ISSN : 1301-5680
e-ISSN : 2149-8156
TURKISH JOURNAL OF
THORACIC AND
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery     
The effect of micro-invasive endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy in palmar hyperhidrosis patients on quality of life and hyperhidrosis
Volkan Karaçam1, Aydın Şanlı1, Kemal Can Tertemiz2, Aydın Tasdöğen3
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Faculty of Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey
2Department of Chest Diseases, Medical Faculty of Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey
3Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Medical Faculty of Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey
DOI : 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2017.13497

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the effect of microinvasive endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy in primary palmar hyperhidrosis patients on the quality of life and hyperhidrosis.

Methods: Between March 2012 and May 2015, the data of 47 patients (27 males, 20 females; mean age mean age was 26.9±9.3 years; range 15 to 53 years) who underwent micro-invasive endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy due to primary palmar hyperhidrosis were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and postoperative Perfusion Index values at five min, compensatory hyperhidrosis at six months, scar formation at the wound site at six months, and the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale and Quality of Life Questionnaire scores at one and six months were analyzed.

Results: The mean operation time was 27.5±5.6 min. The surgical success rate was 100%. The rate of compensatory hyperhidrosis was 36.2% at six months. While 45 patients (95.7%) did not experience pain in the incision site at six months, two patients (4.3%) complained of mild pain. With regard to scar formation at the wound site, 44 patients (93.6%) described the wound site as “very good” and three patients (6.4%) described it as “good” at six months. A statistically significant improvement was found at the postoperative first- and sixth-month Quality of Life scores, compared to the baseline scores (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Our study results showed an elevated risk of compensatory hyperhidrosis and severity with the increased age and symptom duration. Based on our study results, patients with a high-risk of compensatory hyperhidrosis can be detected with preoperative analyses, and different therapeutic options can be applied due to low patient satisfaction. We consider that endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy with a single incision less than 1 cm should be the standard intervention, as it is associated with minimal pain and scar development in eligible patients.

Primary hyperhidrosis (PH) is a skin disease characterized by sweating more than required for the physiological thermoregulation.[1] It is usually seen in the palmar, axillary, plantar, or the facial regions. The incidence of PH is between 1 and 3%, depending on the culture and the climatic conditions.[2,3] Palmar symptoms often begin in early childhood, axillary symptoms in adolescence, and craniofacial symptoms in adulthood.[4]

Although PH can be treated medically, endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) is the most effective treatment.[4] However, there is no consensus on the technique to be applied, as cutting, cauterization, or clipping the sympathetic chain or ganglion can yield similar results with regard to the success of the procedure, patient satisfaction, and side effects.[5-8] The standard intervention is to cut the sympathetic chain by entering from the axilla through two or three ports. Recently, approaches through a transumbilical[9] or trans-areolar incision using a flexible endoscope have been reported for less scar and pain.[10] Of note, each method has some advantages and disadvantages.

In this study, we aimed to compare the newly developed techniques and the micro-invasive uniportal ETS operations. We also aimed to evaluate the patients with developing severe compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) following ETS using preoperative tests such as hyperhidrosis-specific assessments scales.

Methods

A total of 47 patients (27 males, 20 females; mean age 26.9±9.3 years; range 15 to 53 years) who underwent ETS due to primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH) between March 2012 and May 2015 were included in the study. The QoL questionnaire developed by De Campos,[11] data collection forms recommended by Cerfolio et al.,[2] and Hyperhidrosis Severity Scale (HDSS)[3] were used for standardization of the data. The pre- and postoperative first and sixth month data were evaluated retrospectively. All patients received conservative treatment for PPH and they underwent ETS voluntarily. Patients who had only facial hyperhidrosis and/or flushing, and only axillary hyperhidrosis were excluded from the study. Chest X-ray, electrocardiography, and routine blood tests were performed preoperatively. Surgery was recommended for the patients whose QoL questionnaire yielded poor or very poor results, as defined as a QoL score of >68.

