ISSN : 1301-5680
e-ISSN : 2149-8156
TURKISH JOURNAL OF
THORACIC AND
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery     
Antegrade cerebral perfusion: A review of its current application
Anıl Ziya Apaydın
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
DOI : 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2021.21255

Abstract

The technique of antegrade cerebral perfusion has been adopted by many aortic surgery centers as the routine method of brain protection with some variations in its implementation. These variations stem from the issues with regard to the perfusion pressure, flow, temperature, pH management, hematocrit value, cannulation sites, and unilateral versus bilateral application. In this review, the prespecified issues were discussed and some recommendations about the implementation of antegrade cerebral perfusion were given.

Since its first introduction in relatively large series of arch replacement procedures by Kazui et al.,[1] and Bachet et al.,[2] t he t echnique o f a ntegrade c erebral perfusion (ACP) has been adopted by many aortic centers as the routine method of brain protection with some variations in its implementation stemming from perfusion pressure, flow, temperature, pH management, hematocrit value, cannulation sites, and unilateral versus bilateral application. In this review, these issues were discussed and some recommendations about the implementation of ACP were given.

Basic Science
Human brain weighs about 1,500 g and uses 15% of the total metabolic energy. This demand can be supplied by an average blood flow of 50 mL (3 mLO2) per 100 g of brain tissue per min. The mechanism of blood flow changes (with the adjustment of cerebral vascular resistance) according to the metabolic need is called autoregulation, and this safety feature can maintain adequate blood flow in a wide range of perfusion pressures (mean: 50 to 130 mmHg).[3] Autoregulation may be lost in deep hypothermia, resulting in a "luxury" perfusion of the brain with a risk of increased intracerebral pressures and cerebral edema.[4]

Animal studies
The porcine model was mostly used to address the issues related to the aforementioned variables. Halstead et al.[5] reported that alpha-stat management for ACP provided more effective metabolic suppression and better preservation of cerebral autoregulation than pH-stat. In another study, these authors also suggested that selective cerebral perfusion (20°C) at 50 mmHg provided neuroprotection superior to those at higher pressures.[6] In a study comparing hypothermic ACP with low (20%) and high (30%) hematocrit groups, both groups had equivalent cerebral metabolic suppression, while the low hematocrit group had higher cerebral blood flow which may be injurious possibly due to an embolic load.[7]

Clinical studies
Pressure, flow, temperature
Clinical applications of ACP at moderate hypothermia with different variations in flow, pressure, and temperature have been reported. Some of them are summarized in Table 1.[8-14] Accordingly, in series with warmer temperatures, the flow and pressure were kept higher.

Table 1: Some of the clinical applications of antegrade cerebral perfusion at moderate hypothermia

In most of the studies, the flow rates of ACP are the same for unilateral or bilateral applications. One should consider these flow rates as the total blood supply to the brain delivered either one or more sources.

Unilateral versus bilateral ACP
There are numerous clinical studies and metaanalyses comparing the outcomes of unilateral and bilateral ACP.[12-16] They found similar mortality and neurological event rates. However, the outcome measures such as mortality and stroke are multifactorial, particularly in the setting of emergent operations for acute dissections and cannot be attributed to the type of ACP implementation. In general, the preference of bilateral application has been based upon factors, such as predicted long periods of ACP (>40 to 50 min), decrease in near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) values, and incomplete circle of Willis.[13,16]

Cannulation sites
The right subclavian, innominate, carotid and brachial arteries have been used for cannulation either directly or through a side graft.[8-14,17-19] The advantages and risks are briefly shown in Table 2. Arch grafts, either straight or multibranched, can be cannulated either directly or through a side arm for ACP.

Table 2: Cannulation sites for antegrade cerebral perfusion

Left subclavian artery perfusion/occlusion-when?
The left subclavian artery can be kept cross-clamped during ACP to prevent back-bleeding or to monitor left radial artery pressure as an indirect indicator of sufficient cerebral cross-perfusion.[11] In cases of an occluded right vertebral artery, dominant left vertebral artery or lack of adequate intracranial communication, additional left subclavian artery perfusion can be used, as described by Kazui[10]

Lower body ischemia
In a comparison of two groups of 92 patients with ACP and lower body ischemia of more than 60 min, the rate of paraplegia was 18% at a body temperature of 25 to 28°C, while it was 0% at 20 to 24°C.[20] Although the difference was not statistically significant, it raises concern about spinal cord ischemia at higher temperatures. Distal perfusion during aortic arch surgery has been shown to reduce the incidence of end-organ complications, particularly in more extensive and time-consuming procedures.[21] Etz et al.[22] reported that ACP without distal aortic perfusion longer than 90 min at 28°C was associated with an increased risk of paraplegia in a pig model. Therefore, it is reasonable to perfuse the distal aorta by constructing the descending aortic anastomosis at an earlier stage of a prolonged ACP.

Our current ACP application
We use the right subclavian artery for unilateral ACP with a flow of 10 mL/kg/min at 24°C to maintain a pressure of 50 mmHg. If bilateral ACP is required, we perfuse the left carotid artery using the cardioplegia pump head and a balloon-tipped catheter (Figure 1).

Figure 1: I llustration of the method of a ntegrade cerebral perfusion. Main pump flow is delivered to the brain for unilateral perfusion through a cannula in the right subclavian artery while the base of the innominate artery is clamped. If bilateral cerebral perfusion is required, the left carotid artery can be perfused through a balloon-tipped catheter connected to the cardioplegia pump head.
CP: Cardioplegia pump.

