ISSN : 1301-5680
e-ISSN : 2149-8156
Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery     
Açık kalp ameliyatı yapılan hastalarda heparin direncinin görülme sıklığı ve tedavi stratejilerinin değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif bir çalışma
Dilek Kazancı, Bahar Aydınlı, Sema Turan, Aslı Dönmez, Ahmet Saraç, Eslem İnce, Mine Chavush, Ayşegül Özgök
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara Turkey
DOI : 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2013.7972

Abstract

Background: This study aims to identify the incidence of heparin resistance in patients undergoing open heart surgery and to evaluate treatment strategies.

Methods: January 2010 and December 2010, 1101 consecutive open heart surgery patients were retrospectively analyzed using their anesthetic charts. Demographic data of the patients, activated coagulation time (ACT), administration of additional heparin dose, fresh-frozen plasma, and antithrombin III (AT-III) treatments were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed based on frequency tables and median calculation in all categories.

Results: Of patients, 409 patients (37%) received additional heparin once (n=305) and twice (n=54). Forty-nine patients (4.45%) with normal ACT levels (<450 sec) after second additional heparin dose, received fresh frozen plasma. Antithrombin-III treatment was given to two patients (0.18%). A total of 37% patients needed higher doses of heparin with a 4.45% and 0.18% incidence of fresh frozen plasma and AT-III treatments respectively. The incidence of heparin resistance was 4.6%.

Conclusion: Our study results showed that the most frequently preferred treatment modality was fresh-frozen plasma application in patients with heparin resistance to achieve normal ACT levels.

In patients who will undergo heart surgery, anticoagulation, which is achieved with heparin, is essential for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The primary mechanism of action of this drug is the activation of antithrombin (AT) III, which prevents thrombin transformation from prothrombin. Thus, it reduces the production of clots. However, in some cases, despite a standard heparin dose, the intended active coagulation time (ACT) cannot be obtained. This condition is known as heparin resistance (HR). For patients undergoing heart surgery, many studies have reported the incidence of HR to be between 4 and 22%,[1-7] with the most frequent causes being AT deficiency, increases in the clearance of heparin the protein that joins with heparin, and high levels of factor 8, fibrinogen, and platelet factor (PF) 4.[8] In addition, HR has also been reported as a result of using medications such as aprotinin and nitroglycerin.[9]

Our goal in this study was to retrospectively determine the incidence of HR in patients who underwent heart surgery at our hospital and evaluate the appropriate treatment strategies.

Methods

After local ethics committee approval, 1,101 patients (mean age, 57.8±27.3; female/male ratio, 781/320) who had undergone open heart surgery at our hospital between January 2010-December 2010 were retrospectively screened, and their intraoperative anesthesia form reports were investigated. Those who had received preoperative heparin, streptokinase, and oral contraceptives as well as those who had coagulation disorder were excluded from the study. We included only patients who had undergone coronary angiography five or more days prior to the surgery, and their demographic characteristics, additional diseases, type of operation, number of reoperations, and times that heparin was given along with their use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), nitroglycerin infusion, and AT-III were recorded.

For anesthetic premedication, the patients were orally given 5-10 mg of diazepam the night before the operation, and 0.1 mg/kg of morphine was given 30 minutes before the surgery. They were then taken to the operating room. After routine monitoring, arterial blood samples were taken via the arterial route to determine a baseline ACT, and the Hepcon® HMS Plus system (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used to obtain the baseline kaolin ACT.

Induction was provided with midazolam, fentanyl, and rocuronium. In addition to the use of oxygen (O2), fentanyl, dormicum, and rocuronium were utilized to maintain total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). After tracheal intubation, central venous catheterization (CVC) was provided through the internal jugular vein. Before CPB, heparin was used (3-4 mg/kg) for the purpose of anticoagulation. If the patient’s ACT was above 400 seconds, additional therapy was not given, but if it was under 400 seconds, an additional heparin dose of 50 mg was given. After the additional heparin, we obtained one more blood sample and measured the ACT again. If the patient still had not reached the necessary ACT, another 50 mg dose of heparin was given. For these cases, an additional blood sample was taken, and the ACT was measured one more time. If an ACT of above 400 seconds was not obtained at that point, 300 cc (one unit) of FFP was given to the patient intravenously. Intraoperative AT activity could not be measured, so we applied 100 mg AT-III therapy in the cases in which full heparinization was not achieved in spite of the additional heparin and FFP therapy (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Heparin administration scheme. ACT: Active coagulation time.