The study protocol was approved by the Dokuz Eylül Üniversity Medical Faculty Ethics Committee. A written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Surgical technique
All procedures were performed under general anesthesia using a double-lumen tube and by a single thoracic surgeon. The patients were positioned in the semi-seated position and the arms in 90 degrees of abduction. The perfusion index (PI) was measured from the index finger of both hands. A 5 mm skin incision at the anterior axillary line crossed the third intercostal space was performed (Figure 1). A 5.5 mm port (Versaport™, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) was inserted, and the intrapleural space was visualized with a telescope (5.5 mm width, 50 cm length, 0°, Hopkins Telescope, Karl Storz GmbH & Co.KG, Tuttlingen, Germany). The port was slide out over the telescope to avoid nerve compression. The cautery-linked endodissector (Endo Dissect™, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) was directed to the thorax under the guidance of the telescope (Figure 2). In all patients, the third and fourth sympathetic chain (R3-4) and the potential Kuntz nerve field were transected with the endo-dissector. The PI was re-checked at 5 min of the procedure. If the PI elevated by more than 50%, the procedure was accepted as successful.[12] A fine catheter was applied for underwater drainage and, then, the patient was ventilated with high positive pressure. The catheter was taken out following the end of air drainage. The skin was closed with tissue adhesives (Figure 3). The same procedure was performed for the contralateral side. The control chest X-ray was performed at the postoperative fourth to sixth hour, and patients were discharged, if pneumothorax did not develop.

Figure 1: Skin incision less than 1 cm.

Figure 2: Telescope and endo-dissector is inserted into the chest on the same axis.

Figure 3: Postoperative wound closure with tissue adhesive.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS version 22.0 software(IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The descriptive data were expressed in mean and standard deviation (SD). The categorical variables were expressed in the number of cases and percentage. The Student t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used depending on the data dispersion. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of a total of 47 patients, the mean height was 172.7±7.1 (range, 166 to 184) cm, the mean weight was 71.5±12.2 (range, 51 to 98) kg, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.7±2.7 (range, 18 to 30) kg/m2. Symptoms began in childhood in nine patients (19.2%), in adolescents in 26 patients (55.3%), and in adulthood in 12 patients (25.5%). The mean time from the onset of hyperhidrosis to ETS operation was 10.9±8.0 (range, 2 to 35) years. There was a family history of hyperhidrosis in seven patients (14.8%).

The mean operation time was 27.5±5.6 (range, 25 to 35) min. The preoperative and 5 min PI values are shown in Table 1. Accordingly, the 5 min. PI value increased by 332% in the right hand and 326% in the left hand, indicating a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). None of the patients developed intraoperative complications; however, minimal residual pneumothorax was found in two patients postoperatively, which was treated with oxygen therapy. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.08±0.35 (range, 1 to 3) days.

Table 1: Pre- and postoperative 5 min Perfusion Index values from left and right hands

A significant improvement was observed, when the preoperative QoL scores (83.0±8.1) and postoperative first- (32.4±17.5) and sixth- (29.5±14.8) month QoL scores were compared (p<0.001). Similarly, at six months, the QoL scores were improved according to the first month (p<0.001). The mean pre- and postoperative first- and sixth-month values according to the HDSS were 3.7±0.4, 1.34±0.6, and 1.34±0.6, respectively. In addition, a significant improvement was found in the postoperative first- and sixth-month scores, compared to baseline scores (p<0.001 for each), although there was no significant difference between the postoperative first- and sixth-month scores (p>0.05).

According to the hyperhidrosis follow-up questionnaire, there was no pain at the wound site in 41 patients (87.2%) at the postoperative first month, while there was mild pain in six patients (12.8%). At the sixth-month follow-up, there was no pain at the wound site in 45 patients (95.7%), while there was mild pain in two patients (4.3%). When the patients were questioned with regard to the wound site scar formation, 40 patients (85.1%) responded as “very good” and seven patients (14.9%) responded as “good” at the postoperative first month. At six months, 44 patients (93.6%) responded as “very good” and three patients (6.4%) responded as “good”. In all patients, PPH was successfully treated. Excessive dryness in the hands was seen in four patients (8.5%).

Compensatory hyperhidrosis was seen in 19 patients (40.5%) at the postoperative first month and in 17 patients (36.2%) at the postoperative sixth month. The most common CH sites were the back (12.7%), back-abdomen-leg (8.5%), abdomen (6.4%), chest (4.3%), and abdomen-leg (4.3%). At the firstmonth control, there was severe CH in four patients (8.5%), moderate CH in six patients (12.8%), and mild CH in nine patients (19.1%). At six months, three patients (6.3%) had the complaint of severe CH, six patients (12.8%) had moderate CH, and nine patients (19.1%) had mild CH.

