanısal etkinliği ve komplikasyon
oranları. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
2019;16:227-30.
14) Winokur RS, Pua BB, Sullivan BW, Madoff DC.
Percutaneous lung biopsy: Technique, efficacy, and
complications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013;30:121-7. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1342952.
15) Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, Gleeson F, Miller R, Moss
H, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy.
Thorax 2003;58:920-36. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920.
16) Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, Martinez FJ. Risk of
pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration
biopsy of the lung. Radiology 1996;198:371-5. doi: 10.1148/
radiology.198.2.8596834.
17) Topal U, Berkman YM. Effect of needle tract bleeding
on occurrence of pneumothorax after transthoracic
needle biopsy. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.
ejrad.2004.05.008.
18) Yeow KM, Su IH, Pan KT, Tsay PK, Lui KW, Cheung
YC, et al. Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding:
Multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting
needle lung biopsies. Chest 2004;126:748-54. doi: 10.1378/
chest.126.3.748.
19) Duzgun F, Tahsin S. Pekütan transtorasik akciğer ve kemik
biyopsileri. Trd Sem 2015;3:182-91.
20) Takeshita J, Masago K, Kato R, Hata A, Kaji R, Fujita S, et
al. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsies
of pulmonary lesions: A single-center experience with 750
biopsies in Japan. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:29-34.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13151.
21) Khan MF, Straub R, Moghaddam SR, Maataoui A, Gurung J,
Wagner TO, et al. Variables affecting the risk of pneumothorax
and intrapulmonal hemorrhage in CT-guided transthoracic biopsy.
Eur Radiol 2008;18:1356-63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0893-1.
22) Loh SE, Wu DD, Venkatesh SK, Ong CK, Liu E, Seto KY,
et al. CT-guided thoracic biopsy: Evaluating diagnostic yield
and complications. Ann Acad Med Singap 2013;42:285-90.
23) Aktas AR, Gozlek E, Yazkan R, Yilmaz O, Kayan M,
Demirtas H, et al. Transthoracic biopsy of lung masses: Non
technical factors affecting complication occurrence. Thorac
Cancer 2015;6:151-8. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12156.
24) Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, Razavi MK,
Sze DY, Dake MD. CT-guided transthoracic needle
aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: Needle size
and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 2003;229:475-81. doi:10.1148/radiol.2291020499.
25) Aberle DR, Gamsu G, Golden JA. Fatal systemic arterial
air embolism following lung needle aspiration. Radiology
1987;165:351-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.165.2.3659355.