Heparin resistance was identified if the ACT was less than 400 seconds after 300 U/kg of heparin (local criteria) or if it was less than 400 seconds after 400 U/kg or more of heparin (stringent criteria). The primary solution for the CPB machine was composed of 1500 ml lactated Ringer’s, a 20% mannitol solution calculated by taking into account the patient’s body weight, two ampules of vitamin C concentrate, 30 meq of bicarbonate (HCO3) solution, and heparin added according to patient’s weight. The heparin was reversed with protamine in accordance with the first heparin dose. Statistical analysis was performed in all categories with frequency tables, median calculations, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) table, and a chi-square test.

Results

The incidence rate was 23.6% for diabetes mellitus (DM) and 46.4% for hypertension in our study (Table 1). Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed on 61.7% of the patients. Another 13.7% underwent valve replacement, and 25.6% had other types of surgical procedures. In addition, 29 of the participants underwent reoperations. Ten of these received additional doses of heparin, and two of the 10 needed FFP. Furthermore, none of the patients who underwent surgery reoperation because of an insufficient response to AT-III achieved the appropriate ACT.

Table 1: Demographic data

Additional heparin doses were not given to 742 patients (67.4%); however, 305 patients (27.7%) were given heparin once, and 54 patients (4.9%) were given it twice. After the second additional heparin dose, 49 patients (4.5%) who had reached the required ACT (<400 seconds) received FFP. When comparing the group which did not receive additional heparin with the group that did, the statistical FFP intake was found to be significantly more frequent (p<0.000). Two patients (0.18%) were given AT-III treatment, and the frequency of AT-III intake was similar between the two groups of patients (p=0.106). Additionally, there was no statistical difference between the patients who received additional heparin and those who received none with regard to age, gender, DM, hypertension, and type of surgery (Table 2).

Table 2: Demographic data of patients who received additional heparin doses and those who received no additional heparin

Our results showed that 409 patients (37%) needed a higher dose of heparin. In addition, 49 patients (4.45%) were treated with FFP, and two (0.18%) received AT-III.

Discussion

Heparin is a drug that has been available for more than 50 years and is used for anticoagulation. Although it is effective, it has pharmacokinetic, biophysical, and biological limitations. The standard heparin anticoagulant response varies greatly among patients; therefore, before starting treatment, the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and/or clotting time should be surveyed. Furthermore, treatment should be directed dynamically by titration through the observation of the clinical course and monitorization of the associated parameters. Heparin is used in open heart surgery to provide anticoagulation before entering CPB. After the application, a satisfactory anticoagulation level is maintained with ACT. When sufficient ACT is not obtained, additional heparin is applied. However, if the required ACT is still not obtained, then HR should be considered. In cases where HR was observed, when the other intraoperative drugs were evaluated, it was seen that nitroglycerin intake did not differ in the cases where HR did not develop. However, in a previous study in which Kanbak et al.[9] studied the effects of nitroglycerin on coagulation and heparin sensitivity in patients that received nitroglycerin during CPB, they discovered that nitroglycerin had increased HR. On the other hand, in both their in vitro and in vivo studies, Lepor et al.[10] showed that short-term nitroglycerin infusions did not increase HR. Furthermore, Koh et al.[11] reported that the heparin dose was not affected by intravenous nitroglycerin infusion. Similarly, we also observed that nitroglycerin did not affect the heparin response.

Knapik et al.,[12] in their study on the relationship between HR and postoperative complications in cases of open heart surgery determined that 4.3% of their patients obtained an ACT of lower than 400 seconds following 400 IU/kg heparin application. In our study, in spite of giving heparin doses of 400 IU/kg or higher, only 5% of the patients had an ACT of lower than 400 seconds. Assuming that this was a result of HR, we treated the developing situation with FFP (4.5%) and AT-III (0.5%).

Potential risk factors for HR include patients older than 65 years old, a platelet count >300,000 cells/ mm3, recent heparin exposure, and AT deficiency.[13,14] In our study, 32 of the 54 patients who developed HR were 65 years old or older, and 52 of these 54 had a platelet count of 300,000 or over. None of our patients who received preoperative heparin were included in the study since the preoperative AT-III activities of these patients were unknown. Garvin et al.,[14] showed that the preoperative AT-III level did not affect the heparin response but found that preoperative heparin only decreased AT-III activity. However, this decrease did not change the heparin dose response. Researchers have stated that the heparin ACT response is very complex and know that it can be affected by many endogenous factors; hence, it is not the best choice to attest to HR.[15]

In treating patients who develop HR, FFP and AT-III are commonly used. While most patients respond to FFP application, more resistant cases require AT-III. In recent years, different drugs have been used for patients who develop HR. Kikura et al.[16] used nafamostat mesylate (Naf) and determined that the patients reached a satisfactory ACT. Moreover, when evaluating perioperative ischemic stroke, the most important problem associated with the use of this drug, no significant differences were found between the patients who received Naf and those who did not.