According to the patient satisfaction at the first month, four patients (8.5%) reported that they would never undergo ETS, while three patients (6.4%) reported as “Probably, I would undergo ETS”, nine patients (19.1%) reported as “I would undergo ETS”, and 31 patients (66.0%) responded as “I would certainly undergo”. At six months, three patients (6.4%) reported that they would never undergo ETS, while two patients (4.2%) reported as “Probably, I would undergo ETS”, nine patients (19.1%) reported as “I would undergo ETS”, and 33 patients (70.3%) reported as “I would certainly undergo”. At the firstmonth control, 40 patients (85.1%) reported that they would recommend ETS, while seven patients (14.9%) reported that they would not recommend it. At six months, 42 patients (89.4%) reported that they would recommend ETS, while five patients (10.6%) reported that they would not recommend the procedure.

The comparison of the clinical features, HDSS, and QoL scores of the patients with regard to CH and ETS recommendation are presented in Tables 2. There was a statistically significant difference between the first- and sixth-month scores in terms of CH and ETS recommendation, compared to the pre- and postoperative QoL scores, postoperative HDSS scores, age, and duration of symptoms (p<0.001). However, the patients were similar with regard to the preoperative HDSS scores, height, weight, and BMI values (p>0.05).

Table 2: Relationship with compensatory hyperhidrosis and clinical features, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale and Quality of Life Questionnaire scores of patients

Discussion

The patients should be evaluated in detail before the ETS to obtain the most optimal outcomes. Previously available questionnaire studies are quite useful for this purpose. The expectations should be taken into consideration according to the results of the questionnaire, success rates, and the potential side effects should be shared with the patient before making a decision regarding the treatment. Thus, the patients may experience a better postoperative period and may better tolerate the potential side effects. These questionnaires are also valuable for the postoperative follow-ups and determining the QoL. In this study, we evaluated these conditions caused by ETS.

Compensatory hyperhidrosis is the most common and most undesired side effect after ETS with a rate of 3 to 98%.[2] Unfortunately, the cause, severity, and the site of CH cannot be predicted. It is known that blockage of the second sympathetic ganglion, and blockage of multiple levels including the superior parts lead to more severe CH.[13,14] In our study, the rate of CH was 40.5% at one month and 36.2% at six month. Dongel et al.[15] reported a CH rate o f 71.4% in patients with transected R2-5. Cerfolio et al.[2] reported a consensus for standardization of treatment strategies. Accordingly, while a transection of R3-4 for palmar hyperhidrosis shows a high CH risk with a dry hand, only transection of R4 is related with a lower degree of CH with a moist hand. In our study, R3-4 was transected and PPH was treated with a 100% success rate, and no residue or recurrence was observed in the treated region. Although CH is seen at high rates following ETS, QoL is observed to improve in most patients. However, patient satisfaction varies depending on the CH severity. In our study, CH was significant in terms of the pre- and postoperative first- and sixth-month QoL scores, postoperative firstand sixth-month HDSS scores, age, and the duration of symptoms. In addition, we found that CH was more common in patients who were older than 34 years, the duration of symptoms longer than 16 years, in whom the QoL scores and postoperative HDSS scores were higher. Only three patients with severe CH reported that they would never undergo ETS and two patients with moderate CH reported that they would probably undergo ETS. Based on this finding, except for those who were defined as ideal ETS candidates by Cerfolio et al.,[2] we suggest that patients should be evaluated in more detail, the operation should be limited to the R4 level, the clip method should be applied due to reversibility, or the operation should not be recommended to those having a high risk for severe CH.

Although many studies measure the hand temperature to evaluate the intraoperative success of the procedure, we measured the PI value, which was used by Klodell et al.[12] Accordingly, together with the transected sympathetic chain, the PI value measured in the pulse oximetry device begins to elevate at approximately the first minute and, unless there is an accessory pathway, it remains elevated at the second min. The PI value increases earlier than the hand temperature, and its numerical value is higher.[12] In this study, we showed that the PI value significantly increased at 5 min after the transection.