Conclusion

The use of ACP is on the rise as in a report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissections (IRAD) database.[23] In a study from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database including more than 7,000 acute type A aortic dissection repairs, Ghoreishi et al.[24] reported that circulatory arrest was performed without cerebral perfusion in 29% of the patients. Among those patients in whom cerebral perfusion was used (71%), two-thirds received ACP. Of note, comparison of the outcomes after hypothermic circulatory arrest-alone versus ACP is beyond the scope of this report.

In conclusion, there are limited number of animal studies and numerous relatively large retrospective case series and a few meta-analyses investigating the safe limits of ACP. Some of these studies are covered in this article to give recommendations for safe implementation of ACP (Table 3). Since the results with the current applications are quite satisfactory, there may be no urgent need for a prospective, randomized trial to obtain solid evidence in the near future. Acknowledgement The author thanks Merve Evren, PhD for her professional illustration.

Table 3: Suggested ACP variables at different temperatures based on current clinical applications

Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

References

1) Kazui T, Inoue N, Komatsu S. Surgical treatment of aneurysms of the transverse aortic arch. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1989;30:402-6.

2) Bachet J, Guilmet D, Goudot B, Termignon JL, Teodori G, Dreyfus G, et al. Cold cerebroplegia. A new technique of cerebral protection during operations on the transverse aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:85-93.

3) Ergin MA. Principles of cerebral protection during operations on the thoracic aorta. In: Franco KL, Verrier ED, editors. Advanced Therapy in Cardiac Surgery. Ontario: B.C. Decker; 1999. p. 257-69.

4) Ehrlich MP, McCullough JN, Zhang N, Weisz DJ, Juvonen T, Bodian CA, et al. Effect of hypothermia on cerebral blood flow and metabolism in the pig. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:191-7.

5) Halstead JC, Spielvogel D, Meier DM, Weisz D, Bodian C, Zhang N, et al. Optimal pH strategy for selective cerebral perfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:266-73.

6) Halstead JC, Meier M, Wurm M, Zhang N, Spielvogel D, Weisz D, et al. Optimizing selective cerebral perfusion: deleterious effects of high perfusion pressures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:784-91.

7) Halstead JC, Wurm M, Meier DM, Zhang N, Spielvogel D, Weisz D, et al. Avoidance of hemodilution during selective cerebral perfusion enhances neurobehavioral outcome in a survival porcine model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:514-20.

8) Zierer A, El-Sayed Ahmad A, Papadopoulos N, Moritz A, Diegeler A, Urbanski PP. Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and mild (28°C-30°C) systemic hypothermic circulatory arrest for aortic arch replacement: results from 1002 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144:1042-49.

9) Misfeld M, Mohr FW, Etz CD. Best strategy for cerebral protection in arch surgery - antegrade selective cerebral perfusion and adequate hypothermia. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013;2:331-8.

10) Kazui T. Total arch replacement with separated graft technique and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013;2:353-7.

11) Urbanski PP, Thamm T, Bougioukakis P, Irimie V, Prasad P, Diegeler A, et al. Efficacy of unilateral cerebral perfusion for brain protection in aortic arch surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;159:365-71.

12) Preventza O, Simpson KH, Cooley DA, Cornwell L, Bakaeen FG, Omer S, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral cerebral perfusion for acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:80-7.

13) Angleitner P, Stelzmueller ME, Mahr S, Kaider A, Laufer G, Ehrlich M. Bilateral or unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion during surgery for acute type A dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;159:2159-67.

14) Norton EL, Wu X, Kim KM, Patel HJ, Deeb GM, Yang B. Unilateral is comparable to bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion in acute type A aortic dissection repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;160:617-25.

15) Angeloni E, Benedetto U, Takkenberg JJ, Stigliano I, Roscitano A, Melina G, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral antegrade cerebral protection during circulatory arrest in aortic surgery: a meta-analysis of 5100 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:60-7.

16) Malvindi PG, Scrascia G, Vitale N. Is unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion equivalent to bilateral cerebral perfusion for patients undergoing aortic arch surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:891-7.

17) Küçüker SA, Ozatik MA, Saritaş A, Taşdemir O. Arch repair with unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:638-43.

18) Wang X, Yang F, Wang L, Hou D, Zhu J, Liu Y, et al. Safety of Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest During Unilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion for Aortic Arch Surgery. Can J Cardiol 2019;35:1483-90.

19) Apaydin AZ, Islamoglu F, Askar FZ, Engin C, Posacioglu H, Yagdi T, et al. Immediate clinical outcome after prolonged periods of brain protection: retrospective comparison of hypothermic circulatory arrest, retrograde, and antegrade perfusion. J Card Surg 2009;24:486-9.

20) Kamiya H, Hagl C, Kropivnitskaya I, Böthig D, Kallenbach K, Khaladj N, et al. The safety of moderate hypothermic lower body circulatory arrest with selective cerebral perfusion: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:501-9.

21) Della Corte A, Scardone M, Romano G, Amarelli C, Biondi A, De Santo LS, et al. Aortic arch surgery: thoracoabdominal perfusion during antegrade cerebral perfusion may reduce postoperative morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1358-64.

22) Etz CD, Luehr M, Kari FA, Lin HM, Kleinman G, Zoli S, et al. Selective cerebral perfusion at 28 degrees C--is the spinal cord safe? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:946-55.

23) Parikh N, Trimarchi S, Gleason TG, Kamman AV, di Eusanio M, Myrmel T, et al. Changes in operative strategy for patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection interventional cohort program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;153:S74-S79.

24) Ghoreishi M, Sundt TM, Cameron DE, Holmes SD, Roselli EE, Pasrija C, et al. Factors associated with acute stroke after type A aortic dissection repair: An analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;159:2143-54.

Keywords : Aortic surgery, antegrade cerebral perfusion, cerebral protection

Viewed : 0
Downloaded : 0