This study had important limitations. For example, we did not know the preoperative AT-III concentration. In addition, regardless of how it is used, ACT is unreliable for assessing heparin anticoagulation in the operating room. We also did not include longterm results (ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, morbidity, and mortality) because we could only conduct our research via the intraoperative anesthesia form reports.

In conclusion we determined incidence of HR 37.2%, 4.6% according to local and stringent criteria respectively. Furthermore, in cases where HR developed, the preferred method of treatment was FFP because it allowed the patients to reach the intended ACT.

Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

References

1) Jung HJ, Kim JB, Im KS, Oh SH, Lee JM. Heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2009;10:940-1. doi: 10.2459/ JCM.0b013e32832ffca0.

2) Avidan MS, Levy JH, Scholz J, Delphin E, Rosseel PM, Howie MB, et al. A phase III, double-blind, placebocontrolled, multicenter study on the efficacy of recombinant human antithrombin in heparin-resistant patients scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery necessitating cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 2005;102:276-84.

3) Avidan MS, Levy JH, van Aken H, Feneck RO, Latimer RD, Ott E, et al. Recombinant human antithrombin III restores heparin responsiveness and decreases activation of coagulation in heparin-resistant patients during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:107-13.

4) Ranucci M, Isgrò G, Cazzaniga A, Ditta A, Boncilli A, Cotza M, Carboni G, Brozzi S. Different patterns of heparin resistance: therapeutic implications. Perfusion 2002;17:199-204.

5) Williams MR, D’Ambra AB, Beck JR, Spanier TB, Morales DL, Helman DN, et al. A randomized trial of antithrombin concentrate for treatment of heparin resistance. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:873-7.

6) Ranucci M, Isgrò G, Cazzaniga A, Soro G, Menicanti L, Frigiola A. Predictors for heparin resistance in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 1999;14:437-42.

7) Staples MH, Dunton RF, Karlson KJ, Leonardi HK, Berger RL. Heparin resistance after preoperative heparin therapy or intraaortic balloon pumping. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1211-6.

8) Hirsh J, O’Donnell M, Weitz JI. New anticoagulants. Blood. 2005;105:453-63.

9) Kanbak M, Oc B, Salman MA, Ocal T, Oc M. Peroperative effects of fresh frozen plasma and antithrombin III on heparin sensitivity and coagulation during nitroglycerine infusion in coronary artery bypass surgery. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2011;22:593-9. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32834a0478.

10) Lepor NE, Amin DK, Berberian L, Shah PK. Does nitroglycerin induce heparin resistance? Clin Cardiol 1989;12:432-4.

11) Koh KK, Park GS, Song JH, Moon TH, In HH, Kim JJ, et al. Interaction of intravenous heparin and organic nitrates in acute ischemic syndromes. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:706-9.

12) Knapik P, Ciesla D, Przybylski R, Knapik T. The influence of heparin resistance on postoperative complications in patients undergoing coronary surgery. Med Sci Monit 2012;18:CR105-111.

13) Ranucci M, Isgrò G, Cazzaniga A, Soro G, Menicanti L, Frigiola A. Predictors for heparin resistance in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 1999;14:437-42.

14) Garvin S, Fitzgerald D, Muehlschlegel JD, Perry TE, Fox AA, Shernan SK, et al. Heparin dose response is independent of preoperative antithrombin activity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery using low heparin concentrations. Anesth Analg 2010;111:856-61. doi: 10.1213/ ANE.0b013e3181ce1ffa.

15) Staples M, Dunton D, Karlson K, Leonardi H, Berger R. Heparin resistance after preoperative heparin therapy or intraaortic ballon pumping. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1211-6.

16) Kikura M, Tanaka K, Hiraiwa T, Tanaka K. Nafamostat mesilate, as a treatment for heparin resistance, is not associated with perioperative ischemic stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012;26:239-44. doi: 10.1053/j. jvca.2011.09.002.

Keywords : Kardiyopulmoner baypas; heparin; direnç
Viewed : 11603
Downloaded : 2590