Apart from the invisible scar tissue, we do not consider the trans-umbilical sympathectomy performed with flexible endoscopy as being more advantageous with regard to less pain and scar tissue development.[9] Although Zhu et al.[9] did not observe diaphragm pathologies in the long-term follow-up, abdominal irritation may lead to intra-peritoneal adhesions and diaphragm dysfunction. Furthermore, the necessity for switching to the standard method in case of pleural adhesion development is a negative condition for the patient. Trans-areolar endoscopic sympathectomy is another ETS method.[10] The advantages of this method include its applicability without intubation and that scar can be concealed. However, the possibility of injuring the sensitive breast tissue using the port continuously, being able to be applied only in males and second incision requirement in pleural adhesion are the disadvantages. Our method caused minimal pain by reducing the compression on the intercostal nerve using a thin port and removing it during the procedure. The procedure may be completed without an additional port, even in case of adhesion development. Closing the skin using tissue adhesive provides an excellent aesthetic appearance.

On the other hand, the limitation of our study is that, if a short telescope was used, the endo-dissector and the telescope could cross over at the entrance point due to the camera cap and the removed port. Nonetheless, we used a long telescope to work on the same axis with the endo-dissector.

In conclusion, our study results showed an elevated risk of compensatory hyperhidrosis and severity with the increased age and symptom duration. In addition, many patients reported that their Quality of Life improved, despite compensatory hyperhidrosis. It is important to apply the Quality of Life questionnaire in various seasons to evaluate the severity of the condition, patient satisfaction, and tolerability. Detecting a potentially severe compensatory hyperhidrosis risk and determining the treatment strategies according to this through detailed preoperative assessments and clinical experiences are of utmost importance for the patient satisfaction. We consider that endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy with a single incision less than 1 cm should be the standard intervention with uniportal surgeries, which have become popular, as it is associated with minimal pain and scar development in eligible patients. It is also possible to perform endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy with the uniportal method by minimally enlarging (1 cm) the skin incision and the use of 5 mm endoscopic clips.

Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

References

1) Moraites E, Vaughn OA, Hill S. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy. Dermatol Clin 2014;32:541-8.

2) Cerfolio RJ, Milanez de Campos JR, Bryant AS, Connery CP, Miller DL, Malcolm M, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons expert consensus for the surgical treatment of hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:1642-8.

3) Strutton DR, Kowalski JW, Glaser DA, Stang PE. US prevalence of hyperhidrosis and impact on individuals with axillary hyperhidrosis: results from a national survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:241-8.

4) Hamm H. Impact of hyperhidrosis on quality of life and its assessment. Dermatol Clin 2014;32:467-76.

5) Reisfeld R, Nguyen R, Pnini A. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: experience with both cauterization and clamping methods. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:255-67.

6) Cheng A, Johnsen H, Chang MY. Patient Satisfaction after Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy for Palmar Hyperhidrosis: Do Method and Level Matter? Perm J 2015;19:29-31.

7) Kocher GJ, Taha A, Ahler M, Schmid RA. Is clipping the preferable technique to perform sympathicotomy? A retrospective study and review of the literature. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015;400:107-12.

8) Yanagihara TK, Ibrahimiye A, Harris C, Hirsch J, Gorenstein LA. Analysis of clamping versus cutting of T3 sympathetic nerve for severe palmar hyperhidrosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:984-9.

9) Zhu LH, Chen W, Chen L, Yang S, Lu ZT. Transumbilical thoracic sympathectomy: a single-centre experience of 148 cases with up to 4 years of follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:79-83.

10) Chen J, Lin J, Tu Y, Lin M, Li X, Lai F. Nonintubated Transareolar Endoscopic Thoracic Sympathectomy with a Flexible Endoscope: Experience of 58 Cases. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;22:12-9.

11) De Campos JR, Kauffman P, Werebe EC, Andrade Filho LO, Kusniek S, Wolosker N, et al. Quality of life, before and after thoracic sympathectomy: report on 378 operated patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:886-91.

12) Klodell CT, Lobato EB, Willert JL, Gravenstein N. Oximetryderived perfusion index for intraoperative identification of successful thoracic sympathectomy 2005;80:467-70.

13) Schmidt J, Bechara FG, Altmeyer P, Zirngibl H. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for severe hyperhidrosis: impact of restrictive denervation on compensatory sweating. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1048-55.

14) Dewey TM, Herbert MA, Hill SL, Prince SL, Mack MJ. One-year follow-up after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: outcomes and consequences. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1227-33.

15) Döngel İ, Özkan B, Tanju S, Toker A. Long-term results of bilateral endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis: an eight-year experience. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2013;21:990-4.

Keywords : Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy; hyperhidrosis; microinvasive; quality of life

Viewed : 0
Downloaded